垂直起降飞行器升力突降动态过程的数值模拟研究

推进技术 ›› 2015, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (4): 527-531.

垂直起降飞行器升力突降动态过程的数值模拟研究

洪亮¹,额日其太¹,徐惊雷²

北京航空航天大学能源与动力工程学院，北京 100191,北京航空航天大学能源与动力工程学院，北京 100191,南京航空航天大学能源与动力学院，江苏南京 210016

发布日期:2021-08-15
作者简介:洪亮( 1987—)，男，博士生，研究领域为内流气体动力学。

Numerical Simulation of STOVL Aircraft Dynamic Process with Lift Loss

School of Energy and Power Engineer，BeiHang University，Beijing 100191，China,School of Energy and Power Engineer，BeiHang University，Beijing 100191，China and College of Energy and Power Engineering Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics，Nanjing 210016，China

Published:2021-08-15

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 针对短距/垂直起降(STOVL)飞行器动态起飞过程，采用基于雷诺时均方程的标准 k-ε模型数值模拟 STOVL飞行器气动流场，研究 STOVL飞行器吸附力大小，获得了动态过程吸附力随冲击高度变化曲线，发现升力板下壁面主涡结构的存在和运动影响升力板静压沿程分布。在无量纲冲击高度小于 3时，吸附力曲线斜率增大，吸附作用增加，并对比稳态结果，发现动态过程吸附力要大于稳态过程，在无量纲高度为 1.5时，两者相差26%。流场响应迟滞是造成稳态、动态过程结果差异的原因。

关键词: 短距 /垂直起降；冲击射流；动态过程；升力突降；数值模拟

Abstract: For short take off and vertical landing aircraft(STOVL)dynamic taking off process with lift loss， Reynolds-averaged turbulence k-ε model is employed to calculate STOVL aircraft flow field. Curve of dynamicsuckdown is acquired. The lift plate wall pressure is influenced by the formation and movement of the main vor.tex. The slope of suckdown curve increases at dimensionless impinging height lower than three，and suckdown is also augment. Suckdown in dynamic process is greater than steady status，at dimensionless height 1.5，nearly 26% difference. The flow field response delay is the cause of the difference.

Key words: Short take off vertical landing(STOVL)； Impinging jet；Dynamic process；Lift loss；Nu. merical simulation

洪亮,额日其太,徐惊雷. 垂直起降飞行器升力突降动态过程的数值模拟研究[J]. 推进技术, 2015, 36(4): 527-531.

HONG Liang¹,Eriqitai¹,XU Jing-lei². Numerical Simulation of STOVL Aircraft Dynamic Process with Lift Loss[J]. Journal of Propulsion Technology, 2015, 36(4): 527-531.

参考文献

[1] 田宝林 .世界垂直起降动力装置的演进和展望[ J].航空发动机, 2009,23(1): 50-56.
[2] 乔立民,刘学山,杨永波,等 .一种新型垂直起降装置的气动特性分析与数值仿真[ J].飞机设计, 2001, 32(4): 7-12.
[3] Paul M,Bevilaque.Inventing the F-35 Joint Strike Fighter[R].AIAA 2009-1650.
[4] Paul Bevilaqua, Richaed Margason.Jet Entrainment Theory for VTOL Aircraft Suckdown[R].AIAA 2007-1397.
[5] Richard E, Kuhn.The Hot Gas Environment of Jet STOVL Aircraft Hovering in Ground Effect[R].AIAA 93-4888.
[6] Wyatt L A.Static Tests of Ground Effects on Planforms Fitted with a Centrally-Located Round Lifting Jet[R].A R C No.749,1964.
[7] 何枫,谢峻石,郝鹏飞,等 .应用 S-A模型的自由射流和冲击射流数值模拟[ J].推进技术 2001,22(1): 43-47.(HE Feng,XIE Jun-shi,HAO Peng-fei.Computation of Axisymmetric Jet Flow with Spalart-All.maras Turbulence Model[J].Journal of Propusion Tech.nology,2001,22(1): 43-47.)
[8] 徐惊雷,徐忠,肖敏,等 .冲击射流的研究概述[J].力学与实践, 1999,21(6): 8-17.
[9] Frank K Lu,Douglas A Terrier.Performance Analysisof STOVL Aircraft Nozzle in Hover[R].AIAA 2003-184.
[10] KuhnR E,Eshleman J.Ground Effects on VSTOL and STOL Aircraft[R].AIAA 85-4033.
[11] Farm Lane,Horsley E,Zhang X.An Experimental and.Numerical Study of Single Jet Impingement Ground-Ef.fect Lift Loss[R].AIAA 93-4887.
[12] Daniel B,Levin Douglas,Waedwell A.Single Jet-In.duced Effects on Small-Scale Hover Data[J].Journal of Aircraft,1997,34(3): 400-407.
[13] KASHITANI Masashi.Numerical and Experimental In.vestigations of Supersonic Jets From Soot Blower Nozzle[J].JSME International Journal Series B,1998,41(2): 375～380.
[14] Peter Curtis.A Review of the Status of Ground Effect Environment[R].AIAA 2002-5985.
[15] Foley W H.Methodology for Production of V/STOL Pro.pulsion Induced Forces in Ground Effect.[R].AIAA 79-1281.
[16] Krothapalli A,Rajkuperan E.Flow Field and Noise Characteristics of a Supersonic Impinging Jet[J].Fluid Mech.,1999,392(6): 1-29.(编辑:梅瑛)* 收稿日期:2013-12-30；修订日期:2014-03-28。作者简介:洪亮( 1987—),男,博士生,研究领域为内流气体动力学。 E-mail: hongliang365@tom.com