三维超声速燃烧室凹腔构型的优化设计及参数分析

推进技术 ›› 2018, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (8): 1780-1789.

三维超声速燃烧室凹腔构型的优化设计及参数分析

朱美军¹,辜天来²,张帅¹,郑耀¹

浙江大学航空航天学院，浙江杭州 310027,中国运载火箭技术研究院研究发展中心，北京 100076,浙江大学航空航天学院，浙江杭州 310027,浙江大学航空航天学院，浙江杭州 310027

发布日期:2021-08-15
作者简介:朱美军，女，博士生，研究领域为超燃冲压发动机内流道设计与优化。E-mail: zhumeijun@zju.edu.cn 通讯作者:张帅，男，博士，副教授，研究领域为超燃冲压发动机内流道设计与优化。

Optimization and Parameter Analysis of Cavity in aThree-Dimensional Supersonic Combustor

School of Aeronautics and Astronautics，Zhejiang University，Hangzhou 310027，China,R&D Center，China Academy of Launch Vehicle Technology，Beijing 100076，China,School of Aeronautics and Astronautics，Zhejiang University，Hangzhou 310027，China and School of Aeronautics and Astronautics，Zhejiang University，Hangzhou 310027，China

Published:2021-08-15

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 凹腔构型对超声速燃烧室的燃烧效率、阻力特性、火焰稳定等性能都有重要的影响，且凹腔构型各参数变化产生的影响存在复杂的耦合作用。因此，针对横向喷射燃料的三维超声速燃烧室凹腔构型进行了基于代理模型的优化设计及参数分析研究。首先对凹腔的长度、深度和后壁倾角进行正交试验设计，数值仿真用以对凹腔燃烧室进行流场与性能分析，建立燃烧室燃烧效率和总压恢复系数与设计变量间的代理模型，根据基于替代模型的复杂系统优化策略，采用带精英策略的非支配排序遗传算法(NSGA-Ⅱ)对凹腔构型进行二次优化设计，得到Pareto前沿面。结果分析表明，优化凹腔构型可分为窄深型、浅长型和中深中长型，分别对应Pareto前沿面的急变段、平缓段和巨变段；凹腔燃烧室的燃烧效率与凹腔长度呈负相关，与凹腔深度呈正相关，总压恢复系数反之；后壁倾角对总压恢复系数和燃烧效率影响均较小。平缓区的燃烧室压力幅度变化小且总压恢复系数高，其长深比在2.67～8，在不需要极高的燃烧效率情况下，可以优先选择平缓区凹腔构型。

关键词: 超声速燃烧室；凹腔构型；代理模型；优化

Abstract: The cavity has a great influence on the performance of supersonic combustors， such as combustion efficiency， drag characteristics and flame stability. The impact of the cavity parameter variation on the performance of combustors is complex coupled. A surrogate model based optimization and parameter analysis of the cavities in three-dimensional supersonic combustors with transverse fuel injection upstream were performed. The length， depth and sweepback angle of cavities were first designed by orthogonal experiment. Numerical simulations were applied to analyze the performance and flow fields of the test cases. Surrogate models of the combustion efficiency and total pressure recovery coefficient with the design variables were constructed. Based on the complex system optimization strategy， optimization of the cavity parameters were carried out twice to provide the Pareto front by the non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm (NSGA-Ⅱ). The results show that the optimal cavity configurations can be divided into narrow deep type， shallow long type and medium deep and long type， which correspond to rapid change section， gentle change section and extraordinary change section in the Pareto front. The combustion efficiency has a negative correlation with the length of cavities and a positive correlation with the depth of cavities. Whereas， the total pressure recovery coefficient has the opposite situations. Both combustion efficiency and total pressure recovery coefficient have few positive correlations with the sweepback angle. The combustors in the gentle change section have more uniform pressure distribution and higher total pressure recovery coefficient， which should be preferred when there is no need of high combustion efficiency. The length-to-depth ratio of the cavities in this section is about 2.67 to 8.

Key words: Supersonic combustors；Cavity configuration；Surrogate models；Optimization

朱美军,辜天来,张帅,郑耀. 三维超声速燃烧室凹腔构型的优化设计及参数分析[J]. 推进技术, 2018, 39(8): 1780-1789.

ZHU Mei-jun¹,GU Tian-lai²,ZHANG Shuai¹,ZHENG Yao¹. Optimization and Parameter Analysis of Cavity in aThree-Dimensional Supersonic Combustor[J]. Journal of Propulsion Technology, 2018, 39(8): 1780-1789.

参考文献

[1] Zang A, Tempel T, Yu K, et al. Experimental Characterization of Cavity-Augmented Supersonic Mixing[C]. Nevada: 43rd AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, 2005.
[2] Mathur T, Gruber M, Jackson K, et al. Supersonic Combustion Experiments with a Cavity-Based Fuel Injector[J]. Journal of Propulsion and Power, 2001, 17 (6):1305-1312.
[3] Ben-Yakar A, Hanson R K. Cavity Flame-Holders for Ignition and Flame Stabilization in Scramjets: an Overview [J]. Journal of Propulsion and Power, 2001, 17 (4):869-877.
[4] Gruber M, Baurle R, Mathur T, et al. Fundamental Studies of Cavity-Based Flameholder Concepts for Supersonic Combustors[J]. Journal of Propulsion and Power, 2001, 17 (1):146-153.
[5] Yu K H, Wilson K J, Schadow K C. Effect of Flame-Holding Cavities on Supersonic-Combustion Performance [J]. Journal of Propulsion and Power, 2001, 17 (6): 1287-1295.
[6] Gruber M, Baurle R, Mathur T, et al. Fundamental Studies of Cavity-Based Flameholder Concepts for Supersonic Combustors[J]. Journal of Propulsion and Power, 2001, 17 (1):146-153.
[7] Kim K M, Baek S W, Han C Y. Numerical Study on Supersonic Combustion with Cavity-Based Fuel Injection [J]. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 2004, 47 (2): 271-286.
[8] 耿辉, 周进, 翟振辰, 等. 凹腔结构对超声速燃烧室中横向燃料喷流流动与燃烧的影响[J]. 推进技术, 2007, 28(6): 599-606. (GENG Hui, ZHOU Jin, ZHAI Zhen-chen, et al. Influence of Cavity Geometry on Flow and Combustion of Transverse Fuel Jets in a Supersonic Combustor[J]. Journal of Propulsion Technology, 2007, 28(6): 599-606.)
[9] Cai Z, Yang Y, Sun M, et al. Experimental Investigation on Ignition Schemes of a Supersonic Combustor with the Rearwall-Expansion Cavity[J]. Acta Astronautica,2016, 123: 181-187.
[10] Cai Z, Wang Z, Sun M, et al. Effect of Combustor Geometry and Fuel Injection Scheme on the Combustion Process in a Supersonic Flow[J]. Acta Astronautica,2016, 129: 44-51.
[11] Bao H, Zhou J, Pan Y. Effect of Cavity Configuration on Kerosene Spark Ignition in a Scramjet Combustor at Ma4.5 Flight Condition[J]. Acta Astronautica, 2015, 117: 368-375.
[12] Huang W, Liu J, Yan L, et al. Multiobjective Design Optimization of the Performance for the Cavity Flameholder in Supersonic Flows[J]. Aerospace Science and Technology, 2013, 30(1): 246-54.
[13] Huang W, Pourkashanian M, Ma L, et al. Effect of Geometric Parameters on the Drag of the Cavity Flameholder Based on the Variance Analysis Method[J]. Aerospace Science and Technology, 2012, 21(1): 24-30.
[14] 黄伟, 雷静. 凹腔结构对圆形超燃冲压发动机燃烧室阻力特性影响[J]. 固体火箭技术, 2011, 34(1):52-56.
[15] Smart M, Ruf E. Free-Jet Testing of a REST Scramjet at Off-Design Conditions[C]. California: 25th AIAA Aerodynamic Measurement Technology and Ground Testing Conference, 2006.
[16] Heiser W H, Pratt D T. Hypersonic Airbreathing Propulsion[M]. Washington, DC: AIAA Education Series, 1994.
[17] Malo-Molina F J. Numerical Study of Innovative Scramjet Inlets Coupled to Combustors Using Hydrocarbon-Air Mixture[M]. Atlanta: Georgia Institute of Technology, 2010.
[18] Segal C. The Scramjet Engine: Processes and Characteristics[M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009.
[19] Hasselbrink E F, Mungal M. Transverse Jets and Jet Flames, Part 1: Scaling Laws for Strong Transverse Jets [J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 2001, 443(443): 1-25.
[20] Manual F. Manual and User Guide of Fluent Software [M]. Lebanon: Fluent, Inc, 2005.
[21] Horstman C, Settles G, Williams D, et al. A Reattaching Free Shear Layer in Compressible Turbulent Flow [J]. AIAA Journal, 1982, 20 (1): 79-85.
[22] Settles G, Williams D, Baca B, et al. Reattachment of a Compressible Turbulent Free Shear Layer[J]. AIAA Journal, 1982, 20(1): 60-67.
[23] Aso S, Kawai M, Ando Y. Experimental Study on Mixing Phenomena in Supersonic Flows with Slot Injection [C]. Nevada: 29th Aerospace Sciences Meeting, 1991.
[24] 耿辉. 超声速燃烧室中凹腔上游横向喷注燃料的流动, 混合与燃烧特性研究[D]. 长沙:国防科技大学, 2007.
[25] Jeong S, Murayama M, Yamamoto K. Efficient Optimization Design Method Using Kriging Model[J]. Journal of Aircraft, 2005, 42 (2): 413-420.
[26] Deb K, Pratap A, Agarwal S, et al. A Fast and Elitist Multiobjective Genetic Algorithm: NSGA-2[J]. Evolutionary Computation, 2002, 6(2): 182-197.
[27] Huang W, Wang Z G, Ingham D B, et al. Design Exploration for a Single Expansion Ramp Nozzle (SERN) Using Data Mining[J]. Acta Astronautica, 2013, 83:10-17.
[28] Huang W, Yang J, Yan L. Multi-Objective Design Optimization of the Transverse Gaseous Jet in Supersonic Flows [J]. Acta Astronautica, 2014, 93: 13-22.(编辑:梅瑛)　　　　　　　　　　　　　*　收稿日期:2017-07-17；修订日期:2017-08-29。作者简介:朱美军,女,博士生,研究领域为超燃冲压发动机内流道设计与优化。E-mail: zhumeijun@zju.edu.cn通讯作者:张帅,男,博士,副教授,研究领域为超燃冲压发动机内流道设计与优化。E-mail: shuaizhang@zju.edu.cn