燃烧风洞不同模拟方式对超燃发动机性能影响试验研究

推进技术 ›› 2017, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (9): 2062-2068.

燃烧风洞不同模拟方式对超燃发动机性能影响试验研究

谭宇^1,2,毛雄兵²,焦伟²,刘伟雄²

西北工业大学航空学院，陕西西安 710072; 中国空气动力研究与发展中心超高速空气动力研究所高超声速冲压发动机技术重点实验室，四川绵阳 621000,中国空气动力研究与发展中心超高速空气动力研究所高超声速冲压发动机技术重点实验室，四川绵阳 621000,中国空气动力研究与发展中心超高速空气动力研究所高超声速冲压发动机技术重点实验室，四川绵阳 621000,中国空气动力研究与发展中心超高速空气动力研究所高超声速冲压发动机技术重点实验室，四川绵阳 621000

发布日期:2021-08-15
作者简介:谭宇，男，博士生，副研究员，研究领域为超声速燃烧。

Experimental Investigation of Effects of Different Simulation Way of Combustion Heating Wind Tunnel on Scramjet Performance

College of Aeronautics，Northwestern Polytechnical University，Xi’an 710072，China; Science and Technology on Scramjet Laboratory of Hypervelocity Aerodynamics Institute，CARDC，Mianyang 621000，China,Science and Technology on Scramjet Laboratory of Hypervelocity Aerodynamics Institute，CARDC，Mianyang 621000，China,Science and Technology on Scramjet Laboratory of Hypervelocity Aerodynamics Institute，CARDC，Mianyang 621000，China and Science and Technology on Scramjet Laboratory of Hypervelocity Aerodynamics Institute，CARDC，Mianyang 621000，China

Published:2021-08-15

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为了研究燃烧加热风洞不同模拟方式对超燃冲压发动机性能的影响，采用相同流道的发动机模型，在模拟“静温+静压”的酒精燃烧加热和模拟“焓值+动压”的氢气加热这两种燃烧加热风洞上，开展了不同模拟方式对超然冲压发动机性能对比试验，结合飞行试验数据和对模拟方式的理论推导与分析，对风洞试验数据进行了详细的对比分析。根据分析可知:采用燃烧风洞进行超然冲压发动机性能研究时，模拟参数应该选取“焓值、动压和发动机油气比”等参数；本研究中在Ma5状态时，酒精燃烧风洞来流的“焓值和动压”与实际参数相差不大(小于3%)，其发动机性能与氢气燃烧加热风洞的发动机性能基本一致；在Ma6状态时，酒精燃烧风洞来流的焓值与实际参数相差了约10%，性能也出现了明显的差异。

关键词: 燃烧加热；超然冲压发动机；试验研究

Abstract: The scramjet model with the same flow channel was used in order to study the influence of the performance of scramjet with different simulation methods of combustion wind tunnel. The experiment was executed in the wind tunnel with two kinds of combustion heating methods，the one which was heated by burning alcohol was used to simulate the method of “static temperature and static pressure”，and the other heated by burning hydrogen was used to simulate the method of “total enthalpy and dynamic pressure”. By combining the flight test data and theoretical deduction and analysis，a detailed comparative analysis of experimental data was carried out . The results show that when the performance of scramjet is studied by using the combustion wind tunnel，“enthalpy，dynamic pressure and equivalent ratio” should be chosen as the simulation parameters. In the state of Ma5，the performance results of scramjet are basically consistent in the two tunnels，because the total enthalpy and the dynamic pressure of the flow in the wind tunnel are similar with the practical parameter (smaller than 3%). But in the state of Ma6，there are significant differences of the performance results of scramjet，because the total enthalpies of practical parameters differs by about 10% from the parameters simulated by the wind tunnel which was heated by burning alcohol.

Key words: Combustion heating；Scramjet engine；Experimental investigation

谭宇,毛雄兵,焦伟,刘伟雄. 燃烧风洞不同模拟方式对超燃发动机性能影响试验研究[J]. 推进技术, 2017, 38(9): 2062-2068.

TAN Yu^1,2,MAO Xiong-bing²,JIAO Wei²,LIU Wei-xiong². Experimental Investigation of Effects of Different Simulation Way of Combustion Heating Wind Tunnel on Scramjet Performance[J]. Journal of Propulsion Technology, 2017, 38(9): 2062-2068.

参考文献

[1] John I Erdos. Ground Testing Abilities, Inabilities and Options for Scramjet Development[R]. AIAA 97-3014.
[2] 西格尔. 超燃冲压发动机的过程和特性[M]. 张新国译. 北京:航空工业出版社, 2012.
[3] Lawrence D Huebner, Kenneth E Rock, David W Witte, et al. Hyper-X Engine Testing in the NASA Langley 8-Foot High Temperature Tunnel[R]. AIAA 2000-3605.
[4] Voland R T, Auslender A H, Smart M K, et al. CIAM/NASA Mach 6.5 Scramjet Flight and Ground Test[R]. AIAA 99-4848.
[5] Pellett G L, Bruno C, Chinitz W. Review of Air Vitiation Effects on Scramjet Ignition and Flameholding Combustion Processes[R]. AIAA 2002-3880.
[6] Guy R W, Rogers R C, Puster R L, et al. The NASA Langley Scramjet Test Complex[R]. AIAA 96-3243.
[7] Boyce R R, Wendt M, Puall A, et al. Supersonic Combustion-a Shock Tunnel and Vitiation-Heated Blowdown Tunnel Comparison[R]. AIAA 98-0941.
[8] Stalker R J, Paull A, Mee D J, et al. Scramjets and Shock Tunnels-the Queensland Experience[J]. Progress in Aerospace Sciences, 2005, 41: 471-513.
[9] McDaniel Jr J C, Krauss R H, Whitehurst W B, et al. Test Gas Vitiation Effects in a Dual-Mode Combustor[R]. AIAA 2003-6960.
[10] 陈亮. 实验气体污染对超音速燃烧性能影响的数值模拟研究[J]. 弹箭与制导学报, 2011, 31(3): 142-145.
[11] 郭帅帆, 宋文艳, 李建平, 等. 乙醇燃烧加热空气污染物对煤油超燃的影响[J]. 航空动力学报, 2011, 26(8): 1921-1927.
[12] 郭帅帆, 宋文艳, 李建平, 等. 燃烧加热污染空气对超然冲压发动机性能的影响研究[J]. 推进技术, 2013, 34(4): 493-498. (GUO Shuai-fan, SONG Wen-yan, LI Jian-ping, et al. Numerical Investigation of Effects of Vitiated Air on Scramjet Performance[J]. Journal of Propulsion Technology, 2013, 34(4): 493-498.)
[13] 邢建文, 李卫强, 肖保国. 不同燃料燃烧加热对超燃冲压发动机性能影响分析与评估[J]. 推进技术, 2013, 34(12): 1636-1642. (XING Jian-wen, LI Wei-qiang, XIAO Bao-guo. Effects of Different Fueled Combustion Heater on Scramjet Performance[J]. Journal of Propulsion Technology, 2013, 34(12): 1636-1642.)
[14] John D Anderson Jr. Hypersonic and High-Temperature Gas Dynamics[M]. 北京:航空工业出版社, 2013.
[15] 曾汉才. 燃烧技术[M]. 武汉:华中理工大学出版社,1990.
[16] William H Heiser, David T Pratt. Hypersonic Airbreathing Propulsion[M]. Washington DC: Published by American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 1994.(编辑:梅瑛)　　　　　　　　　　　　　*　收稿日期:2016-05-24；修订日期:2016-08-23。作者简介:谭宇 ,男,博士生,副研究员,研究领域为超声速燃烧。 E-mail: maomao_yy@sina.com