减弱喷管侧向力的变形喷管技术研究

推进技术 ›› 2018, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (5): 986-992.

减弱喷管侧向力的变形喷管技术研究

闫胜,武洁,叶正寅

西北工业大学航空学院，陕西西安 710072,西北工业大学航空学院，陕西西安 710072,西北工业大学航空学院，陕西西安 710072

发布日期:2021-08-15
作者简介:闫胜，男，硕士生，研究领域为火箭发动机喷管。
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金(11272262)。

Research on Morphing Nozzle Technology for Reducing Side Loads

School of Aeronautics，Northwestern Polytechnical University，Xi’an 710072，China,School of Aeronautics，Northwestern Polytechnical University，Xi’an 710072，China and School of Aeronautics，Northwestern Polytechnical University，Xi’an 710072，China

Published:2021-08-15

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为了改善大面积比过膨胀喷管的侧向力问题，提高火箭发动机喷管的整体性能，提出一种变形喷管抑制侧向力的技术方案。以VOLVO-S1喷管扩张段壁面为基本研究模型，通过在Y轴方向施加一对对称作动力后，使得喷管扩张段壁面沿X轴方向的各截面由圆形变为椭圆形，以此来改变喷管的面积比和流道特性，从而实现减小侧向力的目标。运用求解雷诺平均N-S方程的数值方法，对上述变形喷管的流场变化开展了相应研究，结果表明:在施加一定大小作动力后，喷管出口面积减小约0.98％，变形后的喷管相比于原喷管在推力损失较小的情况下可以将Y方向侧向力的峰值降为原来的60%，同时可以使得Z方向的侧向力峰值降为原来的一半。此外，变形喷管在落压比为15.2～15.3期间发生自由激波分离向受限激波分离的转换，相比于VOLVO-S1喷管的激波模式转换会有所延迟。最后分析了变形喷管的方案导致侧向力降低的原因。

关键词: 过膨胀；侧向力；变形喷管；面积比；激波分离

Abstract: In order to ameliorate the side load problem of the large area ratio overexpansion nozzle and improve the overall performance of the rocket engine nozzle， a technique scheme of morphing nozzle was proposed to reduce the side loads. Taking the expansion section of VOLVO-S1 nozzle wall as the basic research model， the cross-section of the nozzle wall in the X-axis direction was changed from circular to elliptical by applying a pair of symmetrical forces in the Y-axis direction. The area ratio of the nozzle and the flow path characteristics were changed so that the goal of reducing the side loads can be achieved. By using the numerical method for solving the Reynolds averaged N-S equation， the corresponding changes in the flow field of the morphing nozzle were carried out. The results show that after exerting a certain size force， the nozzle outlet area is reduced by 0.98%， the peak of side loads of morphing nozzle in the Y direction can be reduced to 60% of the original with a small thrust loss， at the same time， the side loads in the Z direction can be nearly made down to half of the original nozzle. Additionally， the transformation from freedom shock separation to restricted shock separation occurs at nozzle pressure ratio being 15.2～15.3 in the morphing nozzle， which is delayed compared to the shock mode transition of the VOLVO-S1 nozzle. Finally， the reason why the side loads are reduced in the morphing nozzle is analyzed.

Key words: Overexpansion；Side loads；Morphing nozzle；Area ratio；Shock separation

闫胜,武洁,叶正寅. 减弱喷管侧向力的变形喷管技术研究[J]. 推进技术, 2018, 39(5): 986-992.

YAN Sheng,WU Jie ,YE Zheng-yin. Research on Morphing Nozzle Technology for Reducing Side Loads[J]. Journal of Propulsion Technology, 2018, 39(5): 986-992.

参考文献

[1] 叶正寅, 吕广亮. 火箭发动机喷管非定常侧向力和流固耦合研究进展[J]. 航空工程进展, 2015, 6(1): 1-12.
[2] 陈林泉, 侯晓. 喷管分离流场计算[J]. 固体火箭技术, 1996, 19(4): 18-23.
[3] Igra D. Numerical Simulation of Nozzle Starting Flow[J]. Journal of Spacecraft & Rockets, 2015, 53(1): 1-8.
[4] Zhang S, Shotorban B, Pohly J, et al. Aeroelastic Response of Rocket Nozzles Subected to Combined Thrust and Side Loads[C]. Dallas: AIAA Computational Fluid Dynamics Conference, 2006.
[5] Hagemann G, Immich H, Nguyen T V, et al. Advanced Rocket Nozzles[J]. Journal of Propulsion & Power, 1998, 14(5): 620-634.
[6] Stark R, Nürnbergergénin C. Side Loads in Dual Bell Nozzles, Part I: Phenomenology[C]. Nashville: AIAA Joint Propulsion Conference, 2010.
[7] Frey M, Hagemann G. Critical Assessment of Dual-Bell Nozzles[J]. Journal of Propulsion & Power, 1999, 15(1): 137-143.
[8] 马宏瑞, 张扬军, 郑孟伟, 等. 双钟型喷管高度补偿特性的数值分析[J]. 推进技术, 2003, 24(6): 505-508. (MA Hong-rui, ZHANG Yang-jun, ZHENG Meng-wei, et al. Numerical Analysis on the Performance of Dual-Bell Nozzle[J]. Journal of Propulsion Technology, 2003, 24(6): 505-508.)
[9] Massimo Ferlin. Assessment and Benchmarking of the Extendible Nozzle Systems in the Liquid Propulsion[R].AIAA 2012-4163.
[10] Hidemasa Miyamoto, Akiko Matsuo, Takayuki Kojima. Effects of Sidewall Configurations on Rectangular Plug Nozzle Performance[R]. AIAA 2006-4373.
[11] 王柏懿, 郭唐稳, 王世芬, 等. 一种单级入轨火箭发动机概念—气动塞式喷管发动机[J]. 力学进展, 2000, 30(2): 283-294.
[12] 宋明德, 张涵信. 火箭发动机塞式喷管流场的数值研究[J]. 推进技术, 2000, 21(5): 19-21. (SONG Ming-de, ZHANG Han-xin. Numerical Investigation on Flow Field of Rocket[J]. Journal of Propulsion Technology, 2000, 21(5): 19-21.)
[13] Schomberg K A, Olsen J, Neely A J, et al. Suppressing Restricted Shock Separation in Thrust-Optimized Rocket Nozzles Using Contour Geometry[C]. Orlando: AIAA/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference, 2015.
[14] Ralf Stark. Flow Separation in Rocket Nozzles-An Overview[R]. AIAA 2013-3840.
[15] Aghababaie A A, Theunissen R. Modeling Free Shock Separation Induced Side Loads in Overexpanded Rocket Nozzles[J]. AIAA Journal, 2014, 53(1): 93-103.
[16] 李耿, 侯晓, 陈慧, 等. 固体火箭发动机喷管分离流场数值模拟及试验研究[J]. 固体火箭技术, 2013, 36(3): 324-328.
[17] Lijo V, Kim H D, Setoguchi T, et al. Numerical Simulation of Transient Flows in a Rocket Propulsion Nozzle[J]. International Journal of Heat & Fluid Flow, 2010, 31(3): 409-417.
[18] Ralf Stark, Chloe Genin. Optimization of a Rocket Nozzle Side Load Reduction Device[R]. AIAA 2012-3970.
[19] ?stlund J. Flow Processes in Rocket Engine Nozzles with Focus on Flow Separation and Side-Loads[D]. Malaysia: Mekanik, 2002.
[20] 胡海峰. 液体火箭发动机推力室一体化设计分析关键技术研究[D]. 西安:西北工业大学, 2012.
[21] 林震, 王长辉, 刘宇, 等. 喷管分离流动及其侧向载荷[J]. 北京航空航天大学学报, 2010, 36(3):307-310.　　　　　　　　　　　　　*　收稿日期:2017-03-11；修订日期:2017-06-21。基金项目:国家自然科学基金(11272262)。作者简介:闫胜,男,硕士生,研究领域为火箭发动机喷管。E-mail: 18710756825@163.com(编辑:梅瑛)