喷射方式对煤油超声速燃烧性能影响的数值研究

推进技术 ›› 2016, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (3): 488-495.

喷射方式对煤油超声速燃烧性能影响的数值研究

刘刚¹,朱韶华¹,郭新华²,田亮¹,徐旭¹

北京航空航天大学宇航学院，北京 100191,北京航空航天大学宇航学院，北京 100191,北京动力机械研究所高超声速冲压发动机技术重点实验室，北京 100074,北京航空航天大学宇航学院，北京 100191,北京航空航天大学宇航学院，北京 100191

发布日期:2021-08-15
作者简介:刘刚，男，博士生，研究领域为超燃冲压发动机燃烧流动的试验与仿真。

Numerical Investigation on Effects of Injection Mode on Supersonic Combustion of Kerosene

School of Astronautics，Beihang University，Beijing 100191，China,School of Astronautics，Beihang University，Beijing 100191，China,Science and Technology on Scramjet Laboratory，Beijing Power Machinery Institute，Beijing 100074，China,School of Astronautics，Beihang University，Beijing 100191，China and School of Astronautics，Beihang University，Beijing 100191，China

Published:2021-08-15

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为了优化超燃冲压发动机燃料喷注系统，提高燃烧性能和发动机可靠性，基于串联凹腔燃烧室构型，对不同燃料喷射方式下液态煤油超声速燃烧进行了三维数值研究，着重分析了壁喷与环喷两种燃料喷射方式对燃烧室性能的影响，并与试验测得的壁面静压数据进行了对比。研究结果表明，环喷改善了掺混效果，使燃料在流道中分布均匀，使其燃烧效率比壁喷提高了4.36%；两种喷射方式下沿程总压损失基本相当，在出口处总压损失了约50%；在第二排喷点下游，环喷得到的CO₂分布范围比壁喷大，且更均匀，体现了其促进燃烧的特性；环喷因燃料动压比较壁喷的小，故其燃料穿透深度比壁喷小。综合来看，建议在相同的燃料当量比下，选择壁喷方式，以简化燃料喷注系统，提高发动机的可靠性。

关键词: 喷射方式；串联凹腔燃烧室；总体性能；穿透深度；壁面静压；数值研究

Abstract: In order to optimize fuel injection system in a scramjet engine and improve combustion characteristics and engine reliability，three-dimensional numerical investigation on supersonic combustion of liquid kerosene in different injection modes based on staged-cavities module has been carried out. It is analyzed that wall injection and loop injection have some influence upon the combustor performance. Static pressure predicted by numerical method is compared with experimental data. The results show that loop injection improves mixing characteristics through uniform distribution of fuel in the combustor. Hence，the combustor efficiency of loop injection increased by 4.36% compared with wall injection. The total pressure loss of the two injection modes along the combustor length is almost the same and it loses 50% in the combustor outlet. At the downstream of the second injection ports，range of CO₂ from loop injection is bigger and more uniform than that of wall injection，which indicates that the former can enhance combustion. However，the penetration depth of loop injection is lower than that of wall injection due to small dynamic pressure ratio for the former. In general，it is suggested that wall injection should be chosen to simplify fuel injection system and increase engine reliability at the same fuel equivalence ratio.

Key words: Injection mode；Staged-cavities combustor；Overall performance；Penetration depth；Wall static pressure；Numerical study

刘刚,朱韶华,郭新华,田亮,徐旭. 喷射方式对煤油超声速燃烧性能影响的数值研究[J]. 推进技术, 2016, 37(3): 488-495.

LIU Gang¹,ZHU Shao-hua¹,GUO Xin-hua²,TIAN Liang¹,XU Xu¹. Numerical Investigation on Effects of Injection Mode on Supersonic Combustion of Kerosene[J]. Journal of Propulsion Technology, 2016, 37(3): 488-495.

参考文献

[1] 周建兴, 朴英, 岂兴明, 等. 两种超声速燃烧室内氢气燃烧的三维数值研究[J]. 航空动力学报, 2008, 23(3): 470-475.
[2] 陈方, 陈立红, 张新宇. 壁面凹腔强化H2超声速燃烧的数值模拟[J]. 推进技术, 2006, 27(6): 563-567. (CHEN Fang, CHEN Li-hong, ZHANG Xin-yu. Numerical Study on H2 Supersonic Combustion in Scramjet Combustor with Cavity[J]. Journal of Propulsion Technology, 2006, 27(6):563-567.)
[3] 李卫强, 宋文艳, 罗飞腾. 纯净空气液态煤油超声速燃烧室性能研究[J]. 空军工程大学学报, 2012, 13(5): 10-13.
[4] Owens M, Segal C, Auslender A H. Effects of Mixing Schemes on Kerosene Combustion in a Supersonic AirStream[J]. Journal of Propulsion and Power, 1997, 13 (4): 525-531.
[5] 刘欧子, 蔡元虎, 胡欲立, 等. 超声速气流中煤油燃烧的实验研究[J]. 推进技术, 2005, 26(3):276-279.(LIU Ou-zi, CAI Yuan-hu, HU Yu-li, et al. Experimental Investigation of Kerosene Fuel Combustion in the Supersonic Flow[J]. Journal of Propulsion Technology, 2005, 26(3):276-279.)
[6] Fan X J, Yu G, Li J G, et al. Investigation of Vaporized Kerosene Injection and Combustion in a Supersonic Model Combustor[J]. Journal of Propulsion and Power, 2006, 22(1): 103-110.
[7] Knudsen E, Kolla H, Hawkes E R, et al. LES of a Premixed Jet Flame DNS Using a Strained Flamelet Model[J]. Combustion and Flame, 2013, 160: 2911-2927.
[8] Ingenito A, Bruno C, Cecere D. LES of the HyShot Scramjet Combustor[R]. AIAA 2010-0758.
[9] 郭金鑫, 刘金林, 朱卫兵, 等. 乙烯超燃燃烧室支板/凹腔结构组合的数值研究[J]. 固体火箭技术, 2012, 35(5): 602-607.
[10] 孙英英, 司徒明, 傅维镳. 煤油-空气预混气流超声速燃烧数值研究[J]. 推进技术, 2004, 25(2):101-106. (SUN Ying-ying, SITU Ming, FU Wei-biao. Numerical Study on Supersonic Combustion of Kerosene-Air Premixed Flow[J]. Journal of Propulsion Technology, 2004, 25(2):101-106.)
[11] 梁剑寒, 王正华, 王承尧. 超燃发动机垂直燃料喷射的数值研究[J]. 推进技术, 2000, 21(1): 12-14. (LIANG Jian-han, WANG Zheng-hua, WANG Cheng-yao. Numerical Study on Normal Fuel Injection in Scramjet[J]. Journal of Propulsion Technology, 2000, 21(1): 12-14.)
[12] 孙明波, 耿辉, 梁剑寒, 等. 超声速来流稳焰凹腔上游气体燃料横向喷注的流动混合特征[J]. 推进技术, 2008, 29(3): 306-311. (SUN Ming-bo, GENG Hui, LIANG Jian-han, et al. Mixing Characteristics of Gaseous Fuel Injection Upstream of a Flameholding Cavity in Supersonic Flow[J]. Journal of Propulsion Technology, 2008, 29(3): 306-311.)
[13] Tomioka S, Murakami A, Kudo K, et al. Combustion Tests of a Staged Supersonic Combustor with a Strut[J]. Journal of Propulsion and Power, 2001, 17(2): 293-300.
[14] Menter F R. Two-Equation Eddy-Viscosity Turbulence Models for Engineering Applications[J]. AIAA Journal, 1994, 32(8): 1598-1605.
[15] Liu G, Xu X, Xie Y F. Numerical Investigation on the Supersonic Combustion of Liquid Kerosene in a Dual-Staged Strut Based Scramjet Combustor[R]. AIAA 2014-3665.
[16] Thomas R A, Bussing, Murmant E M. Finite-Volume Method for the Calculation of Compressible Chemically Reacting Flows[J]. AIAA Journal, 1988, 26(9): 1070-1078.
[17] Baurle R A, Mathur T, Gruber M R, et al. A Numerical and Experimental Investigation of a Scramjet Combustor for Hypersonic Missile Applications[R]. AIAA 98-3121.
[18] Lin K C, Kennedy P J, Jackson T A. Structures of Water Jets in a Mach 1.94 Supersonic Crossflow[R]. AIAA 2004-0971.(编辑:张荣莉)　　　　　　　　　　　　　*　收稿日期:2014-11-15；修订日期:2015-01-19。作者简介:刘刚,男,博士生,研究领域为超燃冲压发动机燃烧流动的试验与仿真。E-mail: liugangence@sina.com