预旋系统稳态和非稳态计算对比研究

doi:10.13675/j.cnki. tjjs. 180641

推进技术 ›› 2019, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (11): 2546-2553.DOI: 10.13675/j.cnki. tjjs. 180641

预旋系统稳态和非稳态计算对比研究

梁靓¹,刘高文¹,雷昭¹,冯青¹

西北工业大学动力与能源学院

发布日期:2021-08-15
作者简介:梁靓，硕士生，研究领域为发动机空气系统和旋转盘腔中的流动传热。E-mail：1159116599@qq.com
基金资助:
国家科技重大专项 2017-III-0011-0037国家科技重大专项（2017-III-0011-0037）。

A Comparative Study on Steady and Unsteady Calculations of a Pre-Swirl System

School of Power and Energy，Northwestern Polytechnical University，Xi’an 710072，China

Published:2021-08-15

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 针对预旋系统由于旋转引起流场和温度场参数周期性瞬态变化的问题，分别采用滑移网格的瞬态法和固定转子相位的稳态法进行数值求解，并在稳态计算中通过改变转子相位来近似模拟非稳态问题的时空变化特性。通过稳态空间平均结果与非稳态时均结果的对比，以期为预旋系统非稳态问题的低成本求解提供方法依据。结果表明：稳态计算结果与非稳态计算结果相比，周期性波动频率一致，接受孔进口处，稳态计算的压力波动幅度小39%左右，温度波动幅度小15%左右；多个相位的稳态空间平均结果与非稳态时均结果相比，压力高0.2%，温度低0.1%；采用多个计算周期数与单个周期的非稳态计算结果差异微小。当采用喷嘴出口气流中心正对接受孔迎风面前缘的转子相位时，稳态计算结果与非稳态计算时均结果最接近。

关键词: 预旋系统;对比;非稳态;转子相位;时均

Abstract: In order to solve the problem of periodic transient changes of flow parameters and temperature caused by rotation in a pre-swirl system, the transient method with sliding mesh and the steady-state method with frozen rotor approach were used， respectively. The time-space characteristics of unsteady problems were approximated by changing rotor phase in the steady-state calculation. To find a low cost solving method for the unsteady-state problem in a pre-swirl system, the steady-state space-averaged results and the unsteady-state time-averaged results were compared extensively. The results show that the periodic fluctuation frequency of steady-state calculation is consistent with that of unsteady-state calculation. At the inlet of the receiving hole, the pressure fluctuation amplitude calculated by steady-state method is about 39% smaller than that calculated by unsteady-state method, and the temperature fluctuation amplitude is about 15% smaller. Compared with the unsteady-state time-averaged results, the steady-state space-average results of multiple rotor positions show that the pressure is 0.2% higher and the temperature is 0.1% lower. There is little difference between the unsteady calculation results with multiple calculation periods and those with single period. When the rotor is located at this position where the nozzle outlet air flow is opposite to the front edge of the receiving hole windward side, the steady-state calculation results are the closest to the unsteady-state calculation results.

Key words: Pre-swirl system;Comparison;Unsteady-state;Rotor phase;Time-averaged

梁靓,刘高文,雷昭,冯青. 预旋系统稳态和非稳态计算对比研究[J]. 推进技术, 2019, 40(11): 2546-2553.

LIANG Liang¹,LIU Gao-wen¹,LEI Zhao¹,FENG Qing¹. A Comparative Study on Steady and Unsteady Calculations of a Pre-Swirl System[J]. Journal of Propulsion Technology, 2019, 40(11): 2546-2553.

参考文献

[1] El-Oun Z B, Owen J M. Pre-Swirl Blade Cooling Effectiveness in an Diabatic Rotor-Stator System[R]. ASME 1988-GT-267.
[2] Chew J W， Hills N J， Khalatov S， et al. Measurement and Analysis of Flow in a Pre-Swirled Cooling Air Delivery System[R]. ASME 2003-GT-38084.
[3] Dittmann M， Dullenkopf K， Wittig S. Direct-Transfer Pre-Swirl System: a One Dimensional Modular Characterization of the Flow[R]. ASME 2003-GT-38312.
[4] Jarzombek K， Benra F K， Dohmen H J， et al. CFD Analysis of Flow in High-Radius Pre-Swirl Systems[R]. ASME 2007-GT-27404.
[5] Snowsill G D， Young C. The Application of CFD to Underpin the Design of Gas Turbine Pre-Swirl Systems[R]. ASME 2006-GT-90443.
[6] Ciampoli F， Hills N J， Chew J W， et al. Unsteady Numerical Simulation of the Flow in a Direct Transfer Pre-Swirl System[R]. ASME 2008-GT-51198.
[7] Benim A C， Brillert D， Cagan M. Investigation into the Computational Analysis of Direct-Transfer Pre-Swirl Systems for Gas Turbine Cooling[R]. ASME 2004-GT-54151.
[8] Karnahl Joachim， Jens von Wolfersdorf， Tham Kok-Mun， et al. CFD Simulations of Flow and Heat Transfer in a Pre-Swirl System: Influence of Rotating-Stationary Domain Interface[R]. ASME 2011-GT-45085.
[9] Anish Kumar Gupta， Ramerth Douglas. Numerical Simulation of TOBI Flow-Analysis of the Cavity Between a Seal-Plate and HPT Disk with Pumping Vanes[R]. ASME 2008-GT-50739.
[10] 罗翔，冯野，徐国强，等. 直接供气预旋转静系流动和换热数值模拟[J]. 航空动力学报， 2012， 27(10): 2188-2193.
[11] 朱晓华，刘高文，刘松龄，等. 带盖板的预旋系统温降和压力损失数值研究[J]. 航空动力学报， 2010， 25(11): 2498-2506.
[12] 朱晓华. 带盖板的预旋系统数值研究[D]. 西安：西北工业大学， 2010.
[13] 何振威，冯青，刘松龄，等. 带盖板预旋进气系统的温降实验误差分析[J]. 科学技术与工程， 2010， 10(26): 6439-6444.
[14] WU Heng， LIU Gao-wen， WU Zhi-peng， et al. Measurement of Pressures and Temperatures in a Cover-Plate Pre-Swirl System[R]. ASME 2018-GT-75671.
[15] LIU Gao-wen， WU Heng， FENG Qing， et al. Theoretical and Numerical Analysis on the Temperature Drop and Power Consumption of a Pre-Swirl System[R]. ASME 2016-GT-56742.

预旋系统稳态和非稳态计算对比研究

A Comparative Study on Steady and Unsteady Calculations of a Pre-Swirl System

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 0

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价