Study of One-Dimensional Averaging Methods in Scramjet

Journal of Propulsion Technology ›› 2014, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (7): 865-873.

School of Astronautics，Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics，Beijing 100191，China;China Gas Turbine Establishment，Chengdu 610500，China;School of Astronautics，Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics，Beijing 100191，China;School of Astronautics，Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics，Beijing 100191，China;School of Astronautics，Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics，Beijing 100191，China

Published:2021-08-15

超燃冲压发动机流场一维平均方法研究

张　旭¹,姜　军²,林言中¹,陈　兵¹,徐　旭¹

北京航空航天大学宇航学院，北京 100191;中国燃气涡轮研究院，四川成都 610500;北京航空航天大学宇航学院，北京 100191;北京航空航天大学宇航学院，北京 100191;北京航空航天大学宇航学院，北京 100191

作者简介:张　旭(1990—)，男，硕士生，研究领域为超燃冲压发动机技术。

Abstract

Abstract: Various averaging methods were introduced，including common mass or area weighted averaging method，including the conserved mass/momentum/energy (CMME) method and the conserved mass /energy/entropy (CMES) method. A model containing scramjet inlet and combustor was used to reveal the difference between different averaging methods，and effects of entrance data from different averaging methods on combustor one-dimensional analysis. Results show that the conserved methods are recommended when dealing with scramjet combustor. The CMME method can conserve accurate total pressure，while the CMES method will cause virtual total pressure loss，so the CMME method is recommended in dealing with total pressure recovery. In subsonic combustion mode，both conserved methods cannot predict the gradual compression in isolator. In supersonic combustion mode，the CMES method can hold better approximate conservation of momentum，which is worse in subsonic combustion mode. Combustor one-dimensional analysis results of entrance data from different averaging methods are compared. Derivation of Case 1 result by mass weighted averaging method is up to 27.8%，which by the conserved methods are only about 13%. Derivation of Case 2 result by mass weighted averaging method is up to 14.9%，which by the conserved methods is only about 5%. Results all show some deviation with equivalent one-dimensional result of multi-dimensional flow field，but the CMME and CMES methods fit better，and its computed thrusts are more reliable.

Key words: Scramjet；One-dimensional averaging method；Area weighted averaging；Mass weighted averaging；CMME method；CMES method

摘要： 介绍了多种平均方法，包括常用的流量或面积加权平均方法，以及CMME(流量/动量/能量守恒)方法和CMES(动量/能量/熵守恒)方法。以超燃冲压发动机进气道-燃烧室构型为对象，研究了不同平均方法得到的等效一维结果差异，以及不同平均方法的入口参数对超燃燃烧室一维计算结果的影响。结果表明:在超燃燃烧室多维热态仿真数据分析时，推荐使用通量守恒方法；CMES方法能准确的保留总压信息，CMME方法得到的总压损失会大于实际，在处理总压恢复性能时，CMES方法更优；亚燃模态时，CMME方法和CMES方法均不能反映隔离段激波串的渐变压缩；超燃模态时，CMES方法能较好地保持动量的近似守恒，在亚燃模态则较差；不同平均方法得到燃烧室入口参数的一维计算结果与三维流场等效一维沿程静压分布均存在一定偏差，Case1流量加权平均解误差高达27.8%，通量守恒解误差仅约13%，Case2流量加权平均解误差为14.9%，通量守恒解误差仅约5%，说明CMME方法与CMES方法符合程度更高，推力计算结果更为可信。

关键词: 超燃冲压发动机；一维平均方法；面积加权平均；流量加权平均；流量/动量/能量守恒方法；动量/能量/熵守恒方法

ZHANG Xu¹,JIANG Jun²,LIN Yan-zhong¹,CHEN Bing¹,XU Xu¹. Study of One-Dimensional Averaging Methods in Scramjet[J]. Journal of Propulsion Technology, 2014, 35(7): 865-873.

张　旭,姜　军,林言中,陈　兵,徐　旭. 超燃冲压发动机流场一维平均方法研究[J]. 推进技术, 2014, 35(7): 865-873.

References

[1] Hideo Ikawa. Rapid Methodology for Design and Performance Prediction of Integrated Supersonic Combustion Ramjet Engine [J]. Journal of Propulsion and Power, 1991, 7(3): 437-444.
[2] 姜军, 初敏, 徐旭. 双模态超燃燃烧室性能准一维计算方法 [J].推进技术, 2013,34(6).(JIANG Jun, CHU Ming, XU Xu.A Quasi-One-Dimensional Method for Prediction of Dual Mode Scramjet Combustor Performance [J]. Journal of Propulsion Technology, 2013,34(6).)
[3] William H Heiser, David T Pratt. Hypersonic Air-Breathing Propulsion[M]. Washington D C: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 1994.
[4] 王兰, 邢建文, 郑忠华, 等. 超燃冲压发动机内流性能的一维评估 [J].推进技术, 2008, 29(6).(WANG Lan, XING Jian-wen, ZHEN Zhong-hua, A Preliminary Study on Hypersonic Airbreathing Engine Performance [J]. Journal of Propulsion Technology, 2008, 29(6).)
[5] 王元光, 徐旭, 蔡国飙. 超燃冲压发动机燃烧室设计计算方法的研究 [J].北京航空航天大学学报, 2005, 31(1).
[6] Cristian Birzer, Con J Doolan.Quasi-One-Dimensional Model of Hydrogen-Fueled Scramjet Combustors [J]. Journal of Propulsion and Power, 2009, 25(6): 1220-1225.
[7] 周凯, 邢建文. 超燃冲压发动机燃烧室性能一维评估方法研究[C].绵阳:高超声速冲压发动机内外流耦合流动研讨会论文集, 2011.
[8] Maria V Pulsonetti, John Erdos, Kevin Early. An Engineering Model for Analysis of Scramjet Combustor Performance with Finite Rate Chemistry [R]. AIAA 88-3258.
[9] 张旭, 王利, 林言中, 等. 超燃冲压发动机一体化性能分析[J].推进技术, 2014, 35(2).(ZHANG Xu, WANG Li, LIN Yan-zhong, et al.Analysis of Three-Dimensional Scramjet Performance [J]. Journal of Propulsion Technology, 2014, 35(2).)
[10] XU Xu, XU Dajun, CAI Guobiao. Optimization Design for Scramjet and Analysis of Its Operation Performance [J]. Acta Astronautica, 2005,(57): 390-403.
[11] Livesey J L. Flow Property Averaging Methods for Compressible Internal Flows [R]. AIAA 82-0135.
[12] Baurle R A, Gaffney R L. Extraction of One-Dimensional Flow Properties from Multidimensional Data Sets [J].Journal of Propulsion and Power, 2008, 24(4): 704-714.
[13] 郭秉昌. 流体机械热力计算中的一维平均方法分析 [J].流体机械, 1994, 22(2):32-35.
[14] 叶中元. 高超冲压性能计算的疑难杂症及其诊断 [C]. 北京: 第四届冲压发动机技术交流会, 2013.
[15] 宁壮, 叶中元. 由非均匀气流得到一维平均参数的一种新方法 [C].北京: 第五届全国高超声速科学技术会议, 2012.(编辑:梅瑛)收稿日期:2013-07-03；修订日期:2013-09-25。作者简介:张旭(1990—),男,硕士生,研究领域为超燃冲压发动机技术。E-mail:withewind1@gmail.com