推进技术 ›› 2015, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (11): 1677-1685.

• 燃烧 传热 传质 • 上一篇    下一篇

改进的预测气体燃料贫油熄火边界的半经验公式

孙 磊,黄 勇,张 鼎,肖 为   

  1. 北京航空航天大学 航空发动机气动热力重点实验室,北京 100191,北京航空航天大学 航空发动机气动热力重点实验室,北京 100191,北京航空航天大学 航空发动机气动热力重点实验室,北京 100191,北京航空航天大学 航空发动机气动热力重点实验室,北京 100191
  • 发布日期:2021-08-15
  • 作者简介:孙 磊(1988—),男,博士生,研究领域为航空发动机燃烧。

An Improved Semi-Empirical Correlation for Prediction of Lean Blowout Limits for Gas Turbine Combustors Using Gas Fuel

  1. National Key Laboratory of Aerodynamics & Thermodynamics on Aero-Engine,Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics,Beijing 100191,China,National Key Laboratory of Aerodynamics & Thermodynamics on Aero-Engine,Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics,Beijing 100191,China,National Key Laboratory of Aerodynamics & Thermodynamics on Aero-Engine,Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics,Beijing 100191,China and National Key Laboratory of Aerodynamics & Thermodynamics on Aero-Engine,Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics,Beijing 100191,China
  • Published:2021-08-15

摘要: 为了进一步考察采用气体燃料时,火焰体积(FV)模型对贫油熄火边界预测的适用性,推导了气体燃料的FV模型。经过对7种典型的航空发动机燃烧室(即采用双径向旋流器和双轴向旋流器,分别改变一级旋流器、二级旋流器的进气面积和主燃孔的个数)进行验证实验,并与液体燃料FV模型和Lefebvre模型的预测结果进行比较。结果表明,上述三种模型虽然基本都可以用于气体燃料贫油熄火边界的预测,但各自的预测精度不同。在实验范围内,气体燃料FV模型、液体燃料FV模型、Lefebvre模型的预测精度依次为[±]5.6%,[±]6.9%,[±]7.1%。气体燃料FV模型在预测气体燃料的贫油熄火边界时有最好的预测精度。

关键词: 燃气轮机燃烧室;气体燃料;贫油熄火边界预测;气体燃料FV模型

Abstract: In order to further investigate the applicability of Flame Volume (FV) model for predicting lean blowout limits of gas fuels,FV-model for gas fuels is deduced. To validate this model,experiments are conducted on 7 typical aircraft engine combustors (adopting dual-radial swirl-stabilized assembly and dual-axial swirl-stabilized assembly,changing flow area of primary swirler and secondary swirler and number of primary holes,respectively). The results predicted by gas fuel FV-model are compared with the results by liquid fuel FV-model and Lefebvre model. It verified that aforementioned 3 models can predict lean blowout for gas fuels,while respective predictive accuracies are slightly different. Within the limit of these experiments,the predictive accuracies of gas fuel FV-model,liquid fuel FV-model,Lefebvre model are [±]5.6%,[±]6.9%,[±]7.1%,respectively. In conclusion,gas fuel FV-model has best accuracy to predict lean blowout limits for gas fuel.

Key words: Gas turbine combustor;Gas fuels;Prediction of lean blowout limits; FV-model for gas fuels