自旋动力恢复过程涡轴发动机快速响应控制律对比研究

推进技术 ›› 2016, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (4): 749-757.

自旋动力恢复过程涡轴发动机快速响应控制律对比研究

华伟^1,2,邓宇³,张海波¹,黄金泉¹

南京航空航天大学能源与动力学院江苏省航空动力系统重点实验室，江苏南京 210016; 中国航空工业集团公司航空动力控制系统研究所，江苏无锡 214063,中国南方航空工业集团有限公司，湖南株洲 412002,南京航空航天大学能源与动力学院江苏省航空动力系统重点实验室，江苏南京 210016,南京航空航天大学能源与动力学院江苏省航空动力系统重点实验室，江苏南京 210016

发布日期:2021-08-15
作者简介:华伟，男，博士生，研究领域为航空发动机建模与控制。
基金资助:
航空科学基金(20142152022)。

A Comparison Study of Turbo-Shaft Engine Fast Response Control Schemes in Power Recovery Process During Helicopter Autorotation

Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics，Jiangsu Province Key Laboratory of Aerospace Power System，Nanjing 210016，China; China Aviation Industry Corp Aviation Power Control System Research Institute，Wuxi 214063，China,China Southern Aviation Industry Group Co.，Ltd.，Zhuzhou 412002，China,Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics，Jiangsu Province Key Laboratory of Aerospace Power System，Nanjing 210016，China and Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics，Jiangsu Province Key Laboratory of Aerospace Power System，Nanjing 210016，China

Published:2021-08-15

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 针对直升机自旋过程中对动力快速安全恢复的问题，充分利用涡轴发动机气路中的导叶、涡轮放气控制，提出了两种涡轴发动机多回路多变量鲁棒控制规律，以实现自旋训练过程中发动机扭矩的快速响应，同时降低旋翼转子瞬态下垂量。采用保性能H2/H∞鲁棒控制算法，分别设计了基于燃油流量&压气机导叶调节，以及燃油流量&涡轮放气调节的具有快速响应能力的发动机转子转速控制规律，使得涡轴发动机在直升机自旋动力恢复过程中，在保证气动稳定安全的前提下，输出扭矩能够快速响应，且旋翼转子下垂量由常规燃油控制的5%下降至3%以内，并能够显著改善燃油动态特性。最后，通过数字仿真对两种控制方法进行了对比分析，得出了在工程应用中两者可能存在的优缺点。

关键词: 自旋动力恢复；涡轴发动机；快速响应；多变量控制

Abstract: For getting a safer and faster power recovery in helicopter autorotation，two new control schemes for turbo-shaft engines are proposed herein to realize engine output torque fast response and therefor lower rotor speed droop，fully taking advantage of compressor guided vanes or turbine bleeding. On the basis of H2/H∞ performance guaranteed design algorithm，two novel fast response control schemes for turbo-shaft engines are devised，which are fuel flow cooperating with compressor guided vanes control，and fuel flow combined with turbine bleeding control，respectively. These two methods can make the output torque response faster under a safe stall margin and limit the free turbine speed droop less than 3% during power recovery process in helicopter autorotation，otherwise the droop value about 5% when employing the traditional fuel flow control. Moreover，the fuel flow transient using the new methods is smoother than that when using the traditional one. At last，simulation results give comparisons between these two control methods，and the merits as well as its defections are also discussed.

Key words: Autorotation power recovery；Turbo-shaft engine；Fast response；Multi-variable control

华伟,邓宇,张海波,黄金泉. 自旋动力恢复过程涡轴发动机快速响应控制律对比研究[J]. 推进技术, 2016, 37(4): 749-757.

HUA Wei^1,2,DENG Yu³,ZHANG Hai-bo¹,HUANG Jin-quan¹. A Comparison Study of Turbo-Shaft Engine Fast Response Control Schemes in Power Recovery Process During Helicopter Autorotation[J]. Journal of Propulsion Technology, 2016, 37(4): 749-757.

参考文献

[1] Shanthakumaran P, Harding J, Thompson T, et al. Flight Simulation Model Application for AH-64A Apache Engine Integration[C]. St.Louis: The 49th Annual Forum of the American Helicopter Society, 1993.
[2] 黄开明, 黄金泉, 周文祥, 等. 直升机自转下滑过程发动机的控制规律[J]. 航空动力学报, 2009, 24(11): 2595-2600.
[3] Jaw L C. Method for Rapidly Changing the Power Output of a Turbine Engine[P]. US Patent, 5280702, 1994.
[4] 陈国强. 直升机/发动机实时优化控制规律与硬件平台研究[D]. 南京:南京航空航天大学, 2012.
[5] Kension D F. Transient Gas Turbine Engine Bleed Control[P]. US Patent, 4655034, 1987.
[6] Sweet D H. Automatic Turbine Engine Bleed Valve Control for Enhanced Fuel Management[P]. US Patent, 5313778, 1994.
[7] 周剑波, 时瑞军, 张秋贵, 等. 进口导叶可调的涡轴发动机性能寻优控制模式[J]. 航空动力学报, 2011, 26(10): 2371-2375.
[8] Paramour M G, Jennings P D. Operational Requirements for Helicopter Engine for UK Services[C]. USA:AGARD Conference Proceedings, 1994: 1-1.
[9] Smith B. Zagranski R. Next Generation Control System for Helicopter Engines[C]. USA: 57th Annual Forum of AHS, 2001.
[10] Smith B J. Zagranski R D. Closed Loop Bench Testing of the Next Generation Control System for Helicopter Engines[C]. USA: 58th Annual Forum Proceedings of AHS, 2002.
[11] 张海波, 孙立国, 孙健国. 直升机/涡轴发动机综合系统鲁棒抗扰控制设计[J]. 航空学报, 2010, 31(5):883-892.
[12] 俞立. 线性矩阵不等式处理方法[M]. 北京:清华大学出版社, 2002: 104-107.
[13] 张海波, 姚文荣, 陈国强. 涡轴发动机/直升机综合控制仿真平台设计 [J]. 推进技术, 2011, 32(3): 383-390. (ZHANG Hai-bo, YAO Wen-rong, CHEN Guo-qiang. Design of a Numeric Simulation Platform for Integrated Turbo-Shaft Engine/Helicopter Control System[J]. Journal of Propulsion Technology, 2011, 32(3): 383-390.)
[14] Konstantinos Dalamagkidis, Kimon P Valavanis, Les A Piegl. Nonlinear Model Predictive Control with Neural Network Optimization for Autonomous Autorotation of Small Unmanned Helicopter[J]. IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology, 2011, 19(4) 2011: 818, 831.
[15] Padfield G D. Helicopter Flight Dynamics-the Theory and Application of Flying Qualities and Simulation Modelling[M]. USA: Blackwell Science Ltd, 1996.　　　　　　　　　　　　　*　收稿日期:2014-11-13；修订日期:2015-01-12。基金项目:航空科学基金(20142152022)。作者简介:华伟,男,博士生,研究领域为航空发动机建模与控制。E-mail: Hua_Wei_Nuaa@163.com(编辑:史亚红)