固体火箭超燃冲压发动机燃烧性能影响因素研究

doi:10.13675/j.cnki.tjjs.200124

推进技术 ›› 2021, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (3): 638-646.DOI: 10.13675/j.cnki.tjjs.200124

固体火箭超燃冲压发动机燃烧性能影响因素研究

朱韶华，梁磊，秦飞，魏祥庚，叶进颖

西北工业大学燃烧、热结构与内流场重点实验室，陕西西安 710072

出版日期:2021-03-15 发布日期:2021-08-15
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金（51676165；52006181）。

Influence Factors of Combustion Performance of Solid Rocket Scramjet Engine

Science and Technology on Combustion Internal Flow and Thermo-Structure Laboratory， Northwestern Polytechnical University，Xi’an 710072，China

Online:2021-03-15 Published:2021-08-15

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为了获得以飞行马赫数5.5巡航工作的固体火箭超燃冲压发动机燃烧性能影响因素，开展了地面直连试验和数值模拟研究。利用数值手段研究了固体燃气喷注方式、扰流装置的形式以及燃烧室扩张比等因素对燃烧室性能的影响规律，获得了高燃烧效率（≥90%）的壁面垂直喷注式发动机燃烧室构型。研究表明：（1）壁面垂直喷注方式能增强富燃燃气与空气的掺混效果，颗粒相的燃烧效率较中心支板式双火箭燃烧室构型提高了25%。（2）对比不同级数的扰流装置对发动机性能影响，同时考虑扰流装置热防护问题和发动机结构复杂程度，双级扰流装置的扰流形式增强效果较优，颗粒相的燃烧效率较单级扰流装置的燃烧室构型方案提高了26%。（3）对比不同燃烧室扩张比对发动机性能影响，扩张比为1.6的燃烧室构型方案颗粒相的燃烧效率为95%。综上所述，通过优化得到了壁面垂直喷注方式、双级扰流装置以及燃烧室扩张比为1.6的高燃烧效率的发动机燃烧室构型。

关键词: 固体火箭;超燃冲压发动机;燃烧性能;扰流装置;颗粒相

Abstract: Ground direct-connected experiments and numerical simulations were carried out to obtain the influence factors of the combustion performance of the solid rocket scramjet operating in cruise mode at flight Mach number 5.5. The effects of the injection mode of the fuel-rich gas， stages of the turbulence device and the expansion ratio of combustor on the performance of combustor were studied by numerical method. A combustor configuration with a vertical injection mode was found to be with a high combustion efficiency （≥90%）. The results show that：（1） The vertical injection mode could enhance the mixing process of fuel-rich gas and air， and the combustion efficiency of particle phase was 25% higher than that of the central-strut with dual-rockets configuration. （2） The effects of different number of turbulence device stages on engine performance were compared. As thermal protection of turbulence devices and the complexity of engine structure were considered， the combustor with double stages turbulence devices was considered to be the best choice. The combustion efficiency of the particle phase in this combustor was 26% higher than that of the combustor with a single-stage turbulence device. （3） The effects of different combustor expansion ratios on engine performance were compared. The combustion efficiency of the particle phase was 95% when the expansion ratio of the combustor was 1.6. In conclusion， a combustor with a vertical injection mode， double-staged turbulence device and a combustor expansion ratio of 1.6 were optimized with high combustion efficiency.

Key words: Solid rocket;Scramjet engine;Combustion performance;Turbulence device;Particle phase

朱韶华，梁磊，秦飞，魏祥庚，叶进颖. 固体火箭超燃冲压发动机燃烧性能影响因素研究[J]. 推进技术, 2021, 42(3): 638-646.

ZHU Shao-hua, LIANG Lei, QIN Fei, WEI Xiang-geng, YE Jin-ying. Influence Factors of Combustion Performance of Solid Rocket Scramjet Engine[J]. Journal of Propulsion Technology, 2021, 42(3): 638-646.

参考文献

[1] Heiser W H， Pratt D T， Deley D H. Hypersonic Air Breathing Propulsion［M］. Reston： American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics， 1994.
[2] Curran E T. Scramjet Engines： The First Forty Years［J］. Journal of Propulsion and Power， 2001， 17（6）： 1138-1148.
[3] Curran E T， Murthy S N B. Scramjet Propulsion［M］. Reston： American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics， 2000.
[4] 胡冬冬，刘晓明，张绍芳，等. 2016年国外高超声速飞行器技术发展综述［J］. 战术导弹技术， 2017，（1）： 28-33.
[5] Hallion R P. The History of Hypersonics： or， ‘Back to the Future： Again and Again’［R］. AIAA 2005-329.
[6] 张岩，朱韶华，刘刚，等. 双模态冲压发动机中的模态转换研究综述［J］. 推进技术， 2013， 34（12）： 1719-1728.
[7] Witt M A. Investigation into the Feasibility of Using Solid Fuel Ramjets for High Supersonic/Low Hypersonic Tactical Missiles［D］. California： Naval Postgraduate School， 1989.
[8] Angus M J. An Investigation into the Performance Characteristics of a Solid Fuel Scramjet Propulsion Device［D］. California： Naval Postgraduate School， 1991.
[9] Ben-Yakar A. Investigation of the Combustion of Solid Fuel at Supersonic Conditions in a Ramjet Engine［D］. Israel： Israel Institute of Technology， 1995.
[10] Ben-Yakar A， Benveniste N， Alon G. Investigation of a Solid Fuel Scramjet Combustor［J］. Journal of Propulsion and Power， 1998， 14（4）： 447-455.
[11] Cohen-Zur A， Benveniste N. Experimental Investigation of a Supersonic Combustion Solid Fuel Ramjet［J］. Journal of Propulsion and Power， 1998， 14（6）： 880-889.
[12] Saraf S， Gany A. Testing Metallized Solid Fuel Scramjet Combustion［R］. ISABE 2007-1176.
[13] 马立坤，李潮隆，夏智勋，等. 带凹腔火焰稳定器的固体火箭超燃冲压发动机燃烧室试验研究［J］. 推进技术， 2020， 42（2）.
[14] Lu Zhong， Xia Zhixun， Liu Bing， et al. Experimental and Numerical Investigation of a Solid-Fuel Rocket Scramjet Combustor［J］. Journal of Propulsion and Power， 2016， 32（2）： 273-278.
[15] 赵翔，夏智勋，马立坤，等. 固体火箭超燃冲压发动机地面直连试验［J］. 航空兵器， 2018，（4）： 57-61.
[16] 李轩，马利锋，赵永涛，等. 固体火箭超燃冲压发动机性能数值模拟研究［J］. 弹箭与制导学报， 2014， 34（1）： 104-109.
[17] Liu Yang， Gao Yonggang， Shi Lei， et al. Preliminary Experimental Study on Solid Rocket Fuel Gas Scramjet［J］. Acta Astronautica， 2018， 153： 146-153.
[18] 王德全. 固体火箭冲压发动机补燃室粒子沉积与绝热层烧蚀过程研究［D］. 长沙：国防科技大学， 2009.
[19] Menter F R. Two-Equation Eddy-Viscosity Turbulence Models for Engineering Applications［J］. AIAA Journal， 1994， 32（8）： 1598-1605.
[20] 游进. 弹用超声速进气道/补燃室及其一体化数值模拟研究［D］. 长沙：国防科技大学， 2005.
[21] 胡建新. 含硼推进剂固体火箭冲压发动机补燃室工作过程研究［D］. 长沙：国防科技大学， 2006.

固体火箭超燃冲压发动机燃烧性能影响因素研究

Influence Factors of Combustion Performance of Solid Rocket Scramjet Engine

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 0

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价