多路等离子体合成射流改善翼型性能实验研究

推进技术 ›› 2018, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (9): 1928-1937.

多路等离子体合成射流改善翼型性能实验研究

苏志,李军,梁华,魏彪,陈杰

空军工程大学航空航天工程学院等离子体重点实验室，陕西西安 710038,空军工程大学航空航天工程学院等离子体重点实验室，陕西西安 710038,空军工程大学航空航天工程学院等离子体重点实验室，陕西西安 710038,空军工程大学航空航天工程学院等离子体重点实验室，陕西西安 710038,空军工程大学航空航天工程学院等离子体重点实验室，陕西西安 710038

发布日期:2021-08-15
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金(51336011；51407197)；国防科技项目基金(2201058)；博士后科学基金(2014M562446)。

Experimental Investigation of Enhancing Airfoil Aerodynamic Performance with Multichannel Plasma Synthetic Jet

Science and Technology on Plasma Dynamics Laboratory，Air Force Engineering University，Xi’an 710038，China,Science and Technology on Plasma Dynamics Laboratory，Air Force Engineering University，Xi’an 710038，China,Science and Technology on Plasma Dynamics Laboratory，Air Force Engineering University，Xi’an 710038，China,Science and Technology on Plasma Dynamics Laboratory，Air Force Engineering University，Xi’an 710038，China and Science and Technology on Plasma Dynamics Laboratory，Air Force Engineering University，Xi’an 710038，China

Published:2021-08-15

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 等离子体合成射流(PSJ)响应快，频带宽，强度大，在飞行器增升减阻领域具有广阔应用前景。但常规等离子体合成射流只是单点激励，作用范围小，控制效果弱。为提高等离子体合成射流抑制机翼流动分离的能力，设计了一种新型多路放电电路驱动合成射流，使单个电源产生5～12路多点、高强度合成射流激励，并将其用于高升力翼型失速分离控制。研究了激励频率、电容能量、来流速度和激励位置对流动控制效果的影响以及阵列式激励的控制规律。实验结果表明:12路PSJs各路均能产生较强的冲击波和射流，能有效抑制翼型吸力面的流动分离，增加升力，推迟失速；当激励频率为150Hz使无量纲频率等于4.8时，流动控制效果最好；电容能量越大，来流速度越小，流动控制效果越好；翼型距前缘15%c处为最佳激励位置，在主翼后缘施加激励与前缘激励类似，能有效抑制主翼流动分离；在主翼前缘和后缘同时施加激励，增升效果变强，推迟失速的能力降低。流场存在延迟效应，延迟时间不小于585s。

关键词: 等离子体合成射流；高升力翼型；流动分离；多路放电

Abstract: Plasma synthetic jet (PSJ) has fast response， broad frequency band and great intensity with vast application prospects in lift enhancement and drag reduction of aircrafts. But conventional plasma synthetic jet can only work at one point with limited actuating range and control effect. To improve the capability of PSJ to suppress flow separation on airfoil， a new multichannel discharge circuit was designed to drive plasma synthetic jet actuators (PSJAs) and 5～12 PSJAs were driven with high strength by one power supply， which was used in flow separation control of a high-lift airfoil. The effects of actuation frequency， capacitance energy， free stream velocity and actuation location on the flow control results were investigated and the control rule of PSJ array was explored. Results show that， every channel of 12 channels’ PSJs can produce strong shock wave and jet flow， which suppress flow separation on the suction side of airfoil and increase lift and stall angle. The best flow control effect appears when actuation frequency is 150Hz with reduced frequency equal to 4.8. There are better flow control effects with greater capacitance energy and smaller free stream velocity and the best actuation location is 15%c downstream of the leading edge. Actuation at the trailing edge of main wing has similar effect as leading edge actuation， suppressing flow separation effectively while exerting actuation at both leading edge and tailing edge can increase more lift and less stall angle. There is also hysteresis effect with hysteresis time greater than 585s.

Key words: Plasma synthetic jet；High-lift airfoil；Flow separation；Multichannel discharge

苏志,李军,梁华,魏彪,陈杰. 多路等离子体合成射流改善翼型性能实验研究[J]. 推进技术, 2018, 39(9): 1928-1937.

SU Zhi,LI Jun,LIANG Hua,WEI Biao,CHEN Jie. Experimental Investigation of Enhancing Airfoil Aerodynamic Performance with Multichannel Plasma Synthetic Jet[J]. Journal of Propulsion Technology, 2018, 39(9): 1928-1937.

参考文献

[1] 李应红, 梁华, 马清源, 等. 脉冲等离子体气动激励抑制翼型吸力面流动分离的实验[J]. 航空学报, 2008, 29(6): 1429-1435.
[2] 李应红, 吴云, 梁华, 等. 提高抑制流动分离能力的等离子体冲击流动控制原理[J]. 科学通报, 2010, 55(31): 3060-3068.
[3] 吴云, 李应红. 等离子体流动控制研究进展与发展展望[J]. 航空学报, 2015, 36(2): 381-405.
[4] 魏彪, 梁华, 牛中国, 等. 三角翼微秒脉冲等离子体流动控制的试验研究[J]. 高电压技术, 2016, 42(3): 782-789.
[5] Roth J R, Sherman D M, Wilkinson S P. Boundary Layer Flow Control with a One Atmosphere Uniform Glow Discharge Surface Plasma[R]. AIAA 98-0328.
[6] 丁均梁, 吴云, 张海灯, 等. ?典型布局端壁等离子体激励抑制高负荷扩压叶珊角区分离实验[J]. ?空军工程大学学报(自然科学版), 2018, 19(4):?1-7.
[7] 宗豪华, 宋慧敏, 梁华, 等. 纳秒脉冲等离子体合成射流特性实验研究[J]. 推进技术, 2015, 36(10): 1474-1478. (ZONG Hao-hua, SONG Hui-min, LIANG Hua, et al. Experimental Study on Characteristic of Nanosecond Pulsed Plasma Synthetic Jet[J]. Journal of Propulsion Technology, 2015, 36(10): 1474-1478.)
[8] 程林, 孙姝, 谭慧俊, 等. 直缝式等离子体合成射流激励器特性的实验研究[J]. 推进技术, 2017, 38(9): 1937-1942. (CHENG Lin, SUN Shu, TAN Hui-jun, et al. Experimental Study on Characteristics of Plasma Synthetic Actuator with Normal Slot[J]. Journal of Propulsion Technology, 2017, 38(9): 1937-1942.)
[9] 刘汝兵, 孙伟, 牛中国, 等. 火花放电等离子体射流实验研究[J]. 推进技术, 2015, 36(3): 372-377. (LIU Ru-bing , SUN Wei, NIU Zhong-guo, et al. Experimental Investigation on Spark Discharge Plasma Jet[J]. Journal of Propulsion Technology, 2015, 36(3): 372-377.)
[10] 郝礼书, 乔志德. 合成射流用于翼型分离流动控制的研究[J]. 西北工业大学学报, 2006, 24(4): 528-531.
[11] 张攀峰, 王晋军. 合成射流控制 NACA0015翼型大攻角流动分离[J]. 北京航空航天大学学报, 2008, 34(4): 443-446.
[12] 张攀峰, 燕波, 戴晨峰. 合成射流环量控制翼型增升技术[J]. 中国科学:技术科学, 2012, 42(9): 1046-1053.
[13] 王林, 罗振兵, 夏智勋, 等. 合成双射流控制翼型分离流动的数值研究[J]. 空气动力学学报, 2012, 30(3): 353-357.
[14] Cybyk B Z, Wilkerson J T, Grossman K R. Performance Characteristics of the Sparkjet Flow Control Actuator[R]. AIAA 2004-2131.
[15] Narayanaswamy V, Shin J, Clemens N T, et al. Investigation of Plasma-Generated Jets for Supersonic Flow Control[R]. AIAA 2008-285.
[16] Narayanaswamy V, Rajia L, Clemens N T. Characterization of a High-Frequency Pulsed-Plasma Jet Actuator for Supersonic Flow Control[J]. AIAA Journal, 2010, 48(2): 297-305.
[17] Narayanaswamy V, Rajia L, Clemens N T. Control of Unsteadiness of a Shock Wave/Turbulent Boundary Layer Interaction by Using a Pulsed-Plasma-Jet Actuator[J]. Physics of Fluids, 2012, 24(7).
[18] Greene B R, Clemens N T, Micka D. Control of Shock Boundary Layer Interaction Using Pulsed Plasma Jets[R]. AIAA 2013-0405.
[19] Emerick T, Ali M Y, Foster C, et al. SparkJet Characterizations in Quiescent and Supersonic Flowfields[J]. Experiments in Fluids, 2014, 55(12).
[20] Emerick T M, Ali M Y, Foster C H, et al. SparkJet Actuator Characterization in Supersonic Crossflow[R]. AIAA 2012-2814.
[21] Caruana D, Philippe B, Gleyzes C. Separation Control with Plasma Synthetic Jet Actuators[J]. International Journal of Aerodynamics, 2013, 3(1-3): 71-83.
[22] 刘汝兵, 牛中国, 王萌萌, 等. 等离子体射流控制机翼气动力矩的实验研究[J]. 工程力学, 2016, 33(3): 232-238.
[23] Liu R B, Niu Z G, Wang M M, et al. Aerodynamic Control of NACA 0021 Airfoil Model with Spark Discharge Plasma Synthetic Jets[J]. Science China, 2015, 58(11): 1949-1955.
[24] 李洋, 梁华, 贾敏, 等. 等离子体合成射流改善翼型气动性能实验研究[J]. 推进技术, 2017, 38(9): 1943-1949. (LI Yang, LIANG Hua, JIA Min, et al. Experimental Investigation of Enhancing Wing Aerodynamic Performance by Plasma Synthetic Jet[J]. Journal of Propulsion Technology, 2017, 38(9): 1943-1949.)
[25] Zong H H, Cui W, Wu Y, et al. Influence of Capacitor Energy on Performance of a Three-Electrode Plasma Synthetic Jet Actuator[J]. Sensors and Actuators A: Physical, 2015, 222(1): 114–121.
[26] Hardy P, Barricau P, Belinger A, et al. Plasma Synthetic Jet for Flow Control[R]. AIAA 2010-5103.
[27] Zhang Z B, Wu Y, Sun Z Z, et al. Experimental Research on Multichannel Discharge Circuit and Multi-Electrode Plasma Synthetic Jet Actuator[J]. Journal of Physics, 2017, 50(16).
[28] Cui Y D, Zhao Z J, Zheng J G, et al. Flow Separation Control Over an NACA0015 Airfoil Using Nanosecond Pulsed Plasma Actuator[R]. AIAA 2017-0715.
[29] Little J, Nishihara M, Adamovich I V, et al. High-Lift Airfoil Trailing Edge Separation Control Using a Single Dielectric Barrier Discharge Plasma Actuator[J]. Experiments in Fluids, 2010, 48(3): 521-537.
[30] Little J, Samimy M. High-Lift Airfoil Separation with Dielectric Barrier Discharge Plasma Actuation[J]. AIAA Journal, 2010, 48(12): 2884-2898.　　　　　　　　　　　　　*　收稿日期:2017-10-19；修订日期:2017-11-01。基金项目:国家自然科学基金(51336011；51407197)；国防科技项目基金(2201058)；博士后科学基金(2014M562446)。通讯作者:苏志,男,硕士生,研究领域为等离子体流动控制与推进技术。E-mail: zhisuemail@163.com(编辑:梅瑛)