大径向落差长度比中介机匣气动特性研究

推进技术 ›› 2017, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (4): 808-814.

大径向落差长度比中介机匣气动特性研究

辛亚楠,李家军,韩阳,赵勇

中国航空工业空气动力研究院，辽宁沈阳 110034,中国航空工业空气动力研究院，辽宁沈阳 110034,中国航空工业空气动力研究院，辽宁沈阳 110034,中国航空工业空气动力研究院，辽宁沈阳 110034

发布日期:2021-08-15
作者简介:辛亚楠，男，工程师，硕士，研究领域为航空发动机叶轮机械气动技术。

Numerical Study on Aerodynamic Characteristics of a Large Radius Change to Length Ratio Intermediate Duct

China Aerodynamics Research Institute of Aeronautics，Shenyang 110034，China,China Aerodynamics Research Institute of Aeronautics，Shenyang 110034，China,China Aerodynamics Research Institute of Aeronautics，Shenyang 110034，China and China Aerodynamics Research Institute of Aeronautics，Shenyang 110034，China

Published:2021-08-15

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为了进一步揭示大径向落差长度比中介机匣的气动特性，采用全三维数值模拟方法对径向落差长度比ΔR/L=0.5的中介机匣的流动与损失特征进行了研究。结果表明大径向落差长度比中介机匣通道内轮毂面存在较大的逆压梯度，支板-轮毂角区容易发生流动分离，加之附面层迁移等复杂流动的影响，导致中介机匣的总压损失较大为3.8%，轮毂25%流量层，主流50%流量层及机匣25%流量层的总压损失分别为2.7%、1.9%和11.7%。进一步的研究发现中介机匣流场对马赫数和支板厚度弦长比的变化较为敏感，特别是轮毂面附近的总压损失会随马赫数和支板厚度弦长比的增大显著增加，马赫数从0.25增大到0.48时，轮毂面总压损失相对增大52%；支板厚度弦长比从0.16增加到0.27时，轮毂面总压损失相对增大93%。

关键词: 数值模拟；大径向落差长度比；流动分离；总压损失；涡量；

Abstract: In order to study the aerodynamic characteristics of an compressor intermediate duct with a large mean radius change to length ratio，three-dimensional numerical simulation investigations of the duct(ΔR/L=0.5)flow and loss are undertaken. The results show that there is a strong adverse pressure gradient at the inner wall，and boundary layer separations happen at the corner of hub and struts，and with the effects of complex flow such as layer separations and layer migrations，the total pressure loss of the duct is 3.8%，while loss in the hub 25% mass flow is 2.7%，the mid 50% mass flow is 1.9%，and the casing 25% mass flow is 11.7%. Further study shows that the duct flow is sensitive to the change of Mach number and the thickness to chord ratio of struts，especially loss in the hub 25% mass flow increases sharply，while Mach number increases from 0.25 to 0.48，loss in the hub 25% mass flow rises by 52%，and while the thickness to chord ratio of struts increases from 0.16 to 0.27，the loss rises by 93%.

Key words: Numerical simulation；Large radius change to length ratio；Flow separation；Total pressure loss；Vorticity

辛亚楠,李家军,韩阳,赵勇. 大径向落差长度比中介机匣气动特性研究[J]. 推进技术, 2017, 38(4): 808-814.

XIN Ya-nan,LI Jia-jun,HAN Yang,ZHAO Yong. Numerical Study on Aerodynamic Characteristics of a Large Radius Change to Length Ratio Intermediate Duct[J]. Journal of Propulsion Technology, 2017, 38(4): 808-814.

参考文献

[1] Ortiz Due?as, Miller R J, Hodson H P, et al. Effect of Length on Compressor Inter-Stage Duct Performance[R]. ASME 2007-GT-27752.
[2] Edward M J Naylor, Cecilia Ortiz Due?as, Robert J. Miller, et al. Optimization of Nonaxisymmetric Endwalls in Compressor S-Shaped Ducts[J]. Journal of Turbomachinery, 2010, 132(1): 1-10.
[3] Sonoda T, Arima T, Oana M. The Effect of Inlet Boundary Layer Thickness on the Flow within an Annular S-Shaped Duct[J]. Journal of Turbomachinery, 1999, 121(7): 626-634.
[4] Bailey D W, Carrotte J F. The Influence of Inlet Swirl on the Flow within an Annular S-Shaped Duct[R]. ASME 96-GT-60.
[5] 向宏辉, 张良, 陆庆飞, 等. 进气条件对压气机中介机匣流场影响的试验研究[J]. 燃气涡轮试验与研究, 2011, 24(4): 15-19.
[6] Britchford K M, Manners A P, Stevens S J, et al. Measurement and Prediction of Flow in Annular S-Shaped Ducts[J]. Experimental Thermal and Fluid Science, 1994, (9): 197-205.
[7] Bailey D W, Britchford K M, Carrotte J F, et al. Performance Assessment of an Annular S-Shaped Duct[J]. Journal of Turbomachinery, 1997, 119(1): 149-156.
[8] Marios K Karakasis, Edward M J Naylor, Robert J Miller, et al. The Effect of an Upstream Compressor on a Non-Axisymmetric S-Duct[R]. ASME 2010-GT-23404.
[9] Walker A D, Barker A G, Carrotte J F. Numerical Design and Experimental Evaluation of an Aggressive S-Shaped Compressor Transition Duct with Bleed[R]. ASME 2011-GT-45628.
[10] Fredrik Wallin, J?rgen Olsson, Peter PJ Johansson, et al. High Speed Testing and Numerical Validation of an Aggressive Intermediate Compressor Duct[R]. ASME 2013-GT-94315.
[11] 高丽敏, 冯旭栋, 陈璇, 等. 关于压气机过渡段设计方法的探讨[J] . 航空学报, 2013, 34(5): 1057-1063.
[12] 阙晓斌, 侯安平, 周盛. 基于壁面压力梯度控制的压气机S形过渡段设计[J]. 航空学报, 2010, 31(3):459-465.
[13] 邓小明, 高丽敏, 冯旭栋, 等. 压气机中介机匣三点NURBS曲线参数化方法[J]. 工程热物理学报, 2014, 35(7): 1330-1333.
[14] 阙晓斌, 侯安平, 周盛. 轴流压缩系统带支板过渡段的轴对称等效方法[J]. 航空学报, 2010, 31(9):1715-1722.
[15] 钟兢军, 康达, 陆华伟, 等. 高负荷扩压叶栅三维定常旋涡结构建模研究[J]. 推进技术, 2015, 36(6):852-863. (ZHONG Jing-jun, KANG Da, LU Hua-wei, et al. Study on Three-Dimensional Steady Vortex Structure in a Highly Loaded Compressor Cascade[J]. Journal of Propulsion Technology, 2015, 36(6): 852-863.)
[16] 王如根, 胡加国, 余超, 等. 跨声速压气机转子的二次流旋涡结构[J]. 推进技术, 2015, 36(4): 504-512. (WANG Ru-gen, HU Jia-guo, YU Chao, et al. Research on Secondary Flow Vortex Structure in Transonic Compressor Rotor[J]. Journal of Propulsion Technology, 2015, 36(4): 504-512. )
[17] 陈焕龙. 采用缝隙射流技术的弯曲扩压叶栅气动性能研究[D]. 哈尔滨:哈尔滨工业大学, 2009.　　　　　　　　　　　　　*　收稿日期:2015-12-21；修订日期:2016-01-19。作者简介:辛亚楠,男,工程师,硕士,研究领域为航空发动机叶轮机械气动技术。E-mail: hitxyn@163.com(编辑:田佳莹)