转子叶片加工误差对1.5级跨声速压气机气动性能的影响

doi:10.13675/j.cnki.tjjs.200424

推进技术 ›› 2021, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (1): 139-148.DOI: 10.13675/j.cnki.tjjs.200424

转子叶片加工误差对1.5级跨声速压气机气动性能的影响

耿少娟^1,2,3,4，张小玉^1,2,3，丁林超^1,2,3，王文涛^1,2,3，卞祥德^1,2,3，石书成^1,2,3

1.中国科学院工程热物理研究所先进燃气轮机实验室，北京 100190;2.中国科学院先进能源动力重点实验室，北京 100190;3.中国科学院轻型动力创新研究院，北京 100190;4.中国科学院大学工程科学学院，北京 100049

出版日期:2021-01-15 发布日期:2021-01-15
基金资助:
国家科技重大专项（2017-II-0007-0021；2017-II-0006-0020）。

Effects of Rotor Blade Manufacturing Variability on 1.5 Stage Transonic Compressor Aerodynamic Performance

1.Advanced Gas Turbine Laboratory，Institute of Engineering Thermophysics，Chinese Academy of Sciences， Beijing 100190，China;2.Key Laboratory of Advanced Energy and Power，Chinese Academy of Sciences，Beijing 100190，China;3.Innovation Academy for Light-Duty Gas Turbine，Chinese Academy of Sciences，Beijing 100190，China;4.School of Engineering Science，University of Chinese Academy of Sciences，Beijing 100049，China

Online:2021-01-15 Published:2021-01-15

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 压气机叶片加工误差不可避免，将在一定程度上影响压气机的气动性能。为研究叶片加工误差对跨声速压气机气动性能的影响，以燃气轮机进口1.5级跨声速压气机为对象，通过三坐标测量跨声速转子叶片叶型数据，获得了加工误差分布特征；针对实测转子叶片，采用三维CFD数值模拟方法，研究了轮廓度、位置度和扭转角综合误差对压气机转子和级特性线和流场参数的影响；针对转子叶型以轮廓度超差为主的特点，采用S2流面通流计算方法，在设计流量点研究了由轮廓度误差引起的转子叶型最大厚度变化对压气机转子和级性能的影响。结果表明，转子叶片加工误差对压气机堵塞流量、全流量范围内转子和级的压比和效率均有影响，同时改变转静子叶片排出口气流参数的径向分布规律，主要原因为激波位置和强度的变化；在设计流量点，转子和级的压比和效率的变化与最大厚度变化呈负相关趋势，厚度偏差越大性能变化幅度越大；对转子叶片，来流相对马赫数随叶片高度增加而增大，性能对叶型几何误差的敏感性增强，综合压比和效率的变化，中上部叶高范围的轮廓度公差要求应更严格。

关键词: 加工误差;轮廓度;跨声速压气机;气动性能;数值模拟

Abstract: Manufacturing variability of compressor blade is inevitable， which may affect the compressor aerodynamic performance to some extent. The inlet 1.5 stage transonic compressor of a gasturbine was selected to investigate the effects of blade manufacturing variability on the aerodynamic performance of transonic compressor. The surface coordinates of machined rotor blades were measured， and the distribution features of manufacuring variability are obtained. For the measured blades， the three dimensional CFD numerical simulation method was adopted to investigate the effects of compound variability including profile， position and twist angle on the performance curves and flow fields of compressor stage and rotor. For the case that manufacturing variability is dominated by profile error， the maximum thickness of blade profile will change correspondingly. The through flow method in S2 surface was utilized to study the effects of maximum thickness change on the compressor stage and rotor performance at design mass flow rate. The results demonstrate that the manufacturing variability of rotor blade will affect the compressor choke mass rate， the total pressure ratio and efficiency of stage and rotor within the whole flow range. The radial profiles of flow parameters at rotor and stator blade outlets are also changed. The results are mainly due to the changes of shock wave position and strength. At design mass flow rate， the changes of total pressure ratio and efficiency of stage and rotor are negatively related with the variation of profile maximum thickness. The changes of performance increase with the increase of thickness error. For rotor blades， the inlet relative Mach number increases from blade root to tip， the sensitivities of performance to geometric variability strengthen. Considering the comprehensive changes of total pressure ratio and efficiency， the tight tolorence of blade profile within middle and tip height shoud be imposed.

Key words: Manufacturing variability;Blade profile;Transonic compressor;Aerodynamic performance;Numerical simulation

耿少娟，张小玉，丁林超，王文涛，卞祥德，石书成. 转子叶片加工误差对1.5级跨声速压气机气动性能的影响[J]. 推进技术, 2021, 42(1): 139-148.

GENG Shao-juan^1,2,3,4, ZHANG Xiao-yu^1,2,3, DING Lin-chao^1,2,3, WANG Wen-tao^1,2,3, BIAN Xiang-de^1,2,3, SHI Shu-cheng^1,2,3. Effects of Rotor Blade Manufacturing Variability on 1.5 Stage Transonic Compressor Aerodynamic Performance[J]. Journal of Propulsion Technology, 2021, 42(1): 139-148.

参考文献

[1] Larosiliere L M， Wood J R， Hathaway M D， et al. Aerodynamic Design Study of Advanced Mulitstage Axial Compressor［R］. NASA TP-2002-211568.
[2] Prahst P S， Kulkarni S， Sohn K H. Experimental Results of the First Two Stages of an Advanced Transonic Core Compressor under Isolated and Multi-Stage Conditions［R］. ASME GT 2015-42727.
[3] Denton J D， Xu L. The Effects of Lean and Sweep on Transonic Fan Performance［R］. ASME GT 2002-30327.
[4] Suder K L， Chima R V， Strazisar A J， et al. The Effect of Adding Roughness and Thickness to a Transonic Axial Compressor Rotor［J］. Journal of Turbomachinery， 1995， 117（4）： 491-505.
[5] Roberts W B， Armin A， Kassaseya G， et al. The Effect of Variable Chord Length on Transonic Axial Rotor Performance［J］. Journal of Turbomachinery， 2002， 124（3）： 351-357.
[6] Garzon V E， Darmofal D L. Impact of Geometric Variability on Axial Compressor Performance［J］. Journal of Turbomachinery， 2003， 125（4）： 692-703.
[7] Lange A， Voigt M， Vogeler K， et al. Impact of Manufacturing Variability on Multistage High-Pressure Compressor Performance［J］. Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power， 2012， 134（11）.
[8] 蔡宇桐，高丽敏，马驰，等. 基于NIPC的压气机叶片加工误差不确定性分析［J］. 工程热物理学报， 2017， 38（3）： 490-497.
[9] 高丽敏，蔡宇桐，徐浩亮，等. 压气机叶片加工误差影响不确定分析［J］. 航空动力学报， 2017， 32（9）： 2253-2259.
[10] 高丽敏，蔡宇桐，曾瑞慧，等. 叶片加工误差对压气机叶栅气动性能的影响［J］. 推进技术， 2017， 38（3）： 525-531.
[11] 高丽敏，蔡宇桐，郝燕平，等. 加工误差对压气机叶片气动性能影响试验研究［J］. 推进技术， 2017， 38（8）： 1761-1766.
[12] 郑似玉，滕金芳，羌晓青. 轮廓度加工超差对压气机气动性能影响的数值研究［J］. 科学技术与工程， 2016， 16（29）： 317-320.
[13] 郑似玉，滕金芳，羌晓青. 压气机叶片扭转度加工超差分析与研究［J］. 节能技术， 2017， 35（2）： 99-102.
[14] 郑似玉，滕金芳，羌晓青. 叶片加工超差对高压压气机性能影响和敏感性分析［J］. 机械工程学报， 2018， 54（2）： 216-224.
[15] 曹传军，李斌，翟志龙，等. 轮廓度与扭转角偏差对压气机气动性能的影响［J］. 科学技术与工程， 2019， 19（11）： 292-298.
[16] 郑覃，羌晓青，滕金芳. 超音速叶型关键几何参数敏感性分析［J］. 节能技术， 2014，（6）： 483-486.
[17] 陈为雄，王掩刚，马峰，等. 超声速来流基元叶型前缘加工误差气动敏感性分析［J］. 推进技术， 2019， 40（10）： 2235-2242.
[18] 程超，吴宝海，郑海，等. 叶片加工误差对压气机性能的影响［J］. 航空学报， 2020， 41（2）.
[19] 刘业胜，曹讳，郭福水，等. 钛合金空心风扇叶片加工误差对其性能影响的初步分析［J］. 航空制造技术， 2013， 59（16）： 58-64.

转子叶片加工误差对1.5级跨声速压气机气动性能的影响

Effects of Rotor Blade Manufacturing Variability on 1.5 Stage Transonic Compressor Aerodynamic Performance

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 0

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价