叶片加工误差对压气机叶栅气动性能的影响

推进技术 ›› 2017, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (3): 525-531.

叶片加工误差对压气机叶栅气动性能的影响

高丽敏^1,2,蔡宇桐^1,2,曾瑞慧^1,2,田林川^1,2

西北工业大学动力与能源学院，陕西西安 710072; 先进发动机协同创新中心，北京 100191,西北工业大学动力与能源学院，陕西西安 710072; 先进发动机协同创新中心，北京 100191,西北工业大学动力与能源学院，陕西西安 710072; 先进发动机协同创新中心，北京 100191,西北工业大学动力与能源学院，陕西西安 710072; 先进发动机协同创新中心，北京 100191

发布日期:2021-08-15
作者简介:高丽敏，女，博士，教授，研究领域为叶轮机械气动热力学。
基金资助:
国家自然基金重点项目(51236006)；陕西省自然科学基金(2014JM7248)。

Effects of Blade Machining Error on Compressor Cascade Aerodynamic Performance

School of Power and Energy，Northwestern Polytechnical University，Xi’an 710072，China; Collaborative Innovation Center of Advanced Aero-Engine，Beijing 100191，China,School of Power and Energy，Northwestern Polytechnical University，Xi’an 710072，China; Collaborative Innovation Center of Advanced Aero-Engine，Beijing 100191，China,School of Power and Energy，Northwestern Polytechnical University，Xi’an 710072，China; Collaborative Innovation Center of Advanced Aero-Engine，Beijing 100191，China and School of Power and Energy，Northwestern Polytechnical University，Xi’an 710072，China; Collaborative Innovation Center of Advanced Aero-Engine，Beijing 100191，China

Published:2021-08-15

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 压气机叶片在加工过程中会造成加工成型的叶片与设计者的初衷有一定的偏差。为了获知偏差对叶片气动性能的影响，结合我国现有的叶片检测方法，采用单因素法数值研究了叶片扭转、轮廓度、前后缘半径、前后缘形状及弦长误差对叶片气动性能的影响规律。研究结果表明，不同位置、不同大小的误差对性能影响不一，其中叶型扭转、轮廓度及前缘(半径、形状)误差是影响性能的主要参数，而尾缘(半径、形状)误差对性能影响不明显。其中0.5°的扭转误差会恶化性能高达46.56%，0.1mm的轮廓误差最高恶化性能达20.40%。所获得的误差影响规律可以用于提供合理的加工技术要求及制定叶片质量评判标准。

关键词: 加工误差；压气机叶片；平面叶栅；气动性能

Abstract: During the process of manufacturing compressor blades，there are some inevitable machining errors between real blade and designed one. In order to acquire the effects of machining error on aerodynamic performance，different blade errors(errors of twist，profile，shape，radius of leading/trailing edge and chord) on aerodynamic performance have been researched by numerical simulation with single factor method，considering the current blade detection method. The results show that errors in different location(also various size)have different influence on performance. Errors like blade twist，profile and leading edge(shape and radius) are the main influences while trailing edge error(shape and radius) has little effect. Specifically，the twist error of 0.5°deteriorates performance as high as 46.56% and the profile error of 0.1mm deteriorates performance up to 20.40%. The results can provide reasonable machining technology requirement and criteria of blade evaluation.

Key words: Machining error；Compressor blade；Cascade；Aerodynamic performance

高丽敏,蔡宇桐,曾瑞慧,田林川. 叶片加工误差对压气机叶栅气动性能的影响[J]. 推进技术, 2017, 38(3): 525-531.

GAO Li-min^1,2,CAI Yu-tong^1,2,ZENG Rui-hui^1,2,TIAN Lin-chuan^1,2. Effects of Blade Machining Error on Compressor Cascade Aerodynamic Performance[J]. Journal of Propulsion Technology, 2017, 38(3): 525-531.

参考文献

[1] 汤振宁. 航空发动机叶片数控铣削方法研究[D]. 沈阳:沈阳工业大学, 2007.
[2] 金秀杰, 马艳玲, 高见. 压气机叶片型面精密数控加工技术[C]. 贵阳:第十五届中国科协年会第13分会场:航空发动机设计、制造与应用技术研讨会, 2013.
[3] 刘维伟, 李杰光, 赵明, 等. 航空发动机薄壁叶片加工变形误差补偿技术研究[J]. 机械设计与制造, 2009, (10): 175-177.
[4] Garzón, Víctor E. Probabilistic Aerothermal Design of Compressor Airfoils[D]. Massachusetts: Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 2002.
[5] Bammert K, Sandstede H. Influences of Manufacturing Tolerances and Surface Roughness of Blades on the Performance of Turbines[J]. Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power, 1976, 98(1): 29-36.
[6] Roelke R J, Haas J E. The Effect of Rotor Blade Thickness and Surface Finish on the Performance of a Small Axial Flow Turbine[J]. Journal of Engineering of Gas Turbines and Power, 1983, 105(2): 377-382.
[7] Suder K L, Chima R V, Strazisar A J, et al. The Effect of Adding Roughness and Thickness to a Transonic Axial Compressor Rotor[J]. Journal of Turbomachinery, 1995, 117(4): 491-505.
[8] Roberts W B, Armin A, Kassaseya G, et al. The Effect of Variable Chord Length on Transonic Axial Rotor Performance[J]. Journal of Turbomachinery, 2002, 124(3): 351-357.
[9] Garzon V E, Darmofal D L. Impact of Geometric Variability on Axial Compressor Performance[J]. Journal of Turbomachinery, 2003, 125(4): 1199-1213.
[10] Kumar A, Keane A J, Nair P B, et al. Robust Design of Compressor Blades Against Manufacturing Variations[R]. ASME GT 2006-99304.
[11] 张伟昊, 邹正平, 李维, 等. 叶型偏差对涡轮性能影响的非定常数值模拟研究[J]. 航空学报, 2010, 31(11): 2130-2138.
[12] 李宇, 邹正平, 刘火星, 等. 叶片安装角偏差对涡轮通道内热斑迁移的影响[J]. 工程热物理学报, 2009, 30(6): 944-948.
[13] 陆宏志, 吴洋洲, 陆利蓬, 等. 压气机叶片前缘楔形角对前缘分离泡的影响[J]. 工程热物理学报, 2002, 23(5): 569-572.
[14] 刘火星, 李凌, 蒋浩康, 等. 二维NACA65叶型前缘几何形状对气动性能的影响[J]. 工程热物理学报, 2003, 24(2): 231-233.
[15] 凌敬, 杜鑫, 王松涛, 等. 叶型对扩压叶栅角区分离的影响[J]. 推进技术, 2014, 35(9). (LING Jing, DU Xin, WANG Song-tao, et al. Effects of Blade Profile on Corner Separation in Compressor Cascade[J].Journal of Propulsion Technology, 2014, 35(9).)
[16] 韩少冰, 钟兢军. 变冲角下吸力面小翼对压气机叶栅气动性能的影响[J]. 推进技术, 2012, 33(3). (HAN Shao-bing, ZHONG Jing-jun. Effects of Suction-Side Winglet on Aerodynamic Performance of Compressor Cascade at Different Incidences[J]. Journal of Propulsion Technology, 2012, 33(3).
[17] 宋寅, 顾春伟. 叶片前缘形状对压气机气动性能的影响[J]. 工程热物理学报, 2013, 34(6): 1051-1054.(编辑:史亚红)　　　　　　　　　　　　　　收稿日期:2015-09-29；修订日期:2015-11-24。基金项目:国家自然基金重点项目(51236006)；陕西省自然科学基金(2014JM7248)。作者简介:高丽敏,女,博士,教授,研究领域为叶轮机械气动热力学。E-mail: gaolm@nwpu.edu.cn