低雷诺数下双元素翼帆的襟翼几何参数对其推进特性影响研究

doi:10.13675/j.cnki.tjjs.200110

推进技术 ›› 2020, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (11): 2613-2622.DOI: 10.13675/j.cnki.tjjs.200110

低雷诺数下双元素翼帆的襟翼几何参数对其推进特性影响研究

李臣^1,2,3，孙培廷¹

1.大连海事大学轮机工程学院，辽宁大连 116026;2.江苏海事职业技术学院轮机电气与智能工程学院，江苏南京 211170;3.江苏船舶节能减排工程技术研究中心，江苏南京 211170

出版日期:2020-11-15 发布日期:2020-11-15
基金资助:
江苏海事职业技术学院科创基金（kjcx-1907）；千帆新锐项目（014070）。

Effects of Flap Geometry Parameters on Propulsion Characteristics of Two-Elements Wingsail at Low Reynolds Number

1.Marine Engineering College，Dalian Maritime University，Dalian 116026，China;2.College of Marine，Electrical and Intelligent Engineering，Jiangsu Maritime Institute，Nanjing 211170，China;3.Jiangsu Ship Energy Saving Engineering Technology Center，Nanjing 211170，China

Online:2020-11-15 Published:2020-11-15

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为了研究大型船舶在航行中翼帆对其推进性能的影响规律，建立了一种双元素翼帆模型，并采用雷诺平均N-S方程在定常和非定常工况下对襟翼几何参数变化的模型进行数值仿真。结果表明，双元素翼帆气动特性的改变体现了襟翼旋转轴位置、襟翼偏转角以及缝隙宽度之间的非线性耦合作用。襟翼旋转轴位置的前移实际上是增大了缝隙宽度，进而增加了流过缝隙的流体，避免了主翼尾流的流动分离。然而，襟翼旋转轴位置的前移距离也受到襟翼偏转角的限制，在襟翼偏转角为25°，攻角为6°，当襟翼旋转轴位置由90%前移到85%时，襟翼吸力面发生了大尺度流动分离。襟翼旋转轴位置不宜过于靠前或靠后，当相对缝隙宽度为2.4%时，襟翼旋转轴位置为85%较为合理。

关键词: 双元素翼帆;襟翼偏转角;襟翼旋转轴位置;失速角;数值模拟

Abstract: In order to study the effects of the wingsail on the propulsion performance of a large ship， a two-elements wingsail model is established. Then the Reynolds average N-S equation is used to simulate the model with different geometric parameters of flap under steady and unsteady conditions. The results show that the change of aerodynamic characteristics of the two-elements wingsail reflects the nonlinear coupling among the position of the flap rotating axis， the flap deflection angle and the slot width. The forward movement of the flap rotating axis actually increases the gap width. Furthermore， the fluid flowing through the slot increased to avoid the flow separation of the wing wake. However， the forward displacement of the flap rotating axis is also limited by the flap deflection angle. When the deflection angle of the flap is 25° and the angle of attack is 6°， with the rotating axis position of the flap moving forward from 90% to 85%， large-scale flow separation occurs on the flap suction surface. Therefore the rotating axis position of the flap should not be too forward or backward. When the relative slot width is 2.4%， it is more reasonable to set the rotating axis position of the flap is 85%.

Key words: Two-elements wingsail;Flap deflection angle;Rotating axis position of the flap;Stall angle;Numerical simulation

李臣，孙培廷. 低雷诺数下双元素翼帆的襟翼几何参数对其推进特性影响研究[J]. 推进技术, 2020, 41(11): 2613-2622.

LI Chen^1,2,3, SUN Pei-ting¹. Effects of Flap Geometry Parameters on Propulsion Characteristics of Two-Elements Wingsail at Low Reynolds Number[J]. Journal of Propulsion Technology, 2020, 41(11): 2613-2622.

参考文献

[1] 郑鑫. 双尾襟翼帆的设计及其气动特性研究［D］. 镇江：江苏科技大学， 2017.
[2] 王迪. 风翼柴油机混合动力船舶运动控制研究［D］. 大连：大连海事大学， 2018.
[3] Widnall， Sheila， Hayden C， et al. Effects of Spanwise Flexibility on Lift and Rolling Moment of a Wingsail［EB/OL］. http：//hdl.handle.net/1721.1/92344， 2014-07-06.
[4] 王献孚，黄锦文，潘卫明. 可控环量船用翼的数值模拟和试验研究［J］. 水动力学研究与进展. 1992， 7（1）： 36-41.
[5] Seifert A， Bachar T， Koss D， et al. Oscillatory Blowing： A Tool to Delay Boundary-Layer Separation［J］. AIAA Journal， 1993， 31（11）： 2052-2060.
[6] Seifert A， Darabi A， Wygnanski I. Delay of Airfoil Stall by Periodic Excitation［J］. Journal of Aircraft， 1996， 33（4）： 691-698.
[7] Dalija M， Branko K. Wing Sails for Hybrid Propulsion of a Ship［J］. Journal of Sustainable Development of Energy Water and Environment Systems， 2016， 4（1）： 1-13.
[8] Marine B. E-Ship1 with Sailing Rotors to Reduce Fuel Costs and to Reduce Emissions［EB/OL］. https：//www.marinebuzz.com， 2008-09-16.
[9] Borglund D， Kuttenkeuler J. Active Wing Flutter Suppression Using a Trailing Flap［J］. Journal of Fluids and Structures， 2002， 16（3）： 271-294.
[10] 林煜翔. 风力助航船舶襟翼帆的设计研究［D］. 大连：大连海事大学， 2013.
[11] Burden A， Hearn G E， Lloyd T， et al. Fast Sail Assisted Feeder Container Ship［EB/OL］. https：//www.researchgate.net/publication/277728973， 2010-05-07.
[12] Li Qiao， Niheia Y， Nakashima T， et a1. A Study on the Performance of Cascade Hard Sails and Sail-Equipped Vessels［J］. Ocean Engineering， 2015， 98（4）： 23-31.
[13] Fish F E， Battle J M， Hydrodynamic Design of the Humpback Whale Flipper［J］. Journal of Morphology， 1995， 225 （1）： 51–60.
[14] Blakeley A W， Flay R G J， Richards P J. Design and Optimisation of Multi-Element Wing Sails for Multihull Yachts［C］. Australia： 18th Australasian Fluid Mechanics Conference， 2012.
[15] Daniel W A. The CFD Assisted Design and Experimental Testing of a Wingsail with High Lift Devices［D］. England： University of Salford， 1996.
[16] Fujiwara T， Hirata K， Ueno M， et al. On Aerodynamic Characteristics of a Hybrid-Sail with Square Soft Sail［C］. Honolulu： Proceedings of the International Offshore and Polar Engineering Conference， 2003.
[17] Fujiwara T， Hirata K， Ueno M， et al. On the Development of High-Performance Sails for an Ocean-Going Sailing Ship［C］. Kanazawa： Proceedings of the International Conference on Marine Simulation and Ship Manoeuvrability， 2003.
[18] Vincent C， Nicolas G， Nicolas V. Aerodynamic Study of a Two-Elements Wingsail for High Performance Multihull Yachts［C］. Auckland： 5th High Performance Yacht Design Conference， 2015.
[19] Alessandro F， Nicolas G， Vincent C. Numerical and Experimental Analysis of the Flow Around a Two-Element Wingsail at Reynolds Number 0.53×10⁶［J］. International Journal of Heat and Fluid Flow， 2016， 62（12）： 538-551.
[20] 王宏明，吴桂涛，杨昺崧. 基于 CFD 的风帆助航技术效能分析［J］. 中国造船， 2011， 52（2）： 25-33.
[21] Menter F R. Two-Equation Eddy-Viscosity Turbulence Models for Engineering Applications［J］. AIAA Journal， 1994， 32（8）： 1598-1605.
[22] Hassan G E， Hassan A， Youssef M E. Numerical Investigation of Medium Range Re Number Aerodynamics Characteristics for NACA0018 Airfoil［J］. CFD Letters， 2014， 6（4）： 175-187.
[23] Malan P， Suluksna K， Juntasaro E. Calibrating the γ-Re-θ Transition Model for Commercial CFD［C］. Japan： 47th AIAA Aerospace Science Meeting， 2009.
[24] Douvi C E， Tsavalos I A， Margaris P D. Evaluation of the Turbulence Models for the Simulation of the Flow Over a National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics （NACA） 0012 Airfoil［J］. Journal of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering Research， 2012， 4（3）： 100-111.
[25] Abhijit H S. Design， Analysis and Development of a Morphable Wing Structure for Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Performance Augmentation［D］. USA： University of Texas at Arlington in Partial Fulfillment， 1971.

低雷诺数下双元素翼帆的襟翼几何参数对其推进特性影响研究

Effects of Flap Geometry Parameters on Propulsion Characteristics of Two-Elements Wingsail at Low Reynolds Number

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 0

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价