液体火箭发动机诱导轮空化热力学效应研究

doi:10.13675/j.cnki.tjjs.190139

推进技术 ›› 2020, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (4): 812-819.DOI: 10.13675/j.cnki.tjjs.190139

液体火箭发动机诱导轮空化热力学效应研究

项乐¹，陈晖¹，谭永华^1,2，刘诗鑫³，许开富³，张亚太¹

1.西安航天动力研究所，液体火箭发动机技术重点实验室，陕西西安 710100;2.航天推进技术研究院，陕西西安 710100;3.西安航天动力研究所，陕西西安 710100

发布日期:2021-08-15
基金资助:
国家重大基础研究项目（613321）。

Study of Cavitation Thermodynamic Effect of Liquid Rocket Engine Inducer

1.Science and Technology on Liquid Rocket Engine Laboratory,Xi’an Aerospace Propulsion Institute，Xi’an 710100,China;2.Academy of Aerospace Propulsion Technology，Xi’an 710100,China;3.Xi’an Aerospace Propulsion Institute，Xi’an 710100,China

Published:2021-08-15

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为了研究空化热力学效应，以模型诱导轮为研究对象，改变流量、水温等条件，对其内部空化流动进行了可视化实验研究，完整记录了从空化初生至性能断裂点各工况的空化区形态。结果表明：温度对诱导轮无空化水力性能没有显著影响，但是高温下诱导轮的空化性能断裂点被显著延后，体现了热力学效应的影响。对比不同温度下的空化区形态，发现热力学效应的强弱与流动工况密切相关，在小空化数下体现得更为显著。同时引入一种半经验的理论模型预测热效应对空化性能的影响，小流量（Φ=0.071）下预测结果与实验结果平均偏差为5.5%，大流量（Φ=0.088）下平均偏差为10.8%，验证了模型在本文应用条件下的可靠性。

关键词: 液体火箭发动机;诱导轮;空化;热力学效应;可视化

Abstract: To study the cavitation thermodynamic effect, a series of visualization experiments of the cavitating flow inside a model inducer were carried out under different flow coefficients and temperatures, the cavitation structures were documented integrally from the inception point to the breakdown point. It is found that temperature shows little influence on the non-cavitation hydraulic performance, but the breakdown point is remarkably delayed at high temperatures, indicating the influence of the thermodynamic effect. The comparison of cavitation structures at different temperatures implies that the strength of thermodynamic effect is closely related to the flow condition and it is more conspicuous at smaller cavitation numbers. At last, a semi-empirical theoretical model was introduced to predict the influence of thermodynamic effect on the cavitation performance. The averaged deviation between predicted and experimental results is 5.5% at small flow condition (Φ=0.071). The averaged deviation is 10.8% for the larger flow condition (Φ=0.088). Thus the validity of the predicted model is verified in the investigated conditions in this study.

Key words: Liquid rocket engine;Inducer;Cavitation;Thermodynamic effect;Visualization

项乐，陈晖，谭永华，刘诗鑫，许开富，张亚太. 液体火箭发动机诱导轮空化热力学效应研究[J]. 推进技术, 2020, 41(4): 812-819.

XIANG Le¹, CHEN Hui¹, TAN Yong-hua^1,2, LIU Shi-xin³, XU Kai-fu³, ZHANG Ya-tai¹. Study of Cavitation Thermodynamic Effect of Liquid Rocket Engine Inducer[J]. Journal of Propulsion Technology, 2020, 41(4): 812-819.

参考文献

[1] Tsujimoto Y, Yoshida Y， Maekawa Y， et al. Observations of Oscillating Cavitation of an Inducer[J]. Journal of Fluid Engnieering， 1997， 119(4): 775-781.
[2] 陈晖，李斌，张恩昭，等. 液体火箭发动机高转速诱导轮旋转空化[J]. 推进技术， 2009， 30(4): 390-395.
[3] 谭永华. 大推力液体火箭发动机研究[J]. 宇航学报， 2013， 34(10)： 1303-1308.
[4] 项乐，陈晖，谭永华，等. 诱导轮空化热力学效应实验研究进展[C]. 北京:第11届全国水力机械及其系统学术年会， 2018.
[5] Stahl H A， Stepanoff A J. Thermodynamic Aspects of Cavitation in Centrifugal Pumps [J]. Journal of Basic Engineering， 1956， 78： 1691-1693.
[6] Ruggeri R S， Moore R D. Method for Prediction of Pump Cavitation Performance for Various Liquids， Temperature Liquid， and Rotative Speeds[R]. NASA-TN-D-5292， 1969.
[7] Ball C L， Meng P R. Cavitation Performance of 84° Helical Pump Inducer Operated in 37°R and 42°R Liquid Hydrogen[R]. NASA TM X-1360， 1967.
[8] Meng P R， Moore R D. Cavitation and Noncavitation Performance of 78° Helical Inducer in Hydrogen[R]. NASA TM X-2131， 1968.
[9] Kovich G. Comparison of Predicted and Experimental Cavitation Performance of 84° Helical Inducer in Water and Hydrogen[R]. NASA TN D-7016， 1970.
[10] Franc J P， Rebattet C， Coulon A. An Experimental Investigation of Thermal Effects in a Cavitating Inducer[J]. Journal of Fluid Engineering， 2004， 126(5): 716-723.
[11] Franc J P， Rebattet C， Coulon A， et al. Thermodynamic Effect on Cavitating Inducer Part II: On-Board Measurements of Temperature Depression within Leading Edge Cavities[J]. Journal of Fluid Engineering， 2010， 132(2).
[12] Yoshida Y， Kikuta K， Hasegawa S， et al. Thermodynamic Effect on a Cavitating Inducer in Liquid Nitrogen[J]. Journal of Fluid Engineering， 2007， 129(3): 273-278.
[13] Ito Y， Tsunoda A， Kurishita Y， et al. Experimental Visualization of Cryogenic Backflow Vortex Cavitation with Thermodynamic Effects[J]. Journal of Propulsion and Power， 2016， 32(1): 71-82.
[14] Cervone A， Testa R， Agostino L， et al. Thermal Effects on Cavitation Instabilities in Helical Inducers[J]. Journal of Propulsion and Power， 2005， 21(5): 893-899.
[15] Pace G， Valentini D， Pasini A， et al. Analysis of Flow Instabilities on a Three-Bladed Axial Inducer in Fixed and Rotating Frames[J]. Journal of Fluid Engineering， 2018， 141(4).
[16] Ehrlich D A， Schwille J A， Welle R P， et al. A Water Test Facility Liquid Rocket Engine Turbopump Cavitation Testing[C]. Ann Arbor: Proceedings of the 7th International Symposium on Cavitation， 2009.
[17] Ehrlich D A， Murdock J W. A Dimensionless Scaling Parameter for Thermal Effects on Cavitation in Turbopump Inducers[J]. Journal of Fluid Engnieering， 2015， 137(4).
[18] Kim J， Song S J. Measurement of Thermal Parameter and Reynolds Number Effects on Cavitation Instability Onset in a Turbopump Inducer[J]. Journal of the Global Power and Propulsion Society， 2017， (1): 157-170.
[19] Li X， Li J， Wang J. Study on Cavitation Instabilities in a Three-Bladed Inducer[J]. Journal of Propulsion and Power， 2015， 31(4): 1051-1056.
[20] 崔宝玲，陈杰，李晓俊，等. 高速诱导轮离心泵内空化发展可视化实验与数值模拟[J]. 农业机械学报， 2018， 49(4): 148-155.
[21] 潘中永，袁寿其. 泵空化基础[M]. 镇江：江苏大学出版社， 2013.
[22] Lemmon E W， McLinden M O， Huber M L. Reference Fluid Thermodynamic and Transport Properties[DB]. USA: NIST Standard Database 23 (version 9.1， 2013)

液体火箭发动机诱导轮空化热力学效应研究

Study of Cavitation Thermodynamic Effect of Liquid Rocket Engine Inducer

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 0

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价