一种基于横向压力控制的前体流动特性分析

推进技术 ›› 2017, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (1): 8-15.

一种基于横向压力控制的前体流动特性分析

陈文芳,袁化成 ,华正旭,刘君

南京航空航天大学能源与动力学院，江苏省航空动力系统重点实验室，江苏南京 210016,南京航空航天大学能源与动力学院，江苏省航空动力系统重点实验室，江苏南京 210016,南京航空航天大学能源与动力学院，江苏省航空动力系统重点实验室，江苏南京 210016,南京航空航天大学能源与动力学院，江苏省航空动力系统重点实验室，江苏南京 210016

发布日期:2021-08-15
作者简介:陈文芳，男，硕士生，研究领域为高超声速进气道。
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金(51206077)。

Investigations on Flow Characteristics of Forebody Based on Spanwise Pressure Control

Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics，Jiangsu Province Key Laboratory of Aerospace Power System，Nanjing 210016，China,Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics，Jiangsu Province Key Laboratory of Aerospace Power System，Nanjing 210016，China,Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics，Jiangsu Province Key Laboratory of Aerospace Power System，Nanjing 210016，China and Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics，Jiangsu Province Key Laboratory of Aerospace Power System，Nanjing 210016，China

Published:2021-08-15

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为了探究前体构型对进气道气动特性的影响，在相同的压缩角度及几何长度下，设计了升力体前体和类乘波体前体两种构型方案。就不同构型对前体/进气道气动特性的影响开展了三维数值模拟研究，并与进气道二维流动进行了对比分析。结果显示，相比于进气道二维流动，三维升力体和类乘波体前体构型在设计状态和不同来流攻角下均存在一定的横向压力梯度，导致进气道流量捕获能力降低，与二维流动差异较大，前者流量系数下降20.3%，后者下降9.0%。相比较而言，类乘波体前体在流量捕获能力及升阻比等方面性能更优。增大类乘波体前体宽度比和前缘角度，可以减小前体横向压力梯度，提高前体/进气道的流量捕获能力，前者提高了升阻比，而后者则降低了升阻比。

关键词: 前体构型；攻角；横向压力梯度；流量捕获；升阻比；高超声速；进气道

Abstract: In order to investigate the effects of forebody configurations on inlet aerodynamic performances，two forebody configurations，namely lifting forebody and waverider-like forebody，were designed with the same compression angle and geometry length. 3D numerical simulations were conducted to explore the impact of forebody/inlet with different configurations on aerodynamic performances. Compared with 2D flows，results show that under on-design status and states with different attack angels，both two forebody configurations have spanwise pressure gradients，causing the decrease of inlet mass flow rate and evident differences in comparison with 2D flows，specifically，the former case dropped by 20.3% in mass flow coefficient and the later one declined by 9.0%. The waverider-like body has advantages in terms of mass flow capture and lift-to-drag ratio over lifting body. Increasing parameters of width ratio and leading angle is able to reduce the spanwise pressure of forebody and enhance the capacity of mass flow capture. The former approach improves the lift-to-drag ratio，and the reversed trend is applied to the later one .

Key words: Forebody configuration；Attack angel；Spanwise pressure gradient；Mass flow capture；Lift-to-drag ratio；Hypersonic；Inlet

陈文芳,袁化成,华正旭,刘君. 一种基于横向压力控制的前体流动特性分析[J]. 推进技术, 2017, 38(1): 8-15.

CHEN Wen-fang,YUAN Hua-cheng,HUA Zheng-xu,LIU Jun. Investigations on Flow Characteristics of Forebody Based on Spanwise Pressure Control[J]. Journal of Propulsion Technology, 2017, 38(1): 8-15.

参考文献

[1] 邓英, 朱大明. 空天飞行器及动力技术发展研究[J]. 燃气涡轮试验与研究, 2013, 26(1): 47-52.
[2] 叶友达. 近空间高速飞行器气动特性研究与布局设计优化[J]. 力学进展, 2009, 39(6): 683-694.
[3] David E Reubush, Luat T Nguyen, Vincent L Rausch. Review of X-43A Return to Flight Activities and Current Status[R]. AIAA 2003-7085.
[4] Laurie A Marshall, Catherine Bahm, Griffin P Corpening. Overview with Results and Lessons Learned of the X-43A Mach 10 Flight[R]. AIAA 2005-3336.
[5] Nonweiler T R F. Aerodynamic Problems of Manned Space Vehicles[J]. Journal of the Royal Aeronautical Society, 1959, 63(9): 521-530.
[6] Nonweiler T R F. Delta Wing of Shapes Amenable to Exact Shock Wave Theory[J]. Journal of the Royal Aeronautical Society, 1963, 67(1): 39-48.
[7] Daryl Mayer. X-51A Waverider Achieves Breakthrough in Final Flight[R]. 88th Air Base Wing Public Affairs, 2013-05-03.
[8] 牛文, 李文杰. 美国空军圆满完成X-51A第四次飞行试验[J]. 飞航导弹, 2013(5): 3-4.
[9] 袁化成. 矩形截面高超声速变几何进气道设计方法及气动特性研究[D]. 南京:南京航空航天大学, 2008.
[10] 袁化成, 郭荣伟. 一种前体加宽型高超声速进气道试验方案研究[J]. 航空学报, 2012, 33(4): 617-624.
[11] Paul L Moses, Rausch V L, Nguyen L T, et al. NASA Hypersonic Fight Demonstrators-Overview, Status, and Future Plans[J]. Acta Astronautic, 2004, 55: 619-630.
[12] 黄伟. 高超声速乘波体飞行器机身/发动机一体化关键技术研究[J]. 固体火箭技术, 2009, 32(3): 242-248.
[13] McLaulin T A. Viscous Optimized Hypersonic Waverider for Chemical Equilibrium Flow[D]. Maryland: University of Maryland, 1990.
[14] Anderson J D, Chang J, McLaulin T A. Hypersonic Waverider:Effect of Chemically Reaction Flow and Viscous Interaction[R]. AIAA 92-0302.
[15] 王发民, 李立委, 姚文秀, 等. 乘波飞行器构型方法研究[J]. 力学学报, 2004, 11, 36(5): 513-519.
[16] 贺旭照, 周正, 倪鸿礼. 密切内锥乘波前体进气道一体化设计和性能分析[J]. 推进技术, 2012, 33(4):510-515. (HE Xu-zhao, ZHOU Zheng, NI Hong-li. Integrated Design Methods and Performance Analyses of Osculating Inward Turning Cone Waverider Forebody Inlet[J]. Journal of Propulsion Technology, 2012, 33(4): 510-515.)
[17] 吴颖川, 贺元元, 贺伟, 等. 基于密切曲锥的乘波构型一体化飞行器设计方法研究[J]. 空气动力学学报, 2014, 32(1): 8-13.
[18] 耿永兵, 刘宏, 丁海河, 等. 轴对称近似等熵压缩流场的乘波前体优化设计[J]. 推进技术, 2006, 27(5): 404-409. (GENG Yong-bing, LIU Hong, DING Hai-he. Optimized Design of Waverider Forebody Derived from Asymmetric Near-Isentropic Compression Flow Fields[J]. Journal of Propulsion Technology, 2006, 27(5): 404-409.)
[19] 王建勇, 谢旅荣, 赵昊, 等. 一种改善高超声速进气道自起动能力的流场控制研究[J]. 航空学报, 2015, 36(5): 1401-1410.
[20] 王亚岗, 袁化成, 郭荣伟, 等. 几何尺寸对高超声速进气道气动性能的影响[J]. 航空学报, 2014, 34(7):1893-1901.　　　　　　　　　　　　　*　收稿日期:2015-08-01；修订日期:2015-09-24。基金项目:国家自然科学基金(51206077)。作者简介:陈文芳,男,硕士生,研究领域为高超声速进气道。E-mail: m15151820860@163.com(编辑:朱立影)