超燃冲压发动机燃烧模态转换直连式实验研究

推进技术 ›› 2019, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (2): 339-346.

超燃冲压发动机燃烧模态转换直连式实验研究

肖保国,李莉,张顺平,晏至辉,刘彧

中国空气动力研究与发展中心高超声速冲压发动机技术重点实验室，四川绵阳 621000,中国空气动力研究与发展中心高超声速冲压发动机技术重点实验室，四川绵阳 621000,中国空气动力研究与发展中心高超声速冲压发动机技术重点实验室，四川绵阳 621000,中国空气动力研究与发展中心高超声速冲压发动机技术重点实验室，四川绵阳 621000,中国空气动力研究与发展中心高超声速冲压发动机技术重点实验室，四川绵阳 621000

发布日期:2021-08-15
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金(91441204；51376193)。

Direct-Connect Experimental Investigation of Combustion Mode Transition for Scramjet Engine

Science and Technology on Scramjet Laboratory，China Aerodynamics Research and Development Center， Mianyang 621000，China,Science and Technology on Scramjet Laboratory，China Aerodynamics Research and Development Center， Mianyang 621000，China,Science and Technology on Scramjet Laboratory，China Aerodynamics Research and Development Center， Mianyang 621000，China,Science and Technology on Scramjet Laboratory，China Aerodynamics Research and Development Center， Mianyang 621000，China and Science and Technology on Scramjet Laboratory，China Aerodynamics Research and Development Center， Mianyang 621000，China

Published:2021-08-15

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为获得燃烧模态转换过程对超燃冲压发动机工作特性的影响，在直连式实验台上，通过液态煤油流量的线性变化，开展了飞行马赫数4.5条件下燃烧室不同工作模态的转换实验。通过对特征位置和参数的监测，实现了燃烧模态的实时判别，获得了燃烧模态转换过程对发动机性能的影响规律。实验结果表明，在燃烧模态转换过程中滞环现象明显，燃烧室压力和发动机推力性能存在突变。在燃油流量以相同的速率增加和减小过程中发生模态转换时刻的燃油当量比存在差异，分别为0.55和0.488，两个转换点燃烧室比推相差8.05%。在滞环区间内，对于同一当量比，会存在两个不同燃烧模态，对应不同的发动机推力性能。

关键词: 超燃冲压发动机；燃烧模态；转换；直连式；实验

Abstract: In order to find the effects of combustion mode transition on scramjet operating characteristics， a direct-connect experiment of combustion mode transition， which realized using linear change of liquid kerosene mass flow rate， was carried out. The inlet flow conditions of isolator accord with the flight Mach number 4.5 in this experiment. Based on monitoring of typical parameters in the characteristic position， the combustion mode could be distinguished in real time， and the influence law of combustion mode transition on scramjet performance was also achieved. Results show that parameter catastrophe includes wall pressure and thrust performance occurred during the mode transition process， and hysteresis phenomenon was obvious. When the flow rate of kerosene increases and decreases at the same rate， the equivalence ratio was different at the time of mode transition， and the ratio was 0.55 and 0.488， respectively. At equivalence ratio 0.488， results show 8.05% lower in combustor specific thrust than that of equivalence ratio 0.55. There was a different combustion mode for the same equivalence ratio in the hysteresis interval， corresponding to different thrust performance of scramjet engine.

Key words: Scramjet；Combustion mode；Transition；Direct connect；Experiment

肖保国,李莉,张顺平,晏至辉,刘彧. 超燃冲压发动机燃烧模态转换直连式实验研究[J]. 推进技术, 2019, 40(2): 339-346.

XIAO Bao-guo,LI Li,ZHANG Shun-ping,YAN Zhi-hui,LIU Yu. Direct-Connect Experimental Investigation of Combustion Mode Transition for Scramjet Engine[J]. Journal of Propulsion Technology, 2019, 40(2): 339-346.

参考文献

[1] Ye Tian, Baoguo Xiao, Shunping Zhang, et al. Experimental and Computational Study on Combustion Performance of a Kerosene Fueled Dual-mode Scramjet Engine[J]. Aerospace Science and Technology, 2015, 46: 451–458.
[2] 王西耀, 肖保国, 田野, 等. 当量比对燃烧模态的影响机理分析[J]. 推进技术, 2015, 36(4): 488-494.(WANG Xi-yao, XIAO Bao-guo, TIAN Ye, et al. The Analysis of Influence of Fuel-Air Ratio on the Mechanism of Combustion Mode[J]. Journal of Propulsion Technology, 2015, 36(4): 488-494.)
[3] 张岩, 朱韶华, 刘刚, 等. 双模态冲压发动机中的模态转换研究综述[J]. 推进技术, 2013, 34(12):1719-1728. (ZHANG Yan, ZHU Shao-hua, LIU Gang, et al. An Overview on Mode Transition in Dual Mode Ramjet[J]. Journal of Propulsion Technology, 2013, 34(12): 1719-1728.)
[4] Sullins G A. Demonstration of Mode Transition in a Scramjet Combustor[J]. Journal of Propulsion and Power, 1993, 9(4): 515-520.
[5] Ryou Masumoto, Sadatake Tomioka, Kenji Kudo, et al. Experimental Study on Combustion Modes in a Scramjet Engine[R]. AIAA 2008-2645.
[6] Sadatake Tomioka, Tetsuo Hiraiwa, Kan Kobayashi, et al. Vitiation Effects on Scramjet Engine Performance in Mach 6 Flight Conditions[J]. Journal of Propulsion and Power, 2007, 23(4): 789-796.
[7] Robert D Rockwell Jr, Christopher P Goyne, Willie Haw, et al. Experimental Study of Test-Medium Vitiation Effects on Dual-Mode Scramjet Performance[J]. Journal of Propulsion and Power, 2011, 27(5): 1135-1142.
[8] Takeshi Kanda, Nobuo Chinzei, Kenji Kudo, et al. Dual-Mode Operations in a Scramjet Combustor[J]. Journal of Propulsion and Power, 2004, 20(4): 760-763.
[9] 潘余, 李大鹏, 刘卫东, 等. 超燃冲压发动机燃烧模态转换试验研究[J]. 爆炸与冲击, 2008, 28(4): 293-297.
[10] Takahashi Shuhei, Yamano Goro, Wakai Kazunori, et al. Flowfield in a Model Scramjet Combustor in Case of Injecting Fuel Perpendicularly Behind the Backward-Step[J]. Journal of the Japan Society for Aeronautical and Space Sciences, 1999, 47(548): 333-339.
[11] Le D B, Goyne C P, Krauss R H, et al. Experimental Study of a Dual-Mode Scramjet Isolator[J]. Journal of Propulsion and Power, 2008, 24(5): 1050-1057.
[12] Mitani T, Chinzei N, Kanda T. Reaction and Mixing-Controlled Combustion in Scramjet Engines[J]. Journal of Propulsion and Power, 2001, 17(2): 308–314.
[13] Takahashi S, Demise S, Oshita M. Correlation Between Heat Flux Distribution and Combustion Mode in a Scramjet Combustor[R]. AIAA 2001-1191.
[14] Le D B, Goyne C P, Krauss R H. Experimental Study of a Dual-Mode Scramjet Isolator[J]. Journal of Propulsion and Power, 2008, 24(5): 1050–1057.
[15] Fotia M L, Driscoll J F. Isolator Combustor Interactions in a Direct-Connect Ramjet-Scramjet Experiment[J]. Journal of Propulsion and Power, 2012, 28(1): 83–95.
[16] Fotia M L, James F Driscoll. Ram-Scram Transition and Flame/Shock-Train Interactions in a Model Scramjet Experiment[J]. Journal of Propulsion and Power, 2013, 29(1): 261-273.
[17] Matthew L Fotia, James F Driscolly. Experimental Investigation of Ram/Scram-Mode Transition Mechanics[R]. AIAA 2012-5835.
[18] 肖保国, 晏至辉, 田野, 等. 超燃发动机燃烧模态判别准则初步研究[J]. 推进技术, 2015, 36(8):1121-1126. (XIAO Bao-guo, YAN Zhi-hui, TIAN Ye, et al. Preliminary Study on Distinguish Criterion of Combustion Mode for Scramjet[J]. Journal of Propulsion Technology, 2015, 36(8): 1121-1126.)
[19] Pan Y, Liu W D, Wang Z G. Investigation on the Combustion Mode Translation of Thermal Choked Scramjet[R]. AIAA 2007-5387.
[20] Heiser W H, Pratt D T. Hypersonic Airbreathing Propulsion[M]. USA: AIAA Education Series, AIAA Pub, 1994.
[21] Cabell K, Hass N, Storch A, et al. HIFiRE Direct-Connect Rig (HDCR) Phase I, Scramjet Test Results from the NASA Langley Arc-Heated Scramjet Test Facility[R]. AIAA 2011-2248.
[22] Storch Andrea M, Michael Bynum, Jiwen Liu, et al. Combustor Operatability and Performance Verification for HIFiRE Flight 2[R]. AIAA 2011-2249.
[23] Baoguo Xiao, Jianwen Xing, Ye Tian, et al. Experimental and Numerical Investigations of Combustion Mode Transition in a Direct–Connect Scramjet Combustor[J]. Aerospace Scienceand Technology, 2015, 46: 331–338.(编辑:史亚红)　　　　　　　　　　　　　　收稿日期:2017-11-21；修订日期:2018-05-09。基金项目:国家自然科学基金(91441204；51376193)。通讯作者:肖保国,博士,副研究员,研究领域为超声速燃烧。E-mail: xbgxl@163.com