基于惯性补偿的三分量测力天平瞬态特性的研究

推进技术 ›› 2018, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (6): 1396-1405.

基于惯性补偿的三分量测力天平瞬态特性的研究

吕金洲^1,2,陈光雄¹,张小庆²,赵晓男¹,贺伟²

西南交通大学机械工程学院摩擦学研究所，四川成都 610000; 中国空气动力研究与发展中心超高速空气动力学研究所高超声速冲压发动机技术重点实验室，四川绵阳 621000,西南交通大学机械工程学院摩擦学研究所，四川成都 610000,中国空气动力研究与发展中心超高速空气动力学研究所高超声速冲压发动机技术重点实验室，四川绵阳 621000,西南交通大学机械工程学院摩擦学研究所，四川成都 610000,中国空气动力研究与发展中心超高速空气动力学研究所高超声速冲压发动机技术重点实验室，四川绵阳 621000

发布日期:2021-08-15
基金资助:
高超声速冲压发动机技术重点实验室基金(STS/MY-ZY-2015-007)。

Transient Characteristics Research of Three-Component Force Measurement Balance Based on Inertia Compensation

Tribology Research Institute，Mechanical Engineering School，Southwest Jiaotong University，Chengdu 610031，China;Science and Technology on Scramjet Laboratory，Hypervelocity Aerodynamics Institute CARDC，Mianyang 621000，China,Tribology Research Institute，Mechanical Engineering School，Southwest Jiaotong University，Chengdu 610031，China,Science and Technology on Scramjet Laboratory，Hypervelocity Aerodynamics Institute CARDC，Mianyang 621000，China,Tribology Research Institute，Mechanical Engineering School，Southwest Jiaotong University，Chengdu 610031，China and Science and Technology on Scramjet Laboratory，Hypervelocity Aerodynamics Institute CARDC，Mianyang 621000，China

Published:2021-08-15

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 高超声速一体化试验模型在脉冲燃烧风洞中进行测力试验时，模型振动导致天平无法准确测量模型所受到的气动力载荷。为研究脉冲风洞瞬态测力问题，采用了以下方法:根据测力天平的结构特点建立了动力学方程；对其进行了虚拟标定和模态分析；对测力天平进行了瞬态分析并对输出结果进行了惯性补偿。结果表明，单分量阶跃载荷加载时，补偿后输出结果超调量大大下降，振动衰减时间缩短，俯仰力矩会对轴向力输出产生干扰，且三分量阶跃载荷加载时，干扰降低，各分量的超调量分别为162.6N，574.4N和38N·m；单分量正弦加载时，加载分量上输入输出基本一致，俯仰力矩对轴向力的干扰作用仍然存在，3分量正弦载荷加载时，输入输出结果具有相同的周期特性，俯仰力矩结果与输入结果一致，轴向和法向输入输出间存在一定偏差，3分量的超调量分别为24.1N，375.7N和70.8N·m。

关键词: 测力天平；动力学建模；惯性补偿；瞬态分析

Abstract: The oscillation of the test model will greatly affect the measurement of aerodynamic load or moment， when the hypersonic integrated model tested in the impulse combustion wind tunnel. The following methods were used to solve the issue of transient force measurement. Firstly， the dynamic equation of the force balance was deduced according to its structural characteristic. Secondly， the virtual static calibration and modal analysis to this force balance were conducted. Thirdly， the transient analysis was conducted and the inertia compensation method was used. The result proved that the amplitudes of vibration reduced significantly and the attenuation time shortened sharply after the inertia compensation. And the axial output was disturbed by the pitching moment while the disturbance would be lowered when 3-component load and moment were applied. The amplitudes of each component were 162.6N， 574.4N， and 38N·m， respectively. The output of the force balance under single component sine load or moment was strictly accord with the input after the inertia compensation， although the axial disturbance under the pitching moment was still existed. Furthermore， the output and input embraced the same frequency and the transient output of the pitching moment was accord with the input， however， the axial and normal output loads had some difference with input when the balance under the action of 3-component sine load and moment. The maximums exceed the amplitudes of each component were 24.1N， 375.7N， and 70.8N·m， respectively.

Key words: Force balance；Dynamics modeling；Inertia compensation；Transient analysis

吕金洲,陈光雄,张小庆,赵晓男,贺伟. 基于惯性补偿的三分量测力天平瞬态特性的研究[J]. 推进技术, 2018, 39(6): 1396-1405.

LV Jin-zhou^1,2,CHEN Guang-xiong¹,ZHANG Xiao-qing²,ZHAO Xiao-nan¹,HE Wei². Transient Characteristics Research of Three-Component Force Measurement Balance Based on Inertia Compensation[J]. Journal of Propulsion Technology, 2018, 39(6): 1396-1405.

参考文献

[1] 乐嘉陵, 刘伟雄, 贺伟, 等. 脉冲燃烧风洞及其在火箭和超燃发动机研究中的应用[J]. 实验流体力学, 2005, 19(1): 1-10.
[2] 刘伟雄, 谭宇, 毛雄兵, 等. 一种新运行方式脉冲燃烧风洞研制及初步应用 [J]. 试验流体力学, 2007, 21(4): 59-64.
[3] Bertin J J, Cummings R M. Fifty Years of Hypersonic Where We’re Been, Where We’re Going [J]. Aerospace Sciences, 2003, 39: 511-536.
[4] 姜宗林, 余鸿儒. 高超声速激波风洞研究进展[J]. 力学进展, 2009, 39(6): 765-775.
[5] Tanno H, Kodera M, Komuro T, et al. Aerodynamic Force Measurement on a Large-Scale Model in a Short Duration Test Facility[J]. Review of Scientific Instruments, 2005, 76 (3).
[6] Tanno H, Komuro T, Takahashi M, et al. Unsteady Force Measurement Technique in Shock Tubes[J]. Review of Scientific Instruments, 2004, 75(2): 532-536.
[7] Tanno H, Komuro T, Sato K, et al. Free-Flight Measurement Technique in the Free-Piston High-Enthalpy Shock Tunnel[J]. Review of Scientific Instruments, 2014, 85(4).
[8] Singh P, Menezes V, Irimpan K J, et al. Impulse Force Balance for Ultrashort Duration Hypersonic Test Facilities[J]. Shock and Vibration, 2015, (8).
[9] Singh P, Trivedi S, Menezes V, et al. Dynamic Calibration and Validation of an Accelerometer Force Balance for Hypersonic Lifting Models[J]. The Scientific World Journal, 2014, (6).
[10] Naumann K W, Ende H, Mathieu G, et al. Millisecond Aerodynamic Force Measurement with Side-Jet Model in the ISL Shock Tunnel[J]. AIAA Journal, 1993, 31(6): 1068-1074.
[11] Laurence S J, Karl S. An Improved Visualization-Based Force-Measurement Technique for Short-Duration Hypersonic Facilities[J]. Experiments in Fluids, 2010, 48 (6): 949-965.
[12] Laurence S J, Hornung H G. Image-Based Force Measurement in Hypersonic Facilities [J]. Experiments in Fluids, 2009, 46(2): 343-353.
[13] Robinson M J, Mee D J, Tsai C Y, et al. Three-Component Force Measurements on a Large Scramjet in a Shock Tunnel[J]. Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets, 2004, 41(3): 416-425.
[14] Robinson M, Hannemann K. Short Duration Force Measurements in Impulse Facilities[C]. San Francisco: 25th AIAA Aerodynamic Measurement Technology and Ground Testing Conference, 2006.
[15] Marineau E C. Force Measurements in Hypervelocity Flows with an Acceleration Compensated Piezoelectric Balance[J]. Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets, 2011, 48(4): 697-700.
[16] 乐嘉陵. 吸气式高超声速技术研究进展[J]. 推进技术, 2010, 31(6): 641-649. (LE Jia-ling. Progress in Air-breathing Hypersonic Technology[J]. Journal of Propulsion Technology, 2010, 31(6): 641-649.)
[17] Wang Y, Liu Y, Luo C, et al. Force Measurement Using Strain-gauge Balance in a Shock Tunnel with Long Test Duration[J]. Review of Scientific Instruments, 2016, 87(5).
[18] 姜宗林, 李进平, 赵伟, 等. 长试验时间爆轰驱动激波风洞技术研究[J]. 力学学报, 2012, 44(5): 824-831.
[19] 刘洪山, 徐翔, 姜华. 应力波天平在国内激波风洞上的应用[J]. 实验流体力学, 2006, 20(1): 36-39.
[20] 王锋, 贺伟, 毛鹏飞, 等. 脉冲风洞测力系统建模与载荷辨识方法研究[J]. 振动与冲击, 2015, 34(1): 94-103.
[21] 王泽江, 唐小伟, 宋文萍, 等. 圆截面超燃冲压发动机冷态内流测力试验[J]. 推进技术, 2016, 37(4): 617-623. (WANG Ze-jiang, TANG Xiao-wei, SONG Wen-ping, et al. Zero-Fuel Internal Flow Force Test for Circular Cross Section Scramjet Engine[J]. Journal of Propulsion Technology, 2016, 37(4): 617-623.)
[22] Gounaris G D, Anifantis N K. Structural Damping Determination by Finite Element Approach[J]. Computers and Structures, 1999, 73(1): 445-452.
[23] Spears R E, Jensen S R. Approach for Selection of Rayleigh Damping Parameters Used for Time History Analysis[J]. Journal of Pressure Vessel Technology, 2009, 134(6): 67-75.
[24] Pan D, Chen G, Wang Z. Suboptimal Rayleigh Damping Coefficients in Seismic Analysis of Viscously Damped Structures[J]. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, 2014, 13(4): 653-670.　　　　　　　　　　　　　*　收稿日期:2017-05-20；修订日期:2017-06-28。基金项目:高超声速冲压发动机技术重点实验室基金(STS/MY-ZY-2015-007)。通讯作者:吕金洲,男,博士生,研究领域为高超声速测力系统动力学。E-mail: shenqiuwo@126.com(编辑:朱立影)