Progress of Shock Wave/Boundary Layer Interactionand Its Control in Inlet

doi:10.13675/j.cnki.tjjs.190376

Journal of Propulsion Technology ›› 2020, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (2): 241-259.DOI: 10.13675/j.cnki.tjjs.190376

• Review • Next Articles

Progress of Shock Wave/Boundary Layer Interactionand Its Control in Inlet

Jiangsu Province Key Laboratory of Aerospace Power System,College of Energy and Power Engineering, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Nanjing 210016, China

Published:2021-08-15

进气道内激波 /边界层干扰及控制研究进展

张悦¹,谭慧俊¹,王子运¹,李鑫¹,郭赟杰¹

南京航空航天大学能源与动力学院，江苏省航空动力系统重点实验室，江苏南京 210016

作者简介:张悦，博士，副教授，研究领域为内流空气动力学。E-mail： y.zhang@nuaa.edu.cn
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金（11532007；51806102）；中国博士后科学基金（2016M600412）；江苏省高校优势学科建设工程资助项目。

Abstract

Abstract: Inlet is an important aerodynamic component of a high speed aeronautical and aerospace vehicle. The aerodynamic performance, weight and stealth performance of the vehicle is largely dictated by the inlet. Shock/boundary layer interaction is a common phenomenon in a high speed inlet and plays an important role in the inlet performance. The shock/boundary layer interaction in inlets can be classified into normal shock/boundary layer interaction, oblique shock/boundary layer interaction and three-dimensional shock/boundary layer interaction. Due to the effects of sidewall and complex background waves, the shock/boundary layer interaction in the inlet embodies significant three-dimensional character and remarkable coupling effect which make its prediction go beyond the scope of current shock/boundary layer interaction theory. A brief summary on related research of shock/boundary layer interaction and its control methods in high speed inlets was given.

Key words: Inlet;Shock wave;Boundary layer interaction;Flow control

摘要： 进气道作为高速航空航天飞行器的重要气动部件，对飞行器的气动力特性、结构重量、隐身性能等有显著影响。激波/边界层干扰现象是高速进气道内普遍存在的一类流动现象，对进气道的性能有突出的影响。发生于进气道内的激波/边界层干扰现象主要可分为正激波/边界层干扰、斜激波/边界层干扰以及三维激波/边界层干扰几类，由于受到侧壁壁面和进气道内背景波系的影响，这些干扰现象偏离了传统基于简化模型的研究结果，具有显著的耦合干扰特征，干扰区间内三维特征明显。概述了发生于进气道内的激波/边界层干扰特性及相关研究进展，并对目前进气道内激波/边界层干扰现象的控制方法进行了总结。

关键词: 进气道;激波;边界层干扰;流动控制

ZHANG Yue¹,TAN Hui-jun¹,WANG Zi-yun¹,LI Xin¹,GUO Yun-jie¹. Progress of Shock Wave/Boundary Layer Interactionand Its Control in Inlet[J]. Journal of Propulsion Technology, 2020, 41(2): 241-259.

张悦,谭慧俊,王子运,李鑫,郭赟杰. 进气道内激波 /边界层干扰及控制研究进展[J]. 推进技术, 2020, 41(2): 241-259.

References

[1] Seddon J , Goldsmith E L . Intake Aerodynamics (Second Edition) [M]. Reston: AIAA Education Series， 1999.
[2] 刘大响 . 航空发动机设计手册—第7册进排气装置[M]. 北京：航空工业出版社， 2000.
[3] Thomas G H ， Dutton J G ， Gregory S E . Surface Flow Visualization and Pressure Sensitive Paint Measurements in the Large-Scale Low-Boom Inlet [J]. Journal of Propulsion and Power， 2012， 28( 6): 1243- 1256.
[4] Dave S ， John S ， Vance D ， et al . TBCC Inlet Experiments and Analysis[R]. NASA-TM-2008-6598 .
[5] Carroll B F ， Duttont J C . An LDV Investigation of a Multiple Normal Shock Wave/Turbulent Boundary Layer Interaction [R]. AIAA 89- 0355.
[6] Souverein L J ， Oudheusden B W ， Scarano F ， et al . Unsteadiness Characterization in a Shock Wave Turbulent Boundary Layer Interaction through Dual-PIV[R]. AIAA 2008- 4169.
[7] Poggie J ， Erbland P J ， Smits A J ， et al . Quantitative Visualization of Compressible Turbulent Shear Flows Using Condensate-Enhanced Rayleigh Scattering [J]. Experiments in Fluids， 2004， 37( 3): 438– 454.
[8] 易仕和，田立丰，赵玉新，等 . 基于 NPLS 技术的可压缩湍流机理实验研究新进展[J]. 力学进展， 2011， 41 ( 4)： 379- 390.
[9] Ferri A . Experimental Results with Airfoils Tested in the High-Speed Tunnel at Guidonia[R]. California: Technical Report Archive & Image Library， 1940.
[10] Seddon J . The Flow Produced by Interaction of a Turbulent Boundary Layer with a Normal Shock Wave of Strength Sufficient to Cause Separation [M]. London: Her Majesty’s Stationery Office， 1967.
[11] Matsuo K ， Miyazato Y ， Kim H D . Shock Train and Pseudo-Shock Phenomena in Internal Gas Flows [J]. Progress in Aerospace Sicence， 1999， 35( 1): 33- 100.
[12] Pirozzoli S ， Bernardini M ， Grasso F . Direct Numerical Simulation of Transonic Shock/Boundary Layer Interaction under Conditions of Incipient Separation [J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics， 2010， 657: 361- 393.
[13] Sirieix M ， Delery J ， Stanewsky E . High-Reynolds Number Boundary-Layer Shock-Wave Interaction in Transonic Flow [M]. Berlin: Springer， 1981.
[14] Delery J ， Marvin J G ， Reshotko E . Shock-Wave Boundary Layer Interactions[R]. AGARD-AG-280， 1986.
[15] Sirieix M ， Delery J ， Stanewsky E . High-Reynolds Number Boundary-Layer Shock-Wave Interaction in Transonic Flow[M]. Berlin: Springer， 1981.
[16] Vidal R ， Wittliff C ， Catlin P ， et al . Reynolds Number Effects on the Shock Wave-Turbulent Boundary Layer Interaction at Transonic Speeds[R]. AIAA 1973- 661.
[17] Babinsky H ， John K . Shock Wave Boundary Layer Interactions[M]. London: Cambridge University Press， 2011.
[18] Doerffer P ， Dallmann U . Reynolds Number Effect on Separation Structures at Normal Shock Wave/Turbulent Boundary-Layer Interaction[J]. AIAA Journal， 1989， 27( 9): 1206- 1212.
[19] Padova C ， Falk T ， Wittliff C . Experimental Investigation of Similitude Parameters Governing Transonic Shock-Boundary Layer Interactions[C]. Pasadena: 18th Aerospace Sciences Meeting， 1980.
[20] Schofield W H . Interaction of a Turbulent Boundary Layer with a Normal Shock Wave Followed by an Adverse Pressure Gradient[R]. Victoria: Aeronautical Research Labs Melbourne， 1983.
[21] Tan H J ， Sun S ， Huang H X . Behavior of Shock Trains in a Hypersonic Inlet/Isolator Model with Complex Background Waves [J]. Experiments in Fluids， 2012， 53( 6): 1647- 1661.
[22] Sajben M ， Morris M J ， Bogar T J ， et al . Confined Normal-Shock/Turbulent-Boundary-Layer Interaction Followed by an Adverse Pressure Gradient[J]. AIAA Journal， 1991， 29( 12): 2115- 2123.
[23] Blosch E ， Carroll B F ， Morris M J . Numerical Simulation of Confined Transonic Normal Shock Wave/Turbulent Boundary-Layer Interactions[J]. AIAA Journal， 1993， 31( 12): 2241- 2246.
[24] Loth E ， Titchener N ， Babinsky H ， et al . Canonical Normal Shock Wave/Boundary-Layer Interaction Flows Relevant to External Compression Inlets[J]. AIAA Journal， 2013， 51( 9): 2208- 2217.
[25] Titchener N ， Babinsky H . Micro-Vortex Generators Applied to a Flow-Field Containing a Normal Shock-Wave and Diffuser[C]. Orlando: 48th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting Including the New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition, 2010.
[26] Titchener N ， Babinsky H . Microvortex Generators Applied to a Flowfield Containing a Normal Shock Wave and Diffuser [J]. AIAA Journal， 2011， 49( 5): 1046- 1056.
[27] Rybalko M ， Babinsky H ， Loth E . Vortex Generators for a Normal Shock/Boundary Layer Interaction with a Downstream Diffuser [J]. Journal of Propulsion and Power， 2012， 28( 1): 71- 82.
[28] Titchener N ， Bruce P ， Babinsky H . An Experimental Investigation of Corner Bleed Applied to a Normal Shock-Wave/Boundary-Layer Interaction and Diffuser[C]. Orlando: 49th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting Including the New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition， 2011.
[29] Titchener N ， Babinsky H . Control of a Shock-Wave/Boundary-Layer Interaction and Subsequent Subsonic Diffuser Using a Combination of Vortex Generators and Bleed[C]. Nashville: 50th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting Including the New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition， 2012.
[30] Titchener N ， Babinsky H . Shock Wave/Boundary-Layer Interaction Control Using a Combination of Vortex Generators and Bleed[J]. AIAA Journal， 2013， 51( 5): 1221- 1233.
[31] Handa T ， Masuda M ， Matsuo K . Three-Dimensional Normal Shock-Wave/Boundary-Layer Interaction in a Rectangular Duct[J]. AIAA Journal， 2005， 43( 10): 2182- 2187.
[32] Bruce P J K ， Burton D M F ， Titchener N A ， et al . Corner Effect and Separation in Transonic Channel Flows [J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics， 2011， 679: 247- 262.
[33] Burton D M F ， Babinsky H . Corner Separation Effects for Normal Shock Wave/Turbulent Boundary Layer Interactions in Rectangular Channels[J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics， 2012， 707: 287- 306.
[34] Pizzella M P ， Warning S ， Jennerjohn M ， et al . Numerical Investigation of a Normal Shock Wave Boundary Layer Interaction in a 4.3 Aspect Ratio Test Section [C]. San Diego: 54th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting， 2016.
[35] Pizzella M P ， Warning S ， McQuilling M W ， et al . On the Effect of Test Section Aspect Ratio for Shock Wave-Boundary Layer Interactions[C]. Grapevine: 55th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting, 2017.
[36] Pizzella M ， Warning S ， Jennerjohn M ， et al . Shock-Wave/Boundary-Layer Interaction in a Large-Aspect-Ratio Test Section[J]. AIAA Journal， 2017， 55( 9): 2919- 2928.
[37] Delery J M . Shock Wave/Turbulent Boundary Layer Interaction and Its Control[J]. Progress in Aerospace Sciences， 1985， 22( 4): 209- 280.
[38] Dolling， David S . Fifty Years of Shock-Wave/Boundary-Layer Interaction Research: What Next? [J]. AIAA Journal， 2001， 39( 8): 1517- 1531.
[39] Delery J ， Dussauge J P . Some Physical Aspects of Shock Wave/Boundary Layer Interactions[J]. Shock Waves， 2009， 19( 6): 453- 468.
[40] Chew Y T . Shock Wave and Boundary Layer Interaction in the Presence of an Expansion Corner[J]. Aeronautical Quarterly， 1979， 30( 3): 506- 527.
[41] Chung K M ， Lu F K . Hypersonic Turbulent Expansion-Corner Flow with Shock Impingement[J]. Journal of Propulsion and Power， 1995， 11( 3): 441- 447.
[42] Hawbold R J ， Sullivan P A ， Gottlieb J . Interactions Between Shock Wave and Hypersonic Laminar Boundary Layer near Convex Corner [J]. Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets， 1995， 32( 5): 783- 790.
[43] Sathianarayanan A ， Verma S B . Experimental Investigation of an Incident Shock-Induced Interaction near an Expansion Corner[J]. Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets， 2017， 54( 3): 769- 773.
[44] Zhang Yue ， Tan Hui-jun ， Zhuang Yi ， et al . Influence of Expansion Waves on Cowl Shock/Boundary Layer Interaction in Hypersonic Inlets[J]. Journal of Propulsion and Power， 2014， 30( 5): 1183- 1191.
[45] Zhang Yue ， Tan Hui-jun ， Tian Fang-chao ， et al . Control of Incident Shock/Boundary Layer Interaction by a Two-Dimensional Bump[J]. AIAA Journal， 2014， 52( 4): 767- 776.
[46] Wang B ， Sandham N ， Hu Z ， et al . Numerical Study of Oblique Shock-Wave/Boundary-Layer Interaction Considering Sidewall Effects[J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics， 2015， 767: 526- 561.
[47] Huang H X ， Tan H J ， Sun S ， et al . Evolution of Supersonic Corner Vortex in a Hypersonic Inlet/Isolator Model[J]. Physics of Fluids， 2016， 28( 12).
[48] He L ， Yi S H ， Zhao Y X ， et al . Visualization of Coherent Structures in a Supersonic Flat-Plate Boundary Layer [J]. Chinese Sci Bull， 2011， 56: 489- 494.
[49] He L ， Yi S H ， Zhao Y X ， et al . Experimental Study of a Supersonic Turbulent Boundary Layer Using PIV[J]. Science China (Physics， Mechanics & Astronomy)， 2011， 54( 9): 1702- 1709.
[50] Zhuang Y ， Tan H J ， Liu Y Z ， et al . High Resolution Visualization of G?rtler-Like Vortices in Supersonic Compression Ramp Flow[J]. Journal of Visualization， 2017， 20( 3): 505- 508.
[51] Zhuang Y ， Tan H ， Li X ， et al . G?rtler-Like Vortices in an Impinging Shock Wave/Turbulent Boundary Layer Interaction Flow[J]. Physics of Fluids， 2018， 30( 6).
[52] Zhuang Y ， Tan H ， Li X ， et al . Evolution of Coherent Vortical Structures in a Shock Wave/Turbulent Boundary-Layer Interaction Flow[J]. Physics of Fluids， 2018， 30( 11).
[53] Mahapatra D ， Jagadeesh G . Studies on Unsteady Shock Interactions near a Generic Scramjet Inlet[J]. AIAA Journal， 2009， 47( 9): 2223- 2232.
[54] Bachchan N ， Hillier R . Hypersonic Inlet Flow Analysis at Off-Design Conditions[R]. AIAA 2004- 5380.
[55] Boon S ， Hillier R . Hypersonic Inlet Flow Analysis at Mach 5， 6， and 7 [R]. AIAA 2006- 0012.
[56] Boon S ， Hillier R . Mach 6 Hypersonic Inlet Flow Analysis at Incidence [R]. AIAA 2006- 3036.
[57] TAO Yuan ， FAN Xiaoqiang ， ZHAO Yilong . Viscous Effects of Shock Reflection Hysteresis in Steady Super-Sonic Flows[J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics， 2014， 759: 134- 148.
[58] Jiao Xiaoliang ， Chang Juntao ， Wang Zhongqi ， et al . Mechanism Study on Local Unstart of Hypersonic Inlet at High Mach Number [J]. AIAA Journal， 2015， 53( 10): 3102- 3112.
[59] Token K H . Heat Transfer Due to Shock Wave/Turbulent Boundary Layer Interactions on High Speed Weapon Systems[R]. AFFDL TR-74-77， 1974.
[60] Kubota H ， Stollery J L . An Experimental Study of the Interaction Between a Glancing Shock Wave and a Turbulent Boundary Layer[J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics， 1982， 116: 431- 458.
[61] Arora Nishul ， Ali Mohd Y ， Yang Zhang ， et al . Shock-Boundary Layer Interaction Due to a Sharp Unswept Fin in a Mach 2 Flow[J]. AIAA Journal， 2015， 53( 4): 1579- 1593.
[62] Arora Nishul ， Ali Mohd Y. ， Yang Zhang ， et al . Flowfield Measurements in a Mach 2 Fin-Generated Shock/Boundary-Layer Interaction [J]. AIAA Journal， 2018， 56( 10): 3963- 3974.
[63] Sheng Fa-jia ， Tan Hui-jun ， Zhuang Yi ， et al . Visualization of Conical Vortex and Shock in Swept Shock/Turbulent Boundary Layer Interaction Flow[J]. Journal of Visualization， 2018， 21: 909- 914.
[64] 盛发家，谭慧俊，黄河峡，等 . 连续双扫掠激波/湍流边界层干扰流动特性研究[J]. 推进技术， 2019， 40( 5): 435- 443.
[65] 王娇，谭慧俊，黄河峡 . Bump进气道中鼓包诱导的激波/边界层干扰特性[J]. 航空动力学报， 2018， 33( 1)： 97- 107.
[66] 王娇，谭慧俊，黄河峡 . 不同波系配置的鼓包压缩面引起的激波/边界层干扰特性[J]. 航空动力学报， 2018， 33( 2)： 372- 382.
[67] 刘亚洲，谭慧俊，黄河峡，等 . 不同波系配置的鼓包压缩面流动特性实验研究[J]. 推进技术， 2019， 40（ 8
[68] 谭慧俊，李程鸿，张悦，等 . 固定壁面激波控制技术的研究进展[J]. 推进技术， 2016， 37( 11): 2001- 2008.
[69] Schulte D ， Henckels A ， Neubacher R . Manipulation of Shock/Boundary-Layer Interactions in Hypersonic Inlets [J]. Journal of Propulsion and Power， 2001， 17( 3): 585- 590.
[70] John S . Improvements in Modeling 90-Degree Bleed Holes for Supersonic Inlets[J]. Journal of Propulsion and Power， 2012， 28( 4): 773- 781.
[71] Michael K S ， Neal E H ， Allan P . Data Analysis of the HyShot 2 Scramjet Flight Experiment[J]. AIAA Journal， 2006， 44( 10): 2366- 2375.
[72] Reddy D R . Computation of Crossing Glancing Shocks-Turbulent Boundary Layer Interaction with Bleed[R]. AIAA 98- 0958.
[73] Schulte D ， Henckels A ， Wepler U . Reduction of Shock Induced Boundary Layer Separation in Hypersonic Inlets using Bleed[J]. Aerospace Science and Technology， 1998， 2( 4): 231- 239.
[74] H?berle J ， Gülhan A . Internal Flowfield Investigation of a Hypersonic Inlet at Mach 6 with Bleed[J]. Journal of Propulsion and Power， 2007， 23( 5): 1007- 1017.
[75] Boyce R R ， Paull A . Scramjet Intake and Exhaust CFD Studies for the HyShot Scramjet Flight Experiment [R]. AIAA 2001- 1891.
[76] Lin J C . Review of Research on Low-Profile Vortex Generators to Control Boundary-Layer Separation[J]. Progress in Aerospace Sciences， 2002， 38( 4): 389- 420.
[77] Anderson B H ， Tinapple J ， Surber L . Optimal Control of Shock Wave Turbulent Boundary Layer Interactions Using Micro-Array Actuation [R]. AIAA 2006- 3197.
[78] Charles W ， Ford P ， Babinsky H . Micro-Ramp Control for Oblique Shock Wave/Boundary Layer Interactions [R]. AIAA 2007- 4115.
[79] Blinde P L ， Humble R A ， Oudheusden B W ， et al . Effects of Micro-Ramps on a Shock Wave/Turbulent Boundary Layer Interaction[J]. Shock Wave， 2009， 19( 6): 507- 520.
[80] Shinn A F ， Vanka S P . Application of BCFD Unstructured Grid Solver to Simulation of Micro-Ramp Control of Shock/Boundary Layer Interactions[R]. AIAA 2007- 3914.
[81] Zhang Y ， Tan H J ， Du M C ， et al . Control of Shock/Boundary-Layer Interaction for Hypersonic Inlets by Highly Swept Microramps[J]. Journal of Propulsion and Power， 2015， 31( 1): 133- 143.
[82] 张悦，高婉宁，程代姝 . 基于记忆合金的可变形涡流发生器控制唇罩激波/边界层干扰研究[J]. 推进技术， 2018， 39( 12): 2755- 2763.
[83] Bruce P J K ， Colliss S P . Review of Research into Shock Control Bumps[J]. Shock Waves， 2015， 25( 5): 451- 471.
[84] 张悦，谭慧俊，张启帆，等 . 一种进气道内激波/边界层干扰控制的新方法及其流动机理[J]. 宇航学报， 2012， 33( 2): 265- 273.
[85] Zhang Y ， Tan H J ， Tian F C ， et al . Control of Incident Shock/Boundary-Layer Interaction by a Two-Dimensional Bump [J]. AIAA Journal， 2014， 52( 4): 767- 776.
[86] Zhang Y ， Tan H J ， Sun S ， et al . Control of Cowl Shock/Boundary-Layer Interaction in Hypersonic Inlets by Bump [J]. AIAA Journal， 2015， 53( 11): 3492- 3496.
[87] Zhang Y ， Tan H J ， Li J F ， et al . Control of Cowl-Shock/Boundary-Layer Interactions by Deformable Shape-Memory Alloy Bump [J]. AIAA Journal， 2018， 56( 2): 1- 10.
[88] Grossman K R ， Cybyk B Z ， Vanwie D M . Sparkjet Actuators for Flow Control [C]. Reno: 41th Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit， 2003.
[89] Wang J J ， Choi K S ， Feng L H ， et al . Recent Developments in DBD Plasma Flow Control [J]. Progress in Aerospace Sciences， 2013， 62( 4): 52- 78.
[90] Corke T C ， Enloe C L ， Wilkinson S P . Dielectric Barrier Discharge Plasma Actuators for Flow Control[J]. Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics， 2010， 42( 1): 505- 529.
[91] Leonov S B ， Yarantsev D ， Firsov A ， et al . Plasma Control of SW Configuration in M=2 Inlet at Off-Design Mode [C]. San Diego: 43rd Fluid Dynamics Conference， 2013.
[92] Thomas E , Ali M Y , Foster C ， et al . SparkJet Actuator Characterization in Supersonic Crossflow[C]. USA: 6th AIAA Flow Control Conference， 2012.
[93] Zhang Yu-chao ， Tan Hui-jun ， Huang He-xia ， et al . Transient Flow Patterns of Multiple Plasma Synthetic Jets under Different Ambient Pressures[J]. Flow Turbulence Combustion， 2018， 6: 1- 17.
[94] Laurendeau F ， Chedevergne F ， Léon O . PIV and Electric Characterization of a Plasma Synthetic Jet Actuator [C]. Dallas: AIAA Fluid Dynamics Conference, 2013.
[95] Narayanaswamy V ， Raja L L ， Clemens N T . Control of a Shock/Boundary-Layer Interaction by Using a Pulsed-Plasma Jet Actuator[J]. AIAA Journal， 2012， 50( 1): 246- 249.
[96] Huang He-Xia ， Tan Hui-Jun ， Sun Shu ， et al . Transient Interaction Between Plasma Jet and Supersonic Compression Ramp Flow[J]. Physics of Fluids， 2018， 30（ 4）.

Progress of Shock Wave/Boundary Layer Interactionand Its Control in Inlet

进气道内激波 /边界层干扰及控制研究进展

PDF

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

References

Related Articles 0

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments