启动过程对大膨胀比喷管外压失稳的影响研究

推进技术 ›› 2016, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (6): 1182-1188.

启动过程对大膨胀比喷管外压失稳的影响研究

杨建文,刘计武,石晓波,周立新,杨宝庆

西安航天动力研究所液体火箭发动机技术重点实验室，陕西西安 710100,西安航天动力研究所液体火箭发动机技术重点实验室，陕西西安 710100,西安航天动力研究所液体火箭发动机技术重点实验室，陕西西安 710100,西安航天动力研究所液体火箭发动机技术重点实验室，陕西西安 710100,西安航天动力研究所液体火箭发动机技术重点实验室，陕西西安 710100

发布日期:2021-08-15
作者简介:杨建文，男，硕士，工程师，研究领域为液体火箭发动机技术。

Effects of Engine Starting Transient on Buckling under External Pressure for a Large Expansion Ratio Nozzle

Key Laboratory of Science and Technology on Liquid Rocket Engine，Xi’an Aerospace Propulsion Institute， Xi’an 710100，China,Key Laboratory of Science and Technology on Liquid Rocket Engine，Xi’an Aerospace Propulsion Institute， Xi’an 710100，China,Key Laboratory of Science and Technology on Liquid Rocket Engine，Xi’an Aerospace Propulsion Institute， Xi’an 710100，China,Key Laboratory of Science and Technology on Liquid Rocket Engine，Xi’an Aerospace Propulsion Institute， Xi’an 710100，China and Key Laboratory of Science and Technology on Liquid Rocket Engine，Xi’an Aerospace Propulsion Institute， Xi’an 710100，China

Published:2021-08-15

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 针对上面级发动机大膨胀比喷管高模试车时发生的外压失稳现象，进行了高模试车时的稳定工作和启动过程数值仿真和实验研究。结果表明:对于室压4.5MPa，环境压力87kPa，喷管面积比70的上面级发动机，稳定工作时，喷管承受的是内压载荷，不会发生外压失稳；不预抽真空启动时，喷管内的流场建立过程所需的时间很短约0.4s，而试验舱的压力只能依靠发动机的引射而降低，从0.4s开始喷管承受较大的外压载荷，直至10s左右试验舱的压力低于喷管内壁压力，在较长时间内喷管一直承受外压载荷，很容易发生外压失稳；预抽真空启动时喷管在0.14s到0.42s时间段承受外压载荷，且只在0.14s到0.25s内承受的外压载荷较大，喷管承受外压载荷的时间很短，不会发生外压失稳；启动前抽真空是避免喷管发生外压失稳的一种有效手段。

关键词: 大膨胀比喷管；高空模拟试车台；启动过程；外压失稳

Abstract: To address the buckling phenomena under external pressure for a large expansion ratio nozzle during its high altitude ground test，the steady-state and starting transient flow field of the nozzle has been investigated both numerically and experimentally. The results show that for the upper stage engine with nozzle area ratio 70，chamber pressure 4.5MPa and the ambient pressure of 87kPa，the nozzle bulking will not happen during the steady-state in that the nozzle is subject to internal pressure load. However，the nozzle buckling due to the external pressure is liable to occur during the starting transient especially when the vacuum-pumping was not conducted. This is because the flow-field within the nozzle was established within a very short time of about 0.4s，and the pressure in the test chamber was lower than that at nozzle inner wall until 10s. Thus external pressure was loaded on the nozzle wall during this period. Finally，as the engine was started with vacuum-pumping，the external pressure was dominant between 0.14s and 0.42s，which was at a high level before 0.25s，and this period was very short，so the nozzle buckling will not happen. Therefore，vacuum-pumping before engine start-up is an effective method for avoiding buckling for a large expansion ratio nozzle.

Key words: Large expansion ratio nozzle；Altitude simulation test facility；Starting process；Buckling under external pressure

杨建文,刘计武,石晓波,周立新,杨宝庆. 启动过程对大膨胀比喷管外压失稳的影响研究[J]. 推进技术, 2016, 37(6): 1182-1188.

YANG Jian-wen,LIU Ji-wu,SHI Xiao-bo,ZHOU Li-xin,YANG Bao-qing. Effects of Engine Starting Transient on Buckling under External Pressure for a Large Expansion Ratio Nozzle[J]. Journal of Propulsion Technology, 2016, 37(6): 1182-1188.

参考文献

[1] Park B H, Lim J H, Yoon W. Fluid Dynamics in Starting and Terminating Transients of Zero-Secondary Flow Ejector[J]. International Journal of Heat & Fluid Flow, 2008, 29(1): 327-339.
[2] Sankaran S, Satyanarayana T N V, Annamalai K, et al. CFD Analysis for Simulated Altitude Testing of Rocket Motors[J]. Canadian Aeronautics & Space Journal, 2002, 48(2): 153-162.
[3] Manikanda Kumaran R, Vivekanand P K, Sundararajan T, et al. Numerical Simulation of Ejector Performance in a High Altitude Test Facility[C]. BITS Ranchi: 34th National Conference on Fluid Mechanics and Fluid Power, 2007.
[4] Manikanda Kumaran R, Sundararajan T, Raja Manohar D. Pressure Variation in Thrust Chamber During High Altitude Simulation[R]. AIAA 2009-798.
[5] 徐万武, 谭建国, 王振国. 高空模拟试车台超声速引射器数值研究[J], 固体火箭技术. 2003, 26 (2): 71-74.
[6] 徐万武, 王振国. 环型超声速空气引射器零二次流流场数值研究[J]. 推进技术, 2003, 24(1): 36-39. (XU Wan-wu, WANG Zhen-guo. Numerical Study on Flow-Fields of the Zero-Second-Flow Annular Supersonic Ejector[J]. Journal of Propulsion Technology, 2003, 24(1): 36-39.)
[7] 陈健, 吴继平, 王振国, 等. 高空模拟试车台主被动引射方案数值研究[J]. 固体火箭技术, 2011, 34(1): 126-130.
[8] 吴继平. 高增压比多喷管超声速引射器设计理论、方法与实验研究[D]. 长沙:国防科技大学, 2007.
[9] 吕辉强. 二维超声速空气引射器理论与实验研究[D]. 长沙:国防科技大学, 2008.
[10] 王宗浩, 邹建军, 黄洁. 两级超声速引射器流动机理研究[J]. 推进技术, 2013, 34(10): 1304-1309. (WANG Zong-hao, ZOU Jian-jun, HUANG Jie. Supersonic to Supersonic Ejection Mechanism of a Two-Stage Ejector[J]. Journal of Propulsion Technology, 2013, 34 (10): 1304-1309.)
[11] 吴继平, 陈健, 王振国. 多喷嘴超声速引射器启动性能试验[J]. 推进技术, 2008, 29 (2): 175-178. (WU Ji-ping, CHEN Jian, WANG Zhen-guo. Experiment on Starting Performance of Multi-Nozzle Supersonic Ejector[J]. Journal of Propulsion Technology, 2008, 29(2): 175-178.)
[12] Wang J J, Chen F. On the Start Condition of a Second-Throat Ejector-Diffuser[J]. Aeronautical Journal, 1996, 100(998): 321-326.
[13] 许灵芝, 徐旭. 零二次流引射器启动性能数值研究[J]. 推进技术, 2010, 31 (2): 204-209. (XU Ling-zhi, XU Xu. Numerical Investigation on Starting Performance of Zero-Secondary Flow Ejectors[J]. Journal of Propulsion Technology, 2010, 31 (2): 204-209.)
[14] 杨建文, 付秀文, 刘占一, 等. 等截面引射器启动性能数值研究[J]. 应用力学学报, 2014, 31(5): 697-702.
[15] 陈健, 吴继平, 吕辉强, 等. 二维超声速空气引射器启动特性试验研究[J]. 国防科技大学学报, 2010, 32 (5): 7-11.(编辑:梅瑛)　　　　　　　　　　　　　*　收稿日期:2015-02-28；修订日期:2015-04-24。作者简介:杨建文,男,硕士,工程师,研究领域为液体火箭发动机技术。E-mail: guhuochina@126.com