定应变贮存条件下HTPB推进剂延伸率老化模型研究

推进技术 ›› 2017, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (1): 207-213.

定应变贮存条件下HTPB推进剂延伸率老化模型研究

周东谟,刘向阳,隋欣,魏志军,王宁飞

北京理工大学宇航学院，北京 100081,北京理工大学宇航学院，北京 100081,北京理工大学宇航学院，北京 100081,北京理工大学宇航学院，北京 100081,北京理工大学宇航学院，北京 100081

发布日期:2021-08-15
作者简介:周东谟，男，博士生，研究领域为复合固体推进剂贮存性能。E-mail: 20101986@bit.edu.cn 通讯作者:刘向阳，男，博士，副研究员，研究领域为航空宇航推进理论与工程。

Elongation Aging Model of HTPB Propellant under Constant Strain

School of Aerospace Engineering，Beijing Institute of Technology，Beijing 100081，China,School of Aerospace Engineering，Beijing Institute of Technology，Beijing 100081，China,School of Aerospace Engineering，Beijing Institute of Technology，Beijing 100081，China,School of Aerospace Engineering，Beijing Institute of Technology，Beijing 100081，China and School of Aerospace Engineering，Beijing Institute of Technology，Beijing 100081，China

Published:2021-08-15

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为研究定应变对HTPB推进剂最大延伸率的影响，开展了3%，6%和9%定应变水平下HTPB推进剂方坯加速老化试验，建立了推进剂最大延伸率的老化模型，并通过试验数据拟合，分析了定应变和温度对各模型参数的影响规律。结果表明:定应变的物理拉伸作用对推进剂的最大延伸率有明显的提升作用，其提升幅值与定应变水平和老化温度呈线性关系。物理拉伸对最大延伸率的提升作用具有明显的力学松弛特性，近似呈指数规律。推进剂在老化过程中存在一介于65℃与70℃之间的临界温度，当老化温度低于临界温度时，定应变对推进剂的延伸率老化速率几乎没有影响；老化温度高于临界温度时会降低延伸率老化速率。

关键词: HTPB推进剂；最大延伸率；加速老化试验；定应变；物理拉伸；老化模型

Abstract: Accelerated aging tests at the conditions of 3%，6% and 9% strain levels were conducted on HTPB propellant with the goal of studying effects of constant strain on its maximum elongation. An elongation aging model was developed to analyze the effects of constant strains and temperature on model parameters by fitting the experimental data. Results show that physical tension effect caused by constant strains can increase elongation significantly，and the increasing amplitude exhibits a linear relationship with aging temperature and pre-strains. Physical tension effect shows obvious characteristics of stress relaxation with aging times at various constant strains，increasing elongation exponentially. There is a critical temperature between 65℃ and 70℃ in the aging process of propellant. Constant strains have almost no effect on elongation aging rate below critical temperature，but they decrease elongation aging rate above critical temperature.

Key words: HTPB propellant； Maximum elongation； Accelerated aging tests； Constant strain； Physical tension； Aging model

周东谟,刘向阳,隋欣,魏志军,王宁飞. 定应变贮存条件下HTPB推进剂延伸率老化模型研究[J]. 推进技术, 2017, 38(1): 207-213.

ZHOU Dong-mo,LIU Xiang-yang,SUI Xin,WEI Zhi-jun,WANG Ning-fei. Elongation Aging Model of HTPB Propellant under Constant Strain[J]. Journal of Propulsion Technology, 2017, 38(1): 207-213.

参考文献

[1] 侯林法. 复合固体推进剂[M]. 北京:宇航出版社,1994.
[2] Abdullah M, Gholamian F, Zarei A R. Investigation of Composite Solid Propellants Based on Nitrated Hydroxyl-Terminated Polybutadiene Binder[J]. Journal of Propulsion and Power, 2014, 30(3): 862-864.
[3] Cerri S, Bohn M A, Menke K, et al. Characterization of ADN/GAP-Based and ADN/Desmophen03-Based Propellant Formulations and Comparison with AP Analogues[J]. Propellants Explosives Pyrotechnics, 2014, 39(2): 192-204.
[4] DeLuca L T, Galfetti L, Maggi F, et al. Characterization of HTPB-Based Solid Fuel Formulations: Performance, Mechanical Properties, and Pollution[J]. Acta Astronautica, 2013, 92(2): 150-162.
[5] Y?ld?r?m H C,?züpek S. Structural Assessment of a Solid Propellant Rocket Motor: Effects of Aging and Damage[J]. Aerospace Science and Technology, 2011, 15(8): 635-641.
[6] 孟红磊, 赵秀超, 鞠玉涛, 等. 基于累积损伤的双基推进剂强度准则及实验[J]. 推进技术, 2011, 32(1): 109-112. (MENG Hong-lei, ZHAO Xiu-chao, JU Yu-tao, et al. Strength Criterion Based on Accumulative Damage for Double-Base Propellant and Experiment [J]. Journal of Propulsion Technology, 2011, 32(1): 109-112.)
[7] Dubois C, Perreault F. Shelf Life Prediction of Propellants Using a Reaction Severity Index[J]. Propellants Explosives Pyrotechnics, 2002, 27(5): 253-261.
[8] 李松年, 刘勇, 王罗新, 等. HTPB推进剂储存老化性能试验研究 [J]. 推进技术, 2006, 27(5): 473-476. (LI Song-nian, LIU Yong, WANG Luo-xin, et al. Test Study on Storage Aging Properties of HTPB Propellants[J]. Journal of Propulsion Technology, 2006, 27(5): 473-476.)
[9] Manjari R, Somasundaran U I, Joseph V C, et al. Structure-Property Relationship of HTPB-Based Propellants(II).Formulation Tailoring for Better Mechanical Properties[J]. Journal of Applied Polymer Science, 1993, 48(2): 279-289.
[10] Cerri S, Bohn M A, Menke K, et al. Ageing Behaviour of HTPB Based Rocket Propellant Formulations[J]. Central European Journal of Energetic Materials, 2009, 6(2): 149-165.
[11] Layton L H, Christiansen A G. Effect of Aging-Strain on Propellant Mechanical Properties [R]. AIAA 79-1245.
[12] 王鸿范, 罗怀德. 定应变对丁羟推进剂老化作用初探 [J]. 固体火箭技术, 1997, 20 (2): 37-42.
[13] 常新龙, 简斌, 刘承武, 等. HTPB推进剂定应变老化性能试验 [J]. 推进技术, 2010, 31(5): 576-580. (CHANG Xin-long, JIAN Bin, LIU Cheng-wu, et al. Experiments on HTPB Propellant Aging Properties under Constant Strain[J]. Journal of Propulsion Technology, 2010, 31(5): 576-580.)
[14] 鲁国林, 罗怀德. 定应变下丁羟推进剂贮存寿命预估 [J]. 推进技术, 2000, 21(1): 79-81. (LU Guo-lin, LUO Huai-de. Storage Life Prediction for HTPB Propellant under Constant Strain[J]. Journal of Propulsion Technology, 2000, 21(1): 79-81.)
[15] Layton L H. Chemical Structural Aging Studies on HTPB Propellant[R]. ADA010731, 1975.
[16] Berry G C, Plazek D J. On the Use of Stretched-Exponential Functions for Both Linear Viscoelastic Creep and Stress Relaxation[J]. Rheologica Acta, 1997, 36(3): 320-329.
[17] Thynell S T, Gongwer P E, Brill T B. Condensed-Phase Kinetics of Cyclotrimethylenetrinitramine by Modeling the T-Jump/Infrared Spectroscopy Experiment[J]. Journal of Propulsion and Power, 1996, 12(5): 933-939.
[18] Andersen P C, Bruno T J. Thermal Decomposition Kinetics of RP-1 Rocket Propellant[J]. Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research, 2005, 44(6): 1670-1676.
[19] 李旭昌, 焦剑, 姚军燕, 等. 丁羟推进剂结构状态与力学性能的相关性研究评述[J]. 空军工程大学学报, 2010, 11(3): 11-15.　　　　　　　　　　　　　*　收稿日期:2015-08-05；修订日期:2015-09-10。作者简介:周东谟,男,博士生,研究领域为复合固体推进剂贮存性能。E-mail: 20101986@bit.edu.cn通讯作者:刘向阳,男,博士,副研究员,研究领域为航空宇航推进理论与工程。E-mail: liuxy@bit.edu.cn(编辑:田佳莹)