火箭点火压力脉冲形成机理与影响因子分析

推进技术 ›› 2018, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (1): 152-159.

火箭点火压力脉冲形成机理与影响因子分析

谢建¹,谢政¹,常正阳²,杜文正¹,权辉¹

火箭军工程大学发射工程系，陕西西安 710025,火箭军工程大学发射工程系，陕西西安 710025,火箭军工程设计研究院，北京 100011,火箭军工程大学发射工程系，陕西西安 710025,火箭军工程大学发射工程系，陕西西安 710025

发布日期:2021-08-15
作者简介:谢建，男，博士，教授，研究领域为兵器发射理论与技术。
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金面上项目(51475462)。

Generation Mechanism and Influence Factors Analysis of Rocket Ignition Pressure Pulse

Department of Lsunvh Engineering，Rocket Force University of Engineering，Xi’an 710025，China,Department of Lsunvh Engineering，Rocket Force University of Engineering，Xi’an 710025，China,Rocket Force Engineering Design Institute，Beijing 100011，China,Department of Lsunvh Engineering，Rocket Force University of Engineering，Xi’an 710025，China and Department of Lsunvh Engineering，Rocket Force University of Engineering，Xi’an 710025，China

Published:2021-08-15

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为深入研究火箭点火瞬时压力脉冲形成机理，以火箭在地下有限空间内发射为研究对象，采用一维线性波理论分析了压力脉冲的形成机理和影响因子，并对压力脉冲幅值进行了估算。同时，采用计算流体力学方法，建立了基于三维可压缩气体Navier-Stokes方程的火箭发射燃气流场模型，详细揭示了压力脉冲在地下井内的幅值分布和演化规律。仿真结果表明，发动机燃烧室建压速率越大，井内的压力脉冲峰值越大，峰值出现的时间越早；燃气流密度越大，压力脉冲峰值越小，峰值出现的时间越晚；井筒越深，压力脉冲幅值越大。一维线性波理论分析和计算流体力学方法结果的压力脉冲峰值与试验结果比较，相对误差均不大于14.2%，表明这两种方法均能有效预示火箭点火压力脉冲幅值和分布规律。

关键词: 火箭；点火压力脉冲；燃气流场；一维线性波；数值计算

Abstract: To take more research on rocket motor ignition pressure pulse generation mechanism， the rocket launch in confined underground space was taken as the research object. One-dimensional linear wave analysis method was applied to expose the physical cause and influence factors for the pressure pulse， and the pressure pulse’s magnitude was estimated. Meanwhile， a rocket launch jet flow field’s numerical model based on three-dimensional Navier-Stokes equation for compressible viscid gas was proposed to characterize basic features of the rocket motor exhaust plume discharging in silo. Then， the computational fluid dynamics method was used to solve the numerical model and reveal the details of jet flow field， such as pressure pulse distribution and evolution rule in silo. Simulation results demonstrate that pressure pulse peak is higher and peak time is more advanced with motor chamber pressurization slope increasing. However， pressure pulse peak and peak time present an inverse rule with exhaust plume density increasing. The deeper the silo is， the higher the pressure pulse peak is. Compared with the test result， the relative error of the pressure pulse peak obtained by one-dimensional linear wave analysis method and CFD numerical simulation is no larger than 14.2%， which indicates that both methods are effective to predict rocket motor ignition pressure pulse values and evolution rule.

Key words: Rocket；Ignition pressure pulse；Jet flow field；One dimensional linear wave；Numerical simulation

谢建,谢政,常正阳,杜文正,权辉. 火箭点火压力脉冲形成机理与影响因子分析[J]. 推进技术, 2018, 39(1): 152-159.

XIE Jian¹,XIE Zheng¹,CHANG Zheng-yang²,DU Wen-zheng¹,QUAN Hui¹. Generation Mechanism and Influence Factors Analysis of Rocket Ignition Pressure Pulse[J]. Journal of Propulsion Technology, 2018, 39(1): 152-159.

参考文献

[1] 姜毅, 史少岩, 牛钰森, 等. 发射气体动力学[M]. 北京:北京理工大学出版社, 2015.
[2] Salita M, Glatt L. Modeling of Ignition Overpressure in Minuteman Silos[R]. AIAA 97-2720.
[3] Ikawa H, Laspesa F S. Ignition/Duct Overpressure Induced by Space Shuttle Solid Rocket Motor Ignition[J]. Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets, 1985, 22(4): 481-488.
[4] Walsh E J, Hart P M. Liftoff Ignition Overpressure a Correlation[J]. Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets, 1981, 19(6): 550-556.
[5] Casiano M J, Alvord D A, McDaniels D M. Ares I Scale Model Acoustic Test Overpressure Results[R]. NASA TM-2011-217452, 2011.
[6] Troclet B, Alestra S, Terrasse I, et al. Identification of Overpressure Sources at Launch Vehicle Liftoff Using an Inverse Method[J]. Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets, 2007, 44(3): 597-606.
[7] Viatcheslav O, Michael K, Halyna H. Mitigation of Solid Booster Ignition over Pressure by Water Aerosol Sprays[J]. Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets, 2015, 50(3): 928-942.
[8] Broadwell J E, Tsu C N. Transient Pressure Caused by Rocket Start and Shutdown in Ducted Launchers[J]. Journal of Spacecraft, 1967, 4(10): 1323-1328.
[9] Canabal F, Frendi A. Study of the Ignition Overpressure Suppression Technique by Water Addition[J]. Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets, 2006, 43(4): 853-865.
[10] Canabal F. Suppression of the Ignition Overpressure Generated by Launch Vehicles[D]. Huntsville, AL: University of Alabama, 2004.
[11] Seiji T, Ryoji T. Numerical Analysis of Ignition Overpressure Effect on H-IIB Launch Vehicle[J]. Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets, 2014, 51(3): 893-899.
[12] Troyes J, Vuillot F, Varnier J, et al. Numerical Simulations of Rocket Solid Motor Engine Ignition and Duct Overpressure Waves at Reduced Scale[C]. Denver: 45th AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference & Exhibit, 2009: 4981.
[13] Fukuda K, Tsutsumi S, Fujii K, et al. Acoustic Measurement and Prediction of Solid Rockets in Static Firing Tests[C]. Miami: 15th AIAA/CEAS Aeroacoustics Conference, 2009: 3368.
[14] 徐强, 李军. 燃气射流起始冲击波形成机理的实验研究[J]. 推进技术, 2000, 21(3): 16-18. (XU Qiang, LI Jun. Experimental Study on Mechanism of Initial Shock Wave in Jet Flow[J]. Journal of Propulsion Technology, 2000, 21(3): 16-18.)
[15] 牛钰森, 姜毅, 史少岩, 等. 与燃气射流耦合的易裂后盖开启过程数值分析[J]. 兵工学报, 2015, 36(1): 87-93.
[16] 刘琦, 傅德彬, 姜毅. 贮运发射箱内燃气射流的非定常冲击流场数值模拟[J]. 弹箭与制导学报, 2005, 25(2): 382-384.
[17] 刘朝阳, 王振国, 孙明波, 等. 一种求解激波问题的中心差分-WENO混合方法研究[J]. 推进技术, 2016, 37(8): 1522-1528. (LIU Zhao-yang, WANG Zhen-guo, SUN Ming-bo, et al. Investigation of a Hybrid Central Difference-WENO Method for Shock Wave Problems[J]. Journal of Propulsion Technology, 2016, 37(8): 1522-1528.)(编辑:朱立影)　　　　　　　　　　　　　*　收稿日期:2017-02-15；修订日期:2017-03-30。基金项目:国家自然科学基金面上项目(51475462)。作者简介:谢建,男,博士,教授,研究领域为兵器发射理论与技术。E-mail: xiejian1967@126.com