水雾对火箭射流压力脉动抑制效果的数值研究

推进技术 ›› 2018, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (12): 2718-2727.

水雾对火箭射流压力脉动抑制效果的数值研究

谢建¹,谢政¹,杜文正¹,常正阳²,姚晓光¹

火箭军工程大学发射工程系，陕西西安 710025,火箭军工程大学发射工程系，陕西西安 710025,火箭军工程大学发射工程系，陕西西安 710025,火箭军工程设计研究院，北京 100011,火箭军工程大学发射工程系，陕西西安 710025

发布日期:2021-08-15
作者简介:谢建，男，博士，教授，研究领域为兵器发射理论与技术。E-mail: xiejian1967@126.com 通讯作者:谢政，男，博士生，研究领域为火箭发射燃气气体动力学。
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金面上项目(51475462)。

Numerical Investigation on Pressure Pulsation Suppression of Rocket Jet Flow by Water Mist

Launching Engineering Department ，Rocket Force University of Engineering，Xi’an 710025，China,Launching Engineering Department ，Rocket Force University of Engineering，Xi’an 710025，China,Launching Engineering Department ，Rocket Force University of Engineering，Xi’an 710025，China,The Rocket Force Engineering Design Institute，Beijing 100011，China and Launching Engineering Department ，Rocket Force University of Engineering，Xi’an 710025，China

Published:2021-08-15

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为研究水雾对火箭射流压力脉动的抑制效果，以火箭在地下有限空间内发射为研究对象，采用平面波跨介质传播理论分析了水雾对压力脉动的抑制机理和效果。采用计算流体力学方法，考虑水滴破碎和蒸发作用，详细揭示了射流压力脉动与水雾的作用过程，并研究了水雾参数对压力脉动抑制效果的影响规律。数值结果表明，不同水滴直径的水雾对压力脉动有2种不同的抑制机理，当水雾的水滴直径大于0.7mm时，水雾对压力脉动的抑制效率随水滴直径增大而降低；当水滴直径小于0.7mm时，抑制效率受水滴直径变化的影响可以忽略；临界直径的值是压力脉动时间特性的函数。此外，水雾的浓度越高，水雾对射流压力脉动的抑制效果越好；压力脉动抑制效果与水雾层厚度之间呈类似抛物线关系，当水雾层厚度为0.3m时，传递系数不大于0.43，水雾对射流压力脉动有最优的抑制效果。

关键词: 水雾；火箭；压力脉动；燃气流场；数值计算；抑制

Abstract: In order to research on pressure pulsation suspension of rocket jet flow by water mist， the rocket launch in confined underground space is taken as the research object. The theory of plane waves propagation in different medium is applied to expose the suppression mechanism and performance for the pressure pulsation suppression of rocket jet flow by water mist. And， a rocket launch jet flow field’s numerical model is proposed to characterize basic features of the rocket motor exhaust plume discharging in silo. Water droplets breakup and evaporation are also taken into account in the numerical simulations. Then， the computational fluid dynamics method is used to solve the numerical model and reveal the interaction between pressure pulsation and water mist. Meanwhile， influences of water mist parameters on the suppression effect are studied. Numerical results demonstrate that there are two different interaction mechanisms between water droplet and pressure pulsation which are closely related to droplet diameter. If water droplet diameter is larger than 0.7mm， the suppression efficiencies decrease with droplet diameter increasing. If water droplet diameter is smaller than 0.7mm， influence of droplet diameter variation on suppression efficiencies can be ignored. And， the critical diameter between different mechanism is function of pressure pulsation time characteristic. Furthermore， the mitigation efficiency increases as the water droplets volume fraction increases. In addition， there is parabola relationship between mitigation efficiency and mist layer thickness. The transmission coefficient is not bigger than 0.43 when mist layer thickness is 0.3m. And， the water mist layer provides the best suppression performance.

Key words: Water mist；Rocket；Pressure pulsation；Jet flow field；Numerical computation；Suppression

谢建,谢政,杜文正,常正阳,姚晓光. 水雾对火箭射流压力脉动抑制效果的数值研究[J]. 推进技术, 2018, 39(12): 2718-2727.

XIE Jian¹,XIE Zheng¹,DU Wen-zheng¹,CHANG Zheng-yang²,YAO Xiao-guang¹. Numerical Investigation on Pressure Pulsation Suppression of Rocket Jet Flow by Water Mist[J]. Journal of Propulsion Technology, 2018, 39(12): 2718-2727.

参考文献

[1] Dargaud J B, Troyes J, Lamet J M, et al. Numerical Study of Solid Rocket Motor Ignition Overpressure Wave Including Infrared Radiation[J]. Journal of Propulsion and Power, 2013, 30(1): 164-174.
[2] 王志健, 赵汝岩. 点火发动机点火喷流传播过程分析[J]. 推进技术, 2010 (4): 452-455. (WANG Zhi-jian, ZHAO Ru-yan. Analysis of Jet Propagating Process of Jets Produced by Ignition Motor[J]. Journal of Propulsion Technology, 2010 (4): 452-455.)
[3] Troyes J, Vuillot F. Numerical Simulations of Model Solid Rocket Motor Ignition Overpressure Waves[C]. Hartford: 44th AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference & Exhibit, 2008.
[4] 黄怀德. 振动工程[M]. 北京:宇航出版社, 1993.
[5] Salita M, Glatt L, Norton C, et al. Modeling of Ignition Overpressure in Minuteman Silos[C]. Alabama: 33rd Joint Propulsion Conference and Exhibit, 1997.
[6] Kwak D, Kris C. Computation of Unsteady Flow in Flame Trench for Prediction of Ignition Overpressure Waves[R]. NASA-ARC-E-DAA-TN2199, 2010.
[7] Viatcheslav O, Michael K, Halyna H. Mitigation of Solid Booster Ignition Over Pressure by Water Aerosol Sprays[J]. Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets, 2015, 50(3): 928-942.
[8] Canabal F, Frendi A. Study of the Ignition Overpressure Suppression Technique by Water Addition[J]. Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets, 2006, 43(4): 853-865.
[9] Canabal F, Frendi A. Suppression of the Ignition Overpressure Generated by Launch Vehicles[C]. Manchester: 10th AIAA/CEAS Aeroacoustics Conference, 2004.
[10] 高旭亮. 超细水雾抑制甲烷爆炸实验与数值模拟[D]. 大连:大连理工大学, 2014.
[11] Counter D D. Ignition Overpressure Study from Solid Rocket Motor Firings[R]. NASA-TM-86587, 1987.
[12] 周帆, 姜毅, 郝继光. 火箭发动机尾焰流场注水降温效果初探[J]. 推进技术, 2012, 33(2): 249-252.(ZHOU Fan, JIANG Yi, HAO Ji-guang. Exploring on Cooling Effect of Water Injection on Rocket Motor Exhaust[J]. Journal of Propulsion Technology, 2012, 33(2): 249-252.)
[13] 李仁凤, 乐贵高, 马大为, 等. 进气角与注水规律对燃气-蒸汽弹射的影响[J]. 航空动力学报, 2017, (4): 961-969.
[14] Rodrigues C, Barata J, Silva A. Modeling of Evaporating Sprays Impinging onto Solid Surfaces[J]. Journal of Thermo Physics and Heat Transfer, 2017: 109-119.
[15] ANSYS Fluent Theory Guide (Release,16.0)[M]. Canonsburg: ANSYS Inc., 2016.
[16] Brekhovskikh L. Waves in Layered Media[M]. Holland: Elsevier, 2012.
[17] 邓寒玉, 封锋, 武晓松, 等. 基于扩展 TAB 模型的凝胶液滴二次雾化特性研究[J]. 推进技术, 2015, 36(11): 1734-1740. (DENG Han-yu, FENG Feng, WU Xiao-song, et al. Characteristics of Second Atomization for Gelled Droplet Based on Extended TAB Model[J]. Journal of Propulsion Technology, 2015, 36(11): 1734-1740.)
[18] Miller R S, Harstad K, Bellan J. Evaluation of Equilibrium and Non-equilibrium Evaporation Models for Many Droplet Gas-Liquid Flow Simulations[J]. International Journal of Multiphase Flow, 1998, 24(6): 1025-1055.
[19] Ranz W E, Marshall W R. Evaporation from Drops[J]. Chemical Engineering Progress, 1952, 48(3): 141-146.
[20] 陶文铨. 数值传热学[M]. 西安:西安交通大学出版社, 1998.
[21] 乔野, 聂万胜, 丰松江, 等. 多喷管液体火箭动力系统尾焰流场特性研究[J]. 推进技术, 2017, 38(2): 356-363. (QIAO Ye, NIE Wan-sheng, FENG Song-jiang, et al. Research on Plume Flow-Field Characteristics of Multi-Nozzle Rocket Propulsion System[J]. Journal of Propulsion Technology, 2017, 38(2): 356-363.)
[22] Jourdan G, Biamino L, Mariani C, et al. Attenuation of a Shock Wave Passing Through a Cloud of Water Droplets[J]. Shock Waves, 2010, 20(4): 285-296.　　　　　　　　　　　　　　收稿日期:2017-10-16；修订日期:2017-12-11。基金项目:国家自然科学基金面上项目(51475462)。作者简介:谢建,男,博士,教授,研究领域为兵器发射理论与技术。E-mail: xiejian1967@126.com通讯作者:谢政,男,博士生,研究领域为火箭发射燃气气体动力学。E-mail: xiez19891121@163.com(编辑:田佳莹)