主/引定时对船用天然气/柴油双燃料发动机燃烧排放的影响

推进技术 ›› 2016, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (9): 1735-1741.

主/引定时对船用天然气/柴油双燃料发动机燃烧排放的影响

于洪亮^1,2,段树林¹,孙培廷¹

大连海事大学轮机工程学院，辽宁大连 116026; 大连海洋大学航海与船舶工程学院，辽宁大连 116023,大连海事大学轮机工程学院，辽宁大连 116026,大连海事大学轮机工程学院，辽宁大连 116026

发布日期:2021-08-15
作者简介:于洪亮，男，博士生，讲师，研究领域为发动机燃烧与排放，船舶代用燃料。

Effects of Main/Pilot Timings on Combustion and Emission Characteristics of Marine Dual Fuel Engines

Marine Engineering College，Dalian Maritime University，Dalian 116026，China; Navigation and Naval Architecture College，Dalian Ocean University，Dalian 116023，China,Marine Engineering College，Dalian Maritime University，Dalian 116026，China and Marine Engineering College，Dalian Maritime University，Dalian 116026，China

Published:2021-08-15

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为进一步掌握主燃料天然气的喷射定时(主定时)以及引燃柴油的喷射定时(引定时)对缸内直喷船用双燃料发动机燃烧排放特性的影响规律，按推进特性在25%，50%，75%，100%负荷下进行了纯燃油模式试验，获得了发动机运行及排放数据，并通过有限容积法耦合半隐式法分别就不同主/引定时对发动机燃烧过程、缸内湍流强度以及排放产物的影响进行了数值模拟。结果显示，试验测量的压力及排放数据与对应的数值模拟结果较为一致。主定时比引定时对船用双燃料发动机燃烧排放影响程度更大。主/引定时提前都会引起缸内湍流动能峰值降低，缸内最高爆发压力和最大温度增加。NO排放量随主/引定时每提前2°CA分别上升15.4%和3.5%，而CH4排放量随主定时每提前2°CA降低7.6%，随引定时每提前2°CA升高4.6%。

关键词: 主燃料定时；引燃燃料定时；船用双燃料发动机；燃烧排放

Abstract: In order to obtain performance of marine natural gas/diesel dual fuel engine on natural gas timings (main timings) and pilot diesel timings (pilot timings)，according to propulsion characteristic，the experiment measured original engine operating data and emission data at 25%，50%，75% and 100% load，respectively，on pure fuel model. The finite volume method coupling semi-implicit method had been adopted to numerically analyze effects of different main/pilot timings on combustive process，turbulence intensity in cylinder，and emission of the engine. The results show that numerical simulation results are consistent with the tested pressure and emission data，the main timings makes greater impact than pilot timings on the combustion and emission，main/pilot timings decreases the peak cylinder turbulence kinetic energy，but increases the peak cylinder pressure and the peak temperature. With advancing main/pilot timings every 2° CA，NO emission respectively increases by 15.4% and 3.5%，while CH4 emissions reduces by 7.6% with advancing main timings every 2° CA，and increases by 4.6% with advancing pilot timings every 2° CA.

Key words: Main fuel timings；Pilot fuel timings；Marine dual fuel engine；Combustion and emission

于洪亮,段树林,孙培廷. 主/引定时对船用天然气/柴油双燃料发动机燃烧排放的影响[J]. 推进技术, 2016, 37(9): 1735-1741.

YU Hong-liang^1,2,DUAN Shu-lin¹,SUN Pei-ting¹. Effects of Main/Pilot Timings on Combustion and Emission Characteristics of Marine Dual Fuel Engines[J]. Journal of Propulsion Technology, 2016, 37(9): 1735-1741.

参考文献

[1] 孙培廷. “十二五”期间航运业和造船业热点与难点问题[J]. 世界海运, 2013, 36(1): 1-8.
[2] Selma Brynolf, Erik Fridell, Karin Andersson. Environmental Assessment of Marine Fuels: Liquefied Natural Gas, Liquefied Biogas, Methanol and Bio-Methanol[J].Journal of Cleaner Production, 2014, 74(1): 86-95.
[3] 韩超, 张培, 叶桃红, 等. 甲烷/空气射流抬举火焰的大涡模拟计算[J]. 推进技术, 2014, 35(5): 654-660. (HAN Chao, ZHANG Pei, YE Tao-hong, et al. Large Eddy Simulation of CH4/Air Lifted Flame[J]. Journal of Propulsion Technology, 2014, 35(5): 654-660.)
[4] Debabrata Barik, Murugan S. Simultaneous Reduction of NO_x and Smoke in a Dual Fuel DI Diesel Engine[J]. Energy Conversion and Management, 2014, 84: 217-226.
[5] Yadollahi B, Boroomand M. A Numerical Investigation of Combustion and Mixture Formation in a Compressed Natural Gas DISI Engine with Centrally Mounted Single-Hole Injector[J]. Journal of Fluids Engineering, 2013, 135(9): 1-9.
[6] Gibson C M, Polk A C, Shoemaker N T, et al. Comparison of Propane and Methane Performance and Emissions in a Turbocharged Direct Injection Dual Fuel Engine[J]. Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power, 2011, 133(9): 1-9.
[7] Michailidis A D, Stobart R K, McTaggart-Cowan G P. Low Temperature Combustion Optimization and Cycle-by-Cycle Variability Through Injection Optimization and Gas-to-Liquid Fuel-Blend Ratio[J]. Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power, 2013, 135(7):1-7.
[8] Abagnale C, Cameretti M C, De Simio L, et al. Numerical Simulation and Experimental Test of Dual Fuel Operated Diesel Engines[J]. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2014, 65(1): 403-417.
[9] Mohand Said Lounici, Khaled Loubar, Lyes Tarabet, et al. Towards Improvement of Natural Gas-Diesel Dual Fuel Mode: An Experimental Investigation on Performance and Exhaust Emissions[J]. Energy, 2014, 64(1): 200-211.
[10] Jungsoo Park, Kyo Seung Lee, Min Su Kim, et al. Numerical Analysis of a Dual-Fueled CI (Compression Ignition) Engine Using Latin Hypercube Sampling and Multi-Objective Pareto Optimization[J]. Energy, 2014, 70(1): 278-287.
[11] Jeongwoo Lee, Kookeui Hong, Seungmok Choi, et al. Comparison of the Effects of Multiple Injection Strategy on the Emissions Between Moderate and Heavy EGR Rate Conditions: Part 1-Pilot Injections[J]. Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology, 2013, 27 (4):1135-1141.
[12] Derek A Splitter, Rolf D Reitz. Fuel Reactivity Effects on the Efficiency and Operational Window of Dual-fuel Compression Ignition Engines[J]. Fuel, 2014, 118: 163-175.
[13] Vuorinen V, Wehrfritz A, Duwig C, et al. Large-Eddy Simulation on the Effect of Injection Pressure and Density on Fuel Jet Mixing in Gas Engines[J]. Fuel, 2014, 130: 241-250.
[14] 孙璐, 刘亦夫, 曾科. 不同喷油提前角下双燃料发动机的燃烧特性和稳定特性[J]. 西安交通大学学报, 2014, 48(7): 29-33.
[15] 刘亮欣, 黄佐华, 蒋德明, 等. 不同喷射时刻下缸内直喷天然气发动机的燃烧特性[J]. 内燃机学报, 2005, 23(5): 469-474.
[16] 林学东, 黄丫, 袁方恩. 缸内直喷CNG发动机喷射方式对火焰传播特性及性能的影响[J]. 内燃机学报, 2012, 30(5):440-445.
[17] 徐舟, 曾卓雄, 徐义华. 涡流冷壁旋流燃烧室的数值模拟[J]. 推进技术, 2015, 36(3): 436-442. (XU Zhou, ZENG Zhuo-xiong, XU Yi-hua. Numerical Simulation of a Swirling Combustor with Vortex Cooling Wall[J]. Journal of Propulsion Technology, 2015, 36(3):436-442.)
[18] 郑清平. 压燃式天然气发动机燃烧过程模拟计算和试验研究[D]. 天津:天津大学, 2006.
[19] 甘甜, 王如根, 张杰, 等. 不同湍流模型对插板式进气畸变的数值模拟[J]. 推进技术, 2014, 35(7):891-896. (GAN Tian, WANG Ru-gen, ZHANG Jie, et al. Numerical Simulation of Inlet Distortion with Interceptor with Different Turbulence Models[J]. Journal of Propulsion Technology, 2014, 35(7): 891-896.)
[20] AVL FIRE. AVL FIRE v2008 缸内计算控制参数说明[M]. Austria: AVL LIST, 2008.
[21] Samimi Abianeh O, Chen C P, Mahalingam S. Modeling of Multi-Component Droplet Coalescence in Evaporating and Non-Evaporating Diesel Fuel Sprays[J]. International Journal of Automotive Technology, 2014, 15(7): 1091-1100.
[22] Gy I Zsély, Nagy T, Simmie J M, et al. Reduction of a Detailed Kinetic Model for the Ignition of Methane/Propane Mixtures at Gas Turbine Conditions Using Simulation Error Minimization Methods[J]. Combustion and Flame, 2011, 158(8): 1469-1479.
[23] 解茂昭. 内燃机计算燃烧学[M]. 大连:大连理工大学出版社, 2005.
[24] 刘戈, 解茂昭, 贾明. 利用RIF模型对内燃机燃烧过程的模拟[J]. 内燃机学报, 2011, 29(5): 398-404. (编辑:史亚红)　　　　　　　　　　　　　*　收稿日期:2015-05-04；修订日期:2015-06-04。作者简介:于洪亮,男,博士生,讲师,研究领域为发动机燃烧与排放,船舶代用燃料。E-mail: yuhongliang19852@163.com