双模态超燃冲压发动机准一维流耦合方法与验证 *

推进技术 ›› 2018, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (4): 731-739.

双模态超燃冲压发动机准一维流耦合方法与验证 *

陈兵,龚春林,谷良贤

西北工业大学航天学院陕西省空天飞行器设计重点实验室，陕西西安 710072,西北工业大学航天学院陕西省空天飞行器设计重点实验室，陕西西安 710072,西北工业大学航天学院陕西省空天飞行器设计重点实验室，陕西西安 710072

发布日期:2021-08-15
作者简介:陈兵，男，博士生，研究领域为机体/推进一体化。
基金资助:
国家自然基金青年基金(11502209)。

Analysis and Verification of Quasi One Dimensional Flow for Dual Mode Scramjet

Shaanxi Aerospace Flight Vehicle Design Key Laboratory，School of Astronautics，Northwestern Polytechnical University，Xi’an 710072，China,Shaanxi Aerospace Flight Vehicle Design Key Laboratory，School of Astronautics，Northwestern Polytechnical University，Xi’an 710072，China and Shaanxi Aerospace Flight Vehicle Design Key Laboratory，School of Astronautics，Northwestern Polytechnical University，Xi’an 710072，China

Published:2021-08-15

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为改善双模态超燃冲压发动机的耦合分析精度和计算周期过长问题，提出了一种基于准一维流的内流耦合分析方法，该方法适用于隔离段和双模态燃烧室的耦合求解，解决了亚燃模态下由于热壅塞而产生的背压问题，完成隔离段和燃烧室的流场匹配分析，得到双模态流场和火箭基组合循环发动机在亚燃和超燃模态下的沿程流动特性。研究结果表明:(1)相对于双模态超燃冲压发动机直连试验结果，亚燃模态下隔离段的分离点预测误差在1.4%～11.2%，流道峰值压强预测误差在15.6%～21.6%，流道沿程压强预测的平均误差在9.6%以内，在超燃模态下，峰值压强预测误差小于3.75%，峰值压强的位置预测误差小于2%。(2)相对于RBCC发动机一体化自由射流试验结果，分离点预测误差小于2.1%，流道沿程压强平均误差小于10.5%。对于双模态超燃冲压发动机，本文方法具有一定的可信度。

关键词: 双模态；冲压发动机；准一维流；耦合；试验验证

Abstract: In order to improve analyzed precision and long period of calculation problem for dual mode scramjet， a coupling method for internal flow analysis is presented based on the quasi one dimensional flow. Such method can be used in the coupling analysis of isolator and combustor of dual mode scramjet. It solves the back pressure matching problems of the isolator and the combustor which is caused by thermal choking in ramjet mode. The flow matching analysis of isolator and combustor is completed， and the flow performance along the channel of dual mode scramjet and rocket based combined cycle (RBCC) engine in ramjet and scramjet mode is obtained. The results show that， (1) Comparing to direct connection test of dual mode scramjet mode， the predicted error of separated point of the flow in isolator is between 1.4% and 11.2%， and the predicted error of the maximum pressure is between 15.6% and 21.6%， but the average error of the pressure along the channel is less than 9.6% in ramjet mode. In scramjet mode， the predicted error of the maximum pressure is less than 3.75%， and the error of the location of the maximum pressure is less than 2%. (2) Comparing to integral free jet test of RBCC engine， the predicted error of flow’s separated point in isolator is less than 2.1%， the average error of the pressure along the engine’s channel is less than 10.5%. The comparison shows that the quasi 1-D method in this paper has certain credibility for dual mode scramjet.

Key words: Dual mode；Ramjet；Quasi one dimensional flow；Coupling；Verification

陈兵,龚春林,谷良贤. 双模态超燃冲压发动机准一维流耦合方法与验证 *[J]. 推进技术, 2018, 39(4): 731-739.

CHEN Bing,GONG Chun-lin,GU Liang-xian. Analysis and Verification of Quasi One Dimensional Flow for Dual Mode Scramjet[J]. Journal of Propulsion Technology, 2018, 39(4): 731-739.

参考文献

[1] Michael A Bolender, David B Doman. A Non-Linear Model for the Longitudinal Dynamics of a Hypersonic Air-Breathing Vehicle[R]. AIAA 2005-6255
[2] Engelund W C, Holland S D, Crockrell C E, et al. Aerodynamic Database Development for the Hyper-X Airframe Integrated Scramjet Propulsion Experiments[J]. Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets, 2001, 38(6): 803-810.
[3] Woods W C, Holland S D, DiFuvio M. Hyper-X Stage Separation Wind-Tunnel Test Program[J]. Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets, 2001, 38(6): 811-819.
[4] Cockrell C E Jr, Engelund W C. Integrated Aero-Propulsive CFD Methodology for the Hyper-X Flight Experiment [R]. AIAA 2000-4010.
[5] Parikh P, Engelund W, Armand S, et al. Evaluation of a CFD Method for Aerodynamic Database Development using the Hyper-X Stack Configuration[R]. AIAA 2004-5385.
[6] 郭金磊, 谷良贤, 龚春林. 一种改进的冲压发动机一维流分析模型[J]. 推进技术, 2014, 35(5): 584-590. (GUO Jin-lei, GU Liang-xian, GONG Chun-lin. An Improved One-Dimensional Analysis Model for Ramjet [J]. Journal of Propulsion Technology, 2014, 35(5):584-590.)
[7] 石喜勤, 陈兵, 徐旭, 等. 冲压发动机进气道/燃烧室/尾喷管耦合流场计算[J]. 推进技术, 2008, 29(5): 557-561. (SHI Xi-qin, CHEN Bing, XU Xu, et al. Inlet/Combustor/Nozzle Coupled Flow Field Calculation for Ramjet[J]. Journal of Propulsion Technology, 2008, 29(5): 557-561.)
[8] Chen Bing, Xu Xu, Cai Guobiao. A Multi-Code CFD Solver for the Efficient Simulation of Ramjet/Scramjet Inlet-Engine Coupled Flowfields[R]. AIAA 2007-5414.
[9] Keith Numbers. Development of a Coupled Inlet-Engine Dynamic Analysis Method [R]. AIAA 97-2880.
[10] Keith Numbers. Conservation Coupling Technique for Dynamic Inlet-Engine Analysis[J]. Journal of Propulsion and Power, 2003, 19(3): 444-455.
[11] Malcolm Rowe, Andmark B Sussman. Development of High-Response Data Analysis AIDS for Inlet-Engine Testing [J]. Journal of Aircraft, 1971, 8(5): 307-311.
[12] William M Shain, Palmer E Burris. Dynamic Test Method for Supersonic Inlet/Engine Development[C]. Washington DC: Aerodynamic Testing Conference, 1966.
[13] Denny A G, Horine J T, Nichols R H, et al. Inlet/Engine Integration Examples Using Coupled Transient and Steady Engine Performance Models with Kestrel[R]. AIAA 2014-0753.
[14] Murma S M. Coupled Numerical Simulation of the External and Engine Inlet Flows for the F-18 at Large Incidence [R]. AIAA 92-2621.
[15] Campbell J L, Ellisf S H. Engine/Inlet Compatibility Analysis Procedure[J]. Journal of Aircraft, 1971, 8(5): 301-307.
[16] Campbell J L, Ellis S. Inlet-Engine Compatability Analysis[R]. AIAA 70-0941.
[17] Beverly Duncan. Computational Analysis of Ramjet Engine Inlet Interaction[R]. AIAA 92-3102.
[18] Hong-Gye Sung. A Unified Analysis of Ramjet Operation in an Integrated Rocket Ramjet Engine Part I.Transition from Rocket Booster to Ramjet Sustainer[R]. AIAA 2001-3460.
[19] Sung H G, Hsieh S Y, Yang V. A Unified Analysis of Ramjet Operation in an Integrated Rocket Ramjet Engine Part II.Combustion Dynamics of Ramjet Engine[R]. AIAA 2001-3192.
[20] Rodrick V Chima. Coupled Analysis of an Inlet and Fan for a Quiet Supersonic Jet[R]. AIAA 2010-479.
[21] Smart M K. Flow Modeling of Pseudoshocks in Backpressured Ducts[J]. AIAA Journal, 2015, 53(12): 3577-3588.
[22] Ortwerth P J. Scramjet Vehicle Integration[M]. Reston: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Inc., 2001.
[23] 余勇, 刘卫东, 王振国. 超声速燃烧室性能一维数值模拟[J]. 流体力学实验与测量, 2004, 18(3): 36-41.
[24] Heiser W H, Pratt D T. Hypersonic Airbreathing Propulsion[M]. Washington DC: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Inc., 1994: 237-242.
[25] Matthew L F, James F D. Isolator-Combustor Interactions in a Direct-Connect Ramjet-Scramjet Experiment[J]. Journal of Propulsion and Power, 2012, 28(1): 83-95.　　　　　　　　　　　　　*　收稿日期:2017-04-17；修订日期:2017-05-31。基金项目:国家自然基金青年基金(11502209)。作者简介:陈兵,男,博士生,研究领域为机体/推进一体化。E-mail: chen159621@126.com(编辑:梅瑛)