Effects of Turbulence?Models on CFD Simulations of Turbulent Jet

Journal of Propulsion Technology ›› 2016, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (6): 1049-1054.

Previous Articles Next Articles

Effects of Turbulence?Models on CFD Simulations of Turbulent Jet

Department of Energy Power and Mechanical Engineering，North China Electric Power University， Beijing 102206，China,Department of Energy Power and Mechanical Engineering，North China Electric Power University， Beijing 102206，China,Department of Energy Power and Mechanical Engineering，North China Electric Power University， Beijing 102206，China;North China University of Water Resources and Electric Power，Zhengzhou 450045，China and Department of Energy Power and Mechanical Engineering，North China Electric Power University， Beijing 102206，China

Published:2021-08-15

湍流模型对湍流射流CFD模拟的影响

张仪¹,王晓东¹,胡昊^1,2,康顺¹

华北电力大学能源动力与机械工程学院，北京 102206,华北电力大学能源动力与机械工程学院，北京 102206,华北电力大学能源动力与机械工程学院，北京 102206; 华北水利水电大学，河南郑州 450045,华北电力大学能源动力与机械工程学院，北京 102206

作者简介:张仪，男，博士生，研究领域为湍流射流的数值模拟。E-mail: ncepu_zy@163.com 通讯作者:王晓东，男，博士，副教授。研究领域为热机气动热力学。
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金(51206052)。

Abstract

Abstract: Due to the complex vortex structure in Jet in cross-flow (JICF)，turbulence model has significant influence on the CFD simulations of JICF. Four turbulence models including S-A，Realizable k-ε，k-ω and SST k-ω are compared in the simulations of JICF under the blowing ratios of 0.5 and 1.5，respectively. The simulation results are validated by comparing with experimental data. The effects of vorticity tensor and strain tensor on turbulence production are analyzed. The simulation results show that four turbulence models can give satisfing prediction for the flow structure downstream of jets. Under the low blowing ratio，the S-A model performs best in general. Under the high blowing ratio，the k-ω model results are among the most accurate.

Key words: Jet in cross-flow；Blowing ratio；Numerical simulation；Turbulence model

摘要： 横流中的湍流射流涡旋结构复杂，湍流模型对其模拟结果影响很大。采用S-A，Realizable k-ε，k-ω和SST k-ω四种湍流模型对吹风比为0.5和1.5工况下的横流中射流进行了数值模拟研究。与实验值比较验证了数值模拟结果的可信性。分析了旋转张量和剪切张量对湍流生成的影响。发现四种湍流模型对下游速度分布的预测均较为准确，在小吹风比下S-A模型性能最好；在大吹风比下k-ω模型较为准确。

关键词: 横流中的射流；吹风比；数值模拟；湍流模型

ZHANG Yi¹,WANG Xiao-dong¹,HU Hao^1,2,KANG Shun¹. Effects of Turbulence?Models on CFD Simulations of Turbulent Jet[J]. Journal of Propulsion Technology, 2016, 37(6): 1049-1054.

张仪,王晓东,胡昊,康顺. 湍流模型对湍流射流CFD模拟的影响[J]. 推进技术, 2016, 37(6): 1049-1054.

References

[1] 王晓东, 康顺. 涡轮叶栅前缘槽缝气膜冷却的数值模拟[J]. 工程热物理学报. 2008, 29(11): 1835-1838.
[2] 洪博文, 温风波, 王松涛, 等. 气冷涡轮前缘冷气射流角度优化研究[J]. 推进技术, 2014, 35(12): 1653-1660. (HONG Bo-wen, WEN Feng-bo, WANG Song-tao, et al. Optimization Research of Cooling Gas Injection Angle at Leading Edge of Air-Cooled Turbine[J]. Journal of Propulsion Technology, 2014, 35(12): 1653-1660.)
[3] 陈方, 陈立红, 张新宇. 超声速燃烧室凹腔火焰稳定器的数值模拟[J]. 推进技术, 2007, 28(2): 135-140. (CHEN Fang, CHEN Li-hong, ZHANG Xin-yu. Numerical Studies on Cavity Flame Holders for Supersonic Combustors[J]. Journal of Propulsion Technology, 2007, 28(2): 135-140.)
[4] 孙海俊, 曾卓雄, 徐义华, 等. 横向射流对凹腔湍流特性影响的数值模拟[J]. 推进技术, 2014, 35(1):54-61. (SUN Hai-jun, ZENG Zhuo-xiong, XU Yi-hua, et al. Numerical Simulation of Transverse Injection on Turbulence Characteristics in Cavity[J]. Journal of Propulsion Technology, 2014, 35(1): 54-61.)
[5] 陈著, 单勇, 沈锡钢, 等. 射流控制反推力装置流场数值研究[J]. 推进技术, 2014, 35(9): 1181-1187. (CHEN Zhu, SHAN Yong, SHEN Xi-gang, et al. Numerical Study on Thrust Reverser Controlled with Secondary Flow[J]. Journal of Propulsion Technology, 2014, 35(9): 1181-1187.)
[6] 冯岩岩, 宋彦萍, 刘华坪, 等. 不同攻角下端壁射流旋涡控制扩压叶栅分离流动研究[J]. 推进技术, 2015, 36(1): 54-61. (FENG Yan-yan, SONG Yan-ping, LIU Hua-ping, et al. Effect of End-Wall Vortex Generator Jet on Flow Separation Control in Compressor Cascade under Different Angles of Attack[J]. Journal of Propulsion Technology, 2015, 36(1): 54-61.)
[7] Fric T F, Roshko A. Vortical Structure in the Wake of a Transverse Jet[J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 1994, 279: 1-47.
[8] Prasad K, Sumanta A. Modal Analysis of Inclined Film Cooling Jet Flow[J]. ASME Journal of Turbomachinery, 2014, 136(8): 081007.
[9] Sau R, Mahesh K. Dynamics and Mixing of Vortex Rings in Crossflow[J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 2008, 604: 389-409.
[10] 张晓元, 李炜, 李长城. 横流环境中射流的数值研究[J]. 水利学报, 2002, 3: 32-38.
[11] 郭婷婷, 李少华, 徐忠. 横向紊动射流流场结构的数值分析[J]. 中国电机工程学报, 2003, 23(7): 191-195.
[12] 李国能, 周昊, 杨华, 等. 横流中湍流射流的数值研究[J]. 中国电机工程学报, 2007, 27(2): 87-91.
[13] Wang X D, Li Z, Liang J Y, et al. Numerical Simulations of Imperfect Bifurcation of Jet in Crossflow[J]. Engineering Applications of Computational Fluid Mechanics, 2012, 6(4): 595-607.
[14] 李煦枳, 李椿萱. RANS方法对横流中的单孔射流的数值模拟[C]. 烟台:第十五届全国计算流体力学会议, 2012: 908-913.
[15] 吴海玲, 陈听宽. 应用不同紊流模型对二维横向射流传热数值模拟研究[J]. 西安交通大学学报, 2001, 35(9): 903-907.
[16] 郭婷婷, 李少华, 徐忠. 两种近壁湍流模式对横向紊动射流尾流场的影响[J]. 水动力学研究与进展(A辑), 2006, 21(1): 20-25.
[17] Ajersch P, Zhou J M, Ketler S, et al. Multiple Jets in a Crossflow: Detailed Measurements and Numerical Simulations [J]. ASME Journal of Turbomachinery, 1997, 119: 330-341.
[18] Chen H C, Patel V C. Near-Wall Turbulence Models for Complex Flows Including Separation[J]. AIAA Journal, 1988, 26(6): 641-648.
[19] Kader B. Temperature and Concentration Profiles in Fully Turbulent Boundary Layers[J]. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 1981, 24(9): 1541-1544.
[20] Mariani J D, Zilliac G G, Chow J S, et al. Numerical/Experimental Study of a Wingtip Vortex in the Near Field[J]. AIAA Journal, 1995, 33(9): 1561-1568. 　　　　　　　　　　　　　*　收稿日期:2015-01-07；修订日期:2015-04-16。基金项目:国家自然科学基金(51206052)。作者简介:张仪,男,博士生,研究领域为湍流射流的数值模拟。E-mail: ncepu_zy@163.com通讯作者:王晓东,男,博士,副教授。研究领域为热机气动热力学。E-mail: wangxd@ncepu.edu.cn(编辑:史亚红)

Effects of Turbulence?Models on CFD Simulations of Turbulent Jet

湍流模型对湍流射流CFD模拟的影响

PDF

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

References

Related Articles 0

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments