含裂纹铝合金板单面修补结构疲劳裂纹扩展分析 *

推进技术 ›› 2018, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (4): 865-871.

含裂纹铝合金板单面修补结构疲劳裂纹扩展分析 *

王跃¹,熊玉平²,赵霞³,包利贞¹

海军航空工程学院青岛校区，山东青岛 266041,中国船舶工业系统工程研究院，北京 100094,青岛大学应用技术学院，山东青岛 266071,海军航空工程学院青岛校区，山东青岛 266041

发布日期:2021-08-15
作者简介:王跃，男，博士生，研究领域为复合材料胶接修补。

Analysis of Fatigue Crack Propagation for Repaired Aluminum Alloy Plate Containing Crack with Single Patch

Qingdao Branch of Naval Aeronautical Academy，Qingdao 266041，China,China Ship Building Industry System Engineering Research Institute，Beijing 100094，China,Applied Technology Institute of Qingdao University，Qingdao 266071，China and Qingdao Branch of Naval Aeronautical Academy，Qingdao 266041，China

Published:2021-08-15

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为了研究单面修补结构疲劳裂纹的扩展规律，进行了玻璃纤维/环氧树脂复合材料单面修补含裂纹铝合金板的疲劳试验，并建立了基于斜裂纹前沿(UCF，Uniform Crack Front)和基于垂直裂纹前沿(SCF，Skew Crack Front)的三维有限元模型。利用数理统计方法和有限元模型得到了不同裂纹长度时的有效应力强度因子(ESIF，Effective Stress Intensity Factor)值，采用应力强度因子修正法从疲劳试验结果中获得了修补结构不同裂纹长度时应力强度因子(SIF，Stress Intensity Factor)值[Kexp]，并使用有限元模型的ESIF值和[Kexp]预测了修补结构的疲劳寿命。通过分析得到以下结论:同基于UCF有限元模型相比，基于SCF有限元模型的ESIF更接近于[Kexp]。在预测疲劳寿命时，基于UCF有限元模型预测结果误差较大，与试验中值寿命的最大误差可达到19%；而基于SCF有限元模型各ESIF预测结果与试验中值寿命的误差都在6%之内，与试验结果一致性较好。

关键词: 斜裂纹前沿；垂直裂纹前沿；有限元模型；有效应力强度因子；疲劳寿命；疲劳裂纹扩展

Abstract: In order to study the fatigue crack growth behavior of repaired plate with single-side composite patch， single-edge cracked aluminum alloy plates repaired with single-side glass fiber/epoxy resin composite patch were subjected to fatigue test， and two three-dimensional finite element models of repaired structures based on Uniform Crack Front (UCF) and Skew Crack Front (SCF) were established. By using the mathematical statistic method and finite element models， several Effective Stress Intensity Factors (ESIF) for different crack length were obtained， which were compared with Stress Intensity Factor (SIF) [Kexp] from experimental results by SIF correction method. The fatigue life of repaired structures were predicted by ESIF and[Kexp]. It is concluded that， compared with finite element model based on UCF， the value of SIF from finite element model based on UCF is more close to that from experimental results. When predicting the fatigue life of repaired structures， the biggest error between the results from finite element model based on UCF and the median fatigue life from experimental results is 19%， while the errors between the results from finite element model based on SCF and the median fatigue life from experimental results are within 6%， which illustrating that finite element model based on SCF is more suitable for predicting the fatigue life.

Key words: Skew crack front；Uniform crack front；Finite element model；Effective stress intensity factor；Fatigue life；Fatigue crack propagation

王跃,熊玉平,赵霞,包利贞. 含裂纹铝合金板单面修补结构疲劳裂纹扩展分析 *[J]. 推进技术, 2018, 39(4): 865-871.

WANG Yue¹,XIONG Yu-ping²,ZHAO Xia³,BAO Li-zhen¹. Analysis of Fatigue Crack Propagation for Repaired Aluminum Alloy Plate Containing Crack with Single Patch[J]. Journal of Propulsion Technology, 2018, 39(4): 865-871.

参考文献

[1] Baker A A. Repair of Cracked or Defective Metallic Aircraft Components with Advanced Fiber Composites[J]. Composite Structure, 1984, 2(2): 153-234.
[2] 苏维国, 穆志韬, 朱做涛, 等. 金属裂纹复合材料单面胶接修补结构应力分析[J]. 复合材料学报, 2014, 31(3): 772-780.
[3] 郝建滨, 李旭东, 穆志韬. 金属裂纹板复合材料胶接修补强度的弹塑性有限元预测[J]. 复合材料学报, 2015, 33(3): 643-649.
[4] 韩允, 刘元海, 肖晓辉. 复合材料胶接修补结构有限元分析方法研究[J]. 直升机技术, 2016, 3: 32-35.
[5] Baker A A. Bonded Composite Repair of Fatigue-Cracked Primary Aircraft Structure[J]. Composite Structure, 1999, 47: 431-437.
[6] Crooks H. Reduction of Thermal Residual Strains in Adhesively Bonded Composite Repairs[D]. USAF: MSc Thesis, Air Force Institute of Technology, 2003.
[7] Schubbe J J, Mall S. Investigation of a Cracked Thick Aluminum Panel Repaired with a Bonded Composite Patch[J]. Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 1999, 63:305-323.
[8] Chukwujekwu O A, Singh N, Enemuoh U, et al. Design, Analysis and Performance of Adhesively Bonded Composite Patch Repair of Cracked Aluminum Aircraft Panels[J]. Composite Structure, 2005, 71(2): 258-270.
[9] Seo D C, Lee J J. Fatigue Crack Growth Behavior of Cracked Aluminum Plate Repaired with Composite Patch[J]. Composite Structure, 2002, 57(1-4): 323-330.
[10] Hosseini-Toudeshky H, Sadeghi G, Daghyani H R. Three-dimensional Approach to Fatigue Crack Propagation for Aluminum Panels Repaired with Single-Sided Composite Laminates[C]. Australia: 4th Asian-Australasian Conference on Composite Material, 2004.
[11] Hosseini-Toudeshky H, Sadeghi G, Daghyani H R. Experimental Fatigue Crack Growth and Crack-Front Shape Analysis of Asymmetric Repaired Aluminum Panels with Glass/Epoxy Composite Patches[J]. Composite Structure, 2005, 71: 401-406.
[12] 杨孚标. 复合材料修补含中心裂纹铝合金板的静态与疲劳特性研究[D]. 长沙:国防科学技术大学, 2006.
[13] Lee W Y, Lee J J. Successive 3D FE Analysis Technique for Characterization of Fatigue Crack Growth Behavior in Composite-Repaired Aluminum Plate[J]. Composite Structure, 2004, 66(1-4): 513-520.
[14] 石亦平, 周玉蓉. ABAQUS 有限元分析实例详解 [M]. 北京:机械工业出版社, 2006.
[15] 刘万雷, 常新龙, 张晓军, 等. 缠绕复合材料壳体低速冲击损伤试验与仿真研究[J]. 推进技术, 2017, 38(1): 172-178. (LIU Wan-lei, CHANG Xin-long, ZHANG Xiao-jun, et al. Experimental and Numerical Analysis of Filament Winding Composite Shell under Low-Velocity Impact[J]. Journal of Propulsion Technology, 2017, 38(1): 172-178.)
[16] 高海朋, 刘猛, 王浚. 基于疲劳寿命的复合材料舱体分级优化分析[J]. 推进技术, 2013, 34(11): 1549-1556. (GAO Hai-peng, LIU Meng, WANG Jun.Graded Optimization and Analysis of Composite Cabin Based on Fatigue Life[J]. Journal of Propulsion Technology, 2013, 34(11): 1549-1556.)　　　　　　　　　　　　　*　收稿日期:2017-02-08；修订日期:2017-03-22。作者简介:王跃,男,博士生,研究领域为复合材料胶接修补。E-mail: 807697221@qq.com(编辑:田佳莹)