两股湍流射流撞击雾化过程的数值研究 *

推进技术 ›› 2014, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (12): 1669-1678.

两股湍流射流撞击雾化过程的数值研究 *

刘昌波¹,雷凡培²,周立新¹

西安航天动力研究所，陕西西安 710100,中国航天科技集团公司，北京 100037,西安航天动力研究所，陕西西安 710100

发布日期:2021-08-15
作者简介:刘昌波(1979—)，男，博士生，研究领域为液体火箭发动机设计。
基金资助:
国家重大基础研究项目(613193)。

Primary Atomization Simulations of Two Turbulent Impinging Jets

Xi’an Aerospace Propulsion Institute，Xi’an 710100，China,China Aerospace Science and Technology Corporation，Beijing 100037，China and Xi’an Aerospace Propulsion Institute，Xi’an 710100，China

Published:2021-08-15

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 采用新提出的雾化过程仿真算法，对两股湍流射流撞击雾化过程进行了数值研究，重点关注了撞击角和动量比的影响。为精细地模拟湍流对雾化的影响，采用了大涡模拟。对雾场瞬态和统计结果的分析表明，喷雾角随着两股射流撞击角的减小而减小，但液膜的破碎长度反而增加；动量比主要影响雾场的偏斜程度，动量比由1.0增大到2.25时，喷雾偏斜角由[0°]增大到约[23°]。仿真结果与试验结果吻合较好，表明新算法能够较好地反映两股湍流射流的雾化过程。

关键词: 撞击；雾化；大涡模拟；撞击角；动量比

Abstract: Primary atomization simulations of the impinging injectors are carried out by a newly proposed method. The impinging injectors with various structures and operating parameters are investigated，emphasizing on the impact of the impingement angles and the momentum ratios between the two turbulent jets. A large eddy simulation model is involved to describe the details of the turbulent flow. The results of the instantaneous and time-averaged properties show that the spray angle decreases and the breakup length of the liquid sheet increases with the decrease of impingement angles. The results also show that the momentum ratio of the two jets mainly affects the direction of resulting spray. When the momentum ratio increases from 1.0 to 2.25，the incline angle of the spray increases from [0°] to [23°]. The good agreement with experimental results indicates that the new method can be used to simulate the impinging process of two turbulent jets properly.

Key words: Impinging；Atomization；Large eddy simulation；Impingement angle；Momentum ratio

刘昌波,雷凡培,周立新. 两股湍流射流撞击雾化过程的数值研究 *[J]. 推进技术, 2014, 35(12): 1669-1678.

LIU Chang-bo¹,LEI Fan-pei²,ZHOU Li-xin¹. Primary Atomization Simulations of Two Turbulent Impinging Jets[J]. Journal of Propulsion Technology, 2014, 35(12): 1669-1678.

参考文献

[1] Heidmann M F, Priem R J, Humphrey J C. A Study of Sprays Formed by Two Impinging Jets[R]. NACA TN 3835, 1957.
[2] Dombrowski N, Hooper P C. A Study of the Sprays Formed by Impinging Jets in Laminar and Turbulent Flow[J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 1964, 18(3):392-400.
[3] James M D, Kubal T D, Son S F, et al. Calibration of an Impinging Jet Injector Suitable for Liquid and Gelled Hypergolic Propellants[R]. AIAA 2009-4882.
[4] Jung, K, Khil T, Yoon Y. Effects of Orifice Internal Flow on Breakup Characteristics of Like-Doublet Injectors[J]. Journal of Propulsion and Power, 2006, 22(3):653-660.
[5] Jung K, Yoon Y, Hwang S S. Spray Characteristics of Impinging Jet Injectors Using Imaging Techniques[R]. AIAA 2000-3396.
[6] Jung K, Khil T, Yoon Y, et al. The Breakup Characteristics of Liquid Sheets Formed by Like-Doublet Injectors[R]. AIAA 2002-4177.
[7] 张蒙正, 张泽平, 李鳌, 等. 两股互击式喷嘴雾化性能实验研究[J]. 推进技术, 2000, 21(1):57-59. (ZHANG Meng-zhen, ZHANG Ze-ping, LI Ao, et al. Experimental Research on Spray Properties of Unlike Impinging Injectors[J]. Journal of Propulsion Technology, 2000, 21(1):57-59.)
[8] 刘晓伟, 胡伟, 曹晶, 等. 鲁泊数和孔径比对直流互击式喷注器性能的影响[J]. 火箭推进, 2010, 36(3):24-27.
[9] Dickerson R A. Like and Unlike Impinging Injection Element Droplet Sizes[J]. Journal of Spacecraft and Rocket, 1969, 6(11):1306-1308.
[10] Chen X D, Ma D J, Yang V. Mechanism Study of Impact Wave in Impinging Jets Atomization[R]. AIAA 2012-1089.
[11] Ma D J, Chen X D, Khare P, et al. Atomization Patterns and Breakup Characteristics of Liquid Sheets Formed by Two Impinging Jets[R]. AIAA 2011-97.
[12] Grosshans H, Szász R Z, Fuchs L. Full Spray Simulation-Coupled Volume of Fluid and Lagrangian Particle Tracking methods[C]. Estoril, Portugal: 24th European Conference on Liquid Atomization and Spray Systems, 2011.
[13] Tomar G, Fuster D, Zaleski S, et al. Multiscale Simulations of Primary Atomization[J]. Computers & Fluids, 2010, 36(10):1864-1874.
[14] Kim D, Herrman M, Moin P. The Breakup of a Round Liquid Jet by a Coaxial Flow of Gas Using the Refined Level Set Grid Method[C]. Tampa Bay: 59th Annual Meeting of the APS divisions of Fluid Dynamics, 2006.
[15] Herrmann M. A Parallel Eulerian Interface Tracking/Lagrangian Point Particle Multi-Scale Coupling Procedure[J]. Journal of Computational Physics, 2010, 229(3):745-759.
[16] Li X Y, Arienti M, Soteriou M C. Towards an Efficient, High-Fidelity Methodology for Liquid Jet Atomization Computations[R]. AIAA 2010-210.
[17] Li X Y, Soteriou M C. Prediction of High Density-Ratio Liquid Jet Atomization in Crossflow Using High Fidelity Simulations on HPC[R]. AIAA 2012-0175.
[18] Weller H G, Tabor G, Jasak H, et al. A Tensorial Approach to Computational Continuum Mechanics Using Object-Orientated Techniques[J]. Computers in Physics, 1998, 12(6):620-630.
[19] Edin B. Investigation of Free-Surface Flow Associated with Drop Impact: Numerical Simulations and Theoretical Modeling[D]. Aus Zenica: Technischen Universit?t Darmstadt zur, 2010.
[20] Brackbill J U, Kothe D B, Zemach C. A Continuum Method for Modeling Surface Tension[J]. Journal of Computational Physics, 1992, 100(2):335-354.
[21] Yoshizawa A, Horiuti K. A Statistically-Derived Subgrid-Scale Kinetic Energy Model for the Large-Eddy Simulation of Turbulent Flows[J]. Journal of the Physical Society of Japan, 1985, 54(8):2834-2839.
[22] Villiers E D, Gosman A D, Weller H G. Large Eddy Simulation of Primary Diesel Spray Atomization[R]. SAE International, 2004-01-0100.
[23] [C]erne G, Petelin S, Tiselj I. Numerical Errors of the Volume-of-Fluid Interface Tracking Algorithm[J]. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids, 2002, 38(4):329-350.
[24] Arlov D, Revstedt J, Fuchs L. A Different Approach for Handling Large Bubbles in a Square Cross-Sectioned Bubble Column Combining Large Eddy Simulation with Lagrangian Particle Tracking [C]. Leipzig, Germany: 6th International Conference on Multiphase Flow, 2007.
[25] Vallier A, Revstedt J, Nilsson H. Procedure for the Break-up of Cavitation Sheet[C]. Belgrade, Serbia: 4th International Meeting on Cavitation and Dynamic Problems in Hydraulic Machinery and Systems, 2011.
[26] Eggels J, Unger F, Weiss M, et al. Fully Developed Turbulent Pipe Flow: a Comparison Between Direct Numerical Simulation and Experiment[J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 1994, 268(12):175-209.
[27] Rudman M, Blackburn H M. Large Eddy Simulation of Turbulent Pipe Flow[C]. CSIRO, Melbourne: Second International Conference on CFD in the Minerals and Process Industries, 1999.
[28] Villiers E D. The Potential of Large Eddy Simulation for the Modeling of Wall Bounded Flows[D]. London: Imperial College of Science, 2006.
[29] 石少平, 庄逢辰. 射流撞击雾化索太尔平均直径的计算[J]. 推进技术, 1995, 16(3):22-25. (SHI Shao-ping, ZHUANG Feng-chen. Calculation of the Sauter Mean Diameter of Jet-Impinging Atomizers[J]. Journal of Propulsion Technology, 1995, 16(3):22-25.)(编辑:朱立影)　　　　　　　　　　　　　*　收稿日期:2013-10-28；修订日期:2014-01-06。基金项目:国家重大基础研究项目(613193)。作者简介:刘昌波(1979—),男,博士生,研究领域为液体火箭发动机设计。E-mail:5993705@qq.com