20cm口径离子推力器栅极组件结构性能分析

推进技术 ›› 2016, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (3): 585-592.

20cm口径离子推力器栅极组件结构性能分析

孙明明,刘永明,王亮

兰州空间技术物理研究所真空技术与物理重点实验室，甘肃兰州 730000,兰州空间技术物理研究所真空技术与物理重点实验室，甘肃兰州 730000,兰州空间技术物理研究所真空技术与物理重点实验室，甘肃兰州 730000

发布日期:2021-08-15
作者简介:孙明明，男，博士生，研究领域为空间电推进技术。
基金资助:
真空低温技术与物理重点实验室基金(9140c550206130c5503)。

Structural Analysis of Grids Assembly for LIPS-200 Ion Thruster

Science and Technology on Vacuum Technology and Physics Laboratory， Lanzhou Institute of Physics，Lanzhou 730000，China,Science and Technology on Vacuum Technology and Physics Laboratory， Lanzhou Institute of Physics，Lanzhou 730000，China and Science and Technology on Vacuum Technology and Physics Laboratory， Lanzhou Institute of Physics，Lanzhou 730000，China

Published:2021-08-15

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为了对20cm口径离子推力器栅极组件开展结构性能模拟分析，通过材料力学分析方法对栅极组件进行结构等效处理并进行验证，利用ANSYS有限元软件得到推力器的模态分析结果和栅极组件的模态振型，并开展基频扫描试验验证模态分析结果的正确性，最后模拟了推力器在1600g冲击载荷作用时，栅极组件的应力分布和形变结果。结果显示:将栅极组件等效为拱高不变且无孔的结构后，屏栅等效弹性模量为20.79GPa，加速栅等效弹性模量为89.43GPa；栅极组件表面的螺栓预应力大约在20～33MPa范围之间；模态分析结果显示，大于320Hz的振动频率时，栅极组件会出现较大的结构变化；通过10～1000Hz的基频扫描试验得到推力器基频在168Hz，分析结果(185.23Hz)相比误差约10%；1600g的冲击载荷作用下，栅极组件边缘处最大形变达到约0.27mm，且表面边缘处的应力相对中心处较大，更容易发生破裂。

关键词: 离子推力器；栅极组件；力学性能；结构形变

Abstract: In order to perform simulation on the structural analysis of 20cm diameter ion thruster grids assembly，the grids assembly was equivalently handled in structure by material mechanics and validated. Finite element software ANSYS was used to analyze the thruster mode，the mode vibration type，and base-frequency scanning experiment was performed to validate the mode analysis results. Also the stress and deformation of grids assembly were simulated under 1600g shocking payload. The obtained results indicate that，after the grids assembly being handled equivalently，the screen grid equivalent Young’s modulus is 20.79GPa and the same parameter of the accelerator grid is 89.43GPa. The prestressing force sensed by the bolt on the grids assembly is approximately in the range of 20～33MPa. With the vibration frequency greater than 320Hz，larger structural deformation will occur in the grids assembly，by 10～1000Hz base frequency scanning experiments the thruster base frequency is found to be 168Hz，which differs from analysis results (185.23Hz) by approximately 10%. Under 1600g of shocking，the maximum deformation on the grids assembly brim reaches 0.27mm. The surface brim will sense larger force compared with the center region，and the fracture is easier to occur at the brim.

Key words: Ion thruster；Grids assembly；Mechanical properties；Structural deformation

孙明明,刘永明,王亮. 20cm口径离子推力器栅极组件结构性能分析[J]. 推进技术, 2016, 37(3): 585-592.

SUN Ming-ming,LIU Yong-ming,WANG Liang. Structural Analysis of Grids Assembly for LIPS-200 Ion Thruster[J]. Journal of Propulsion Technology, 2016, 37(3): 585-592.

参考文献

[1] 刘文一, 杨涓. 电子回旋共振推力器C/C复合材料栅极的力学性能[J]. 推进技术, 2007, 28(6): 692-696. (LIU Wen-yi, YANG Juan. Mechanical Property Evaluation of C/C Composite Material Grids for Electron Cyclotron Resonance Thruster[J]. Journal of Propulsion Technology, 2007, 28(6): 692-696.)
[2] Mueller J, Brophy J, Brown D. Endurance Testing and Fabrication of Advanced 15cm and 30cm Carbon-Carbon Composite Grids [R]. AIAA 95-2660.
[3] Haag T, Soulas G. Performance of 8cm Pyrolytic-Graphite Ion Thruster Optics[R]. AIAA 2002-4335.
[4] Haag T, Soulas G. Performance and Vibration of 30cm Pyrolytic Ion Thruster Optics[R]. AIAA 2003-4557.
[5] Meckel N, Polaha J. Structural Analysis of Pyrolytic Graphite Optics for the HiPEP Ion Thruster[R]. AIAA 2004-3629.
[6] Hassani B, Hinton E. A Review of Homogenization and Topology Optimization I-Homogenization Theory for Media with Periodic Structrues[J]. Computers and Structures, 1999, 69(9): 707-717.
[7] Hassani B, Hinton E. A Review of Homogenization and Topology Optimization II-Analytical and Numerical Solution of Homogenization Equations[J]. Computers and Structures, 1999, 69(9): 719-738.
[8] Hassani B, Hinton E. A Review of Homogenization and Topology Optimization III-Topology Optimization Using Optimality Criteria[J]. Computers and Structures, 1999, 69(9): 739-756.
[9] 浦广益. ANSYS Workbench基础教程与实例详解[M]. 北京:中国水利水电出版社, 2013: 240-241.
[10] 李会勋, 胡迎春, 张建中. 利用ANSYS模拟螺栓预紧力的研究[J]. 山东科技大学学报(自然科学版), 2005, 25(1): 37-40.
[11] 张永杰, 孙秦. 带预紧力受剪螺栓刚度分析[J]. 强度与环境, 2007, (34)4: 22-26.
[12] 祖炳锋, 付光琦, 徐玉梁, 等. 车用柴油机缸孔在缸盖螺栓预紧力下变形的数值模拟与试验研究[J]. 内燃机工程, 2010, 31(2): 98-104.
[13] 黄侨, 胡健琛, 黄志伟, 等. 考虑减振装置弹簧刚度的斜拉索等效索长及索力测量[J]. 东南大学学报(自然科学版), 2012, 42(4): 724-728.
[14] 李宝华, 魏建国, 刘京红. 非线性粘滞阻尼器减震结构参数研究[J]. 山西建筑, 2006, 32(20): 7-8.
[15] 苏荣华, 彭晨宇. 振动筛橡胶弹簧非线性刚度实验及仿真研究[J]. 应用基础与工程科学学报, 2011, 19(6): 986-993.
[16] 刘文芝, 武建新, 薛俊芳, 等. 滚动球窝喷管动态性能分析[J]. 推进技术, 2013, 34(2): 145-151. (LIU Wen-zhi, WU Jian-xin, XUE Jun-fang, et al. Dynamic Characteristics Analysis of Rolling Ball Joint Socket Nozzle[J]. Journal of Propulsion Technology, 2013, 34(2): 145-151.)　　　　　　　　　　　　　*　收稿日期:2014-10-27；修订日期:2014-12-30。基金项目:真空低温技术与物理重点实验室基金(9140c550206130c5503)。作者简介:孙明明,男,博士生,研究领域为空间电推进技术。E-mail: smmhappy@163.com(编辑:梅瑛)