基于流道优化的局部进气高速涡轮机气动噪声控制实验研究

推进技术 ›› 2016, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (2): 266-272.

基于流道优化的局部进气高速涡轮机气动噪声控制实验研究

赵辛午,黄洪雁,马瑞贤,刘占生

哈尔滨工业大学能源科学与工程学院，黑龙江哈尔滨 150001,哈尔滨工业大学能源科学与工程学院，黑龙江哈尔滨 150001,哈尔滨工业大学能源科学与工程学院，黑龙江哈尔滨 150001,哈尔滨工业大学能源科学与工程学院，黑龙江哈尔滨 150001

发布日期:2021-08-15
作者简介:赵辛午，男，博士生，研究领域为叶轮机械。E-mail: xwzhao@hit.edu.cn 通讯作者:黄洪雁，男，教授，博士，研究领域为叶轮机械。
基金资助:
“九七三”计划资助项目(613188020201)。

Experimental Study on Aeroacoustics Control for High-Speed Partial Admission Turbine Based on Flow Path Optimal Design

School of Energy Science and Engineering，Harbin Institute of Technology，Harbin 150001，China,School of Energy Science and Engineering，Harbin Institute of Technology，Harbin 150001，China,School of Energy Science and Engineering，Harbin Institute of Technology，Harbin 150001，China and School of Energy Science and Engineering，Harbin Institute of Technology，Harbin 150001，China

Published:2021-08-15

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 动静叶干涉是涡轮机气动噪声的主要来源之一。针对局部进气高速涡轮机，为了抑制由动静叶干涉引起的单音辐射噪声，提出了增大喷嘴的几何出气角、喷嘴下俯、喷嘴单侧修型和增大动静叶间距的流道优化设计方法以控制涡轮机内的流动状况进而降低噪声辐射，并设计了涡轮机气动噪声测试实验台，测量并分析了优化措施的降噪效果。结果表明，涡轮机流道优化设计方法有效抑制了单音辐射噪声，使各个转子谐频处的离散噪声均得到降低，并在3125Hz处实现了最高达7dB的降噪量；在大部分的三分之一倍频程内，优化设计的涡轮机噪声幅值低于原始设计的涡轮机，最大降噪量为2.1dB。

关键词: 涡轮噪声；局部进气；动静叶干涉；流道优化；单音噪声

Abstract: The rotor-stator interaction is one of the main sources of turbomachine’s aerodynamic noise. For high-speed partial admission turbine，the fluid path optimal design methods including increasing the geometric exit flow angle of nozzle，nozzle pitchdown，sigle-side modification for nozzle，and increasing the distance between rotor and stator were proposed to improve the flow state to control the discrete noise induced by rotor-stator interaction. The test rig for turbine acoustic measurement was designed，and the noise reduction performance was measured and analysed for these optimal design methods. The results show that the distinctive noise is controlled significantly by the adopted optimal design methods，the sound pressure level at every rotating harmonic frequency is decreased，and the maximum reduction is about 7dB at 3125Hz. In most 1/3 octive frequencies，the noise amplitude is lower for optimal turbine，and the maximum decrease is 2.1dB.

Key words: Turbine noise；Partial admission；Rotor-stator interaction；Flow path optimal design；Discrete noise

赵辛午,黄洪雁,马瑞贤,刘占生. 基于流道优化的局部进气高速涡轮机气动噪声控制实验研究[J]. 推进技术, 2016, 37(2): 266-272.

ZHAO Xin-wu,HUANG Hong-yan,MA Rui-xian,LIU Zhan-sheng. Experimental Study on Aeroacoustics Control for High-Speed Partial Admission Turbine Based on Flow Path Optimal Design[J]. Journal of Propulsion Technology, 2016, 37(2): 266-272.

参考文献

[1] Nesbitt E. Towards a Quieter Low Pressure Turbine: Design Characteristics and Prediction Needs[J]. International Journal of Aeroacoustics, 2011, 10(1): 1-16.
[2] Lavin S P, Ho P Y, Chamberlin R. Measurements and Predictions of Energy Efficient Engine Noise[R]. AIAA 84-2284.
[3] Lars Enghardt, Antoine Moreau, Ulf Tapken, et al. Radial Mode Decomposition in the Outlet of a LP Turbine-Estimation of the Relative Importance of Broadband Noise[R]. AIAA 2009-2186.
[4] Tyler J M, Sofrin T G. Axial Flow Compressor Noise Studies[J]. SAE Transactions, 1962, 70:309-332.
[5] Lowson M V. Reduction of Compressor Noise Radiation[J]. Journal of the Acoustical Society of Sound and Vibration, 1967, 6(2): 230-236.
[6] Cooper A J, Peake N. Rotor-Stator Interaction Noise in Swirling Flow: Stator Sweep and Lean Effects[J]. AIAA Journal, 2006, 44(5): 981-991.
[7] Woodward R P, Gazzaniga J A, Bartos L J, et al. Acoustic Benefits of Stator Sweep and Lean for a High Tip Speed Fan[R]. AIAA 2002-1034.
[8] Nallasamy M, Envia E. Computaion of Far-Field Tone Noise Levels for Radial and Swept &Leaned Stators[R]. AIAA 99-1865.
[9] Schulten J B H M. Sound Generated by Rotor Wakes Interacting with a Leaned Vane Stator[J]. AIAA Journal, 1982, 20(10): 1352-1358.
[10] Dominik Broszat, Fritz Kennepohl, Ulf Tapken, et al. Validation of an Acoustically 3-D Designed Turbine Exit Guide Vane[R]. AIAA 2010-3806.
[11] Waitz I A, Brookfield J M, Sell J, et al. Preliminary Assessment of Wake Management Strategies for Reduction of Turbomachinery Fan Noise[J]. Journal of Propulsion and Power, 1996, 12(5): 958-966.
[12] Matthew D Langford, Christopher M Minton, Wing F Ng, et al. Fan Flow Control for Noise Reduction Part 2: Investigation of Wake-Filling Techniques[R]. AIAA 2005-3026.
[13] Steger M, Michel U, Ashcroft G, et al. Turbofan Tone Noise Reduction by Flow-Induced Unsteady Blade Forces[J]. Active Flow Control II, 2010, 108: 157-170.
[14] Steger M, Michel U, Ashcroft G, et al. Tone Noise Reduction of a Turbofan Engine by Additional Aerodynamical Blade Forces[R]. AIAA 2010-3982.
[15] 吴亚东. 带尾缘吹气的叶轮机械内部流动和气动噪声问题的研究[D]. 上海:上海交通大学, 2009.
[16] Lowson M V. The Sound Field for Singulanties in Motion[C]. London: Proceeding of the Royal Society in London. Series A, 1965, 286: 559-572.
[17] Lowson M V. Theoretical Analysis of Compressor Noise[J]. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1970, 47(1B): 371-386.
[18] Fukano T, Kodama Y, Sendoo Y. Noise Generated by Low Pressure Axial Flow Fans I:Modelling of the Turbulent Noise[J]. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 1977, 50(1): 63-74.
[19] Fukano T, Kodama Y, Sendoo Y. Noise Generated by Low Pressure Axial Flow Fans II:Effects of Number of Blades, Chord Length and Camber of Blade[J]. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 1977, 50(1): 75-88.
[20] 纪良, 乔渭阳, 王良峰, 等. 普通室内机翼尾缘噪声降噪的实验研究[J]. 推进技术, 2015, 36(5):703-712. (JI Liang, QIAO Wei-yang, WANG Liang-feng, et al. Experimental Investigation of Airfoil Trailing-Edge Noise Reduction in a Normal Indoor Test Bed[J]. Journal of Propulsion Technology, 2015, 36(5): 703-712.)(编辑:朱立影)　　　　　　　　　　　　　*　收稿日期:2015-04-03；修订日期:2015-07-28。基金项目:“九七三”计划资助项目(613188020201)。作者简介:赵辛午,男,博士生,研究领域为叶轮机械。E-mail: xwzhao@hit.edu.cn通讯作者:黄洪雁,男,教授,博士,研究领域为叶轮机械。E-mail: huanghyhit@126.com