推进技术 ›› 1998, Vol. 19 ›› Issue (1): 51-57.

• • 上一篇    下一篇

涡喷发动机压气机三种 S2 流面计算程序的比较

袁宁,张振家,顾中华,冯国泰   

  1. 航天工业总公司31所;航天工业总公司31所;哈尔滨工业大学动力系;哈尔滨工业大学动力系
  • 发布日期:2021-08-15

A COMPARISON OF THREE KINDS OF CALCULATION PROGRAM OF S 2 STREAM SURFACE IN THE COMPRESSOR OF AERO ENGINE

  1. The 31st Research Inst.,Beijing,100074;The 31st Research Inst.,Beijing,100074;Dept.of Power Engineering,Harbin Inst.of Technology,Harbin,150001;Dept.of Power Engineering,Harbin Inst.of Technology,Harbin,150001
  • Published:2021-08-15

摘要: 在目前压气机S2流面准三元的工程设计中,广泛采用流函数法、流线曲率和欧拉法三种计算方法。从方程体系、计算方法上进行了比较,同时对某三级轴流压气机进行了校核,并对三种方法的计算结果进行了比较分析,给出了六条相应的结论。但到目前为止,仍没有足够的实验数据表明哪一种方法更好。建议在设计过程中应抓住问题的主要矛盾,灵活运用三种方法分析问题。

关键词: 涡轮喷气发动机;轴流式压缩机;气动特性;数值计算

Abstract: In the design of the quasi three dimensional of S 2 stream surface in compressors,three calculation methods namely the flow function method,the streamline curvature solution method and the Euler method have been adopted widely.In terms of the system of equation and the method of calculation,these methods were compared with each other and with the result of a three stage axial flow compressor.At last,six related conclusions were drawn.At pressent,there are not enough data to show which method is better.It was suggested that these methods should be used properly in terms of the basic contradiction in design.

Key words: Turbojet engine;Axial flow compressor;Aerodynamic characteristic;Numerical calculation