Gas Path Fault Diagnosis Based on Second-Order Robust Sliding Mode Observer for Civil Turbofan Engine

doi:10.13675/j.cnki.tjjs.190210

Journal of Propulsion Technology ›› 2020, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (6): 1411-1419.DOI: 10.13675/j.cnki.tjjs.190210

• Test, Experiment and Control • Previous Articles Next Articles

Gas Path Fault Diagnosis Based on Second-Order Robust Sliding Mode Observer for Civil Turbofan Engine

Jiangsu Province Key Laboratory of Aerospace Power System,College of Energy and Power Engineering,Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics,Nanjing 210016,China

Published:2021-08-15

基于二阶鲁棒滑模观测器的民用涡扇发动机气路故障诊断

强子健¹，鲁峰¹，常晓东¹，黄金泉¹

南京航空航天大学能源与动力学院江苏省航空动力系统重点实验室，江苏南京 210016

作者简介:强子健，硕士生，研究领域为航空发动机故障诊断。E-mail：qiangzijian@gmail.com

Abstract

Abstract: In view of the state estimator problems in aero-engine gas path parameter estimation such as slow response and weak robustness, a sliding mode observer design method based on the structure of super-twisting was proposed for aero-engine gas path fault diagnosis by reconstructing unknown inputs. By considering health parameters as unknown inputs, the switching term was designed to reconstruct the variation of health parameters. Since the assumption that the derivative of health parameters is zero in the state estimator design is avoided, the method proposed in this paper has a faster response speed when dealing with abrupt faults. A new form of an augmented fault vector is proposed for robustnes. By augmenting the disturbance term to the health parameter vector, the observer can estimate the variation of health parameters and also the magnitude of the disturbance by reconstructed signal at the same time and realize the decoupling of disturbance and component fault, thus avoiding the influence of uncertainty on the estimation results of health parameters. In this paper, a linear parameter varying model is established within the envelope range of a civil turbofan engine and the effectiveness of the method is verified by numerical simulation under different fault modes and comparison with the state estimator. The results show that the designed sliding mode observer has an estimation error of less than 0.5%, which effectively improves the estimation rate of gas path health parameters and enhances the robustness against uncertainties.

Key words: Fault diagnosis;Sliding mode observer;Health parameter;Uncertainty;Turbofan engine

摘要： 针对状态估计器在航空发动机气路参数估计中响应迟缓、鲁棒性不强等问题，以未知输入重构的思路，提出了一种基于Super-twisting滑模观测器的航空发动机气路故障诊断方法。通过将健康参数考虑为未知输入，设计滑模切换项重构健康参数的变化量，由于避免了状态估计器设计中健康参数导数为零的假设，本文的方法在处理突变故障时拥有更快的响应速度。针对鲁棒性问题，提出了一种新的故障向量增广形式，通过将扰动项增广至健康参数向量中，观测器的重构信号能够同时估计出健康参数变化量以及扰动项的大小，实现扰动与部件故障的解耦，从而避免了不确定项对健康参数估计结果的影响。本文建立了民用涡扇发动机包线范围内的线性变参数模型，通过不同故障模式下的数值仿真，并与状态估计器比较，验证了方法的有效性。结果表明，设计的滑模观测器具有小于0.5%的估计误差，有效地提高了气路健康参数的估计速度，增强了对不确定性的鲁棒性。

关键词: 故障诊断;滑模观测器;健康参数;不确定性;涡扇发动机

QIANG Zi-jian¹, LU Feng¹, CHANG Xiao-dong¹, HUANG Jin-quan¹. Gas Path Fault Diagnosis Based on Second-Order Robust Sliding Mode Observer for Civil Turbofan Engine[J]. Journal of Propulsion Technology, 2020, 41(6): 1411-1419.

强子健，鲁峰，常晓东，黄金泉. 基于二阶鲁棒滑模观测器的民用涡扇发动机气路故障诊断[J]. 推进技术, 2020, 41(6): 1411-1419.

References

[1] 孙健国. 现代航空动力装置控制[M]. 北京：航空工业出版社, 2009.
[2] 范作民，孙春林，白杰. 航空发动机故障诊断导论[M]. 北京：科学出版社， 2004.
[3] 黄伟斌，黄金泉. 航空发动机故障诊断的机载自适应模型[J]. 航空动力学报， 2008， 23(3):580-584.
[4] Jaw L C. Recent Advancements in Aircraft Engine Health Management (EHM) Technologies and Recommendations for the Next Step[C]. Reno-Tahoe: ASME Turbo Expo 2005: Power for Land， Sea， and Air， 2005.
[5] 姜彩虹，孙志岩，王曦. 航空发动机预测健康管理系统设计的关键技术[J]. 航空动力学报， 2009， 24(11): 2589-2594.
[6] 王亚凡. 航空发动机气路故障融合诊断方法研究[D]. 南京：南京航空航天大学， 2016.
[7] Simon D L， Garg S. Optimal Tuner Selection for Kalman Filter-Based Aircraft Engine Performance Estimation[C]. Orlando: ASME Turbo Expo 2009: Power for Land， Sea， and Air， 2009.
[8] 徐清诗，郭迎清. 基于自适应滑模观测器的航空发动机故障诊断[J]. 航空计算技术， 2016， 46(4): 83-86.
[9] 俞刚，黄金泉. 基于支持向量机和卡尔曼滤波器的航空发动机故障诊断研究[J]. 航空发动机， 2012， 38(1): 47-50.
[10] 徐启华，师军，耿帅. 应用快速多分类SVM的航空发动机故障诊断方法[J]. 推进技术， 2012， 33(6):961-967.
[11] Feng L， Jinquan H， Xiaojie Q. Application of Multi-Outputs LSSVR by PSO to the Aero-Engine Model[J]. Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics， 2009， 20(5): 1153-1158.
[12] 王修岩，李萃芳，高铭阳，等. 基于SVM和SNN的航空发动机气路故障诊断[J]. 航空动力学报， 2014， 29(10): 2493-2498.
[13] 孙斌，张津. 发动机气路参数故障诊断法在EMS中的应用[J]. 航空发动机， 1997, (4): 15-19.
[14] 杨征山，俞刚，庄锡明，等. 基于参数线性组合的航空发动机气路健康参数估计[J]. 推进技术， 2014， 35(3): 408-412.
[15] Zhang J， Swain A K， Nguang S K . Robust Sliding Mode Observer Based Fault Estimation for Certain Class of Uncertain Nonlinear Systems[J]. Asian Journal of Control， 2015， 17(4): 1296-1309.
[16] Zhao L， Xu J. Robust Sliding Mode Observer Design for Nonlinear Uncertain Systems[C]. Changchun: International Conference on Computer， Mechatronics， Control and Electronic Engineering， 2010.
[17] Chu X， Nian X， Liu J， et al. Robust Fault Detection for Multi-Motor Winding System Based on Disturbance Observer and Sliding-Mode Observer[C]. Queensland: 2017 11th Asian Control Conference (ASCC)， 2017.
[18] Bouibed K， Seddiki L， Guelton K， et al. Actuator Fault Detection by Nonlinear Sliding Mode Observers: Application to an Actuated Seat[C]. Nice: Control & Fault-Tolerant Systems， 2013.
[19] Yan X G， Edwards C. Robust Sliding Mode Observer-Based Actuator Fault Detection and Isolation for a Class of Nonlinear Systems[J]. International Journal of Systems Science， 2008， 39(4):349-359.
[20] Tan C P， Edwards C. Sliding Mode Observers for Detection and Reconstruction of Sensor Faults[J]. Automatica， 2002， 38(10): 1815-1821.
[21] Chang X， Huang J， Lu F. Health Parameter Estimation with Second-Order Sliding Mode Observer for a Turbofan Engine[J]. Energies， 2017， 10(7).
[22] Alwi H， Edwards C， Tan C P. Fault Detection and Fault-Tolerant Control Using Sliding Modes[M]. London: Springer， 2011.
[23] Ben Brahim A， Dhahri S， Ben Hmida F， et al. Simultaneous Actuator and Sensor Faults Reconstruction Based on Robust Sliding Mode Observer for a Class of Nonlinear Systems[J]. Asian Journal of Control， 2017， 19(1):362-371.
[24] 周文祥. 航空发动机及控制系统建模与面向对象的仿真研究[D]. 南京：南京航空航天大学， 2006.
[25] Lu F， Huang J， Lv Y. Gas Path Health Monitoring for a Turbofan Engine Based on a Nonlinear Filtering Approach[J]. Energies， 2013， 6(1): 492-513.
[26] 姜锐. 航空发动机线性变参数控制方法研究[D]. 南京：南京航空航天大学， 2015.
[27] 冯敏. 涡扇发动机气路健康参数滤波估计方法研究[D]. 南京：南京航空航天大学， 2013.
[28] Davila J， Fridman L， Levant A. Second-order Sliding-mode Observer for Mechanical Systems[J]. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control， 2005， 50(11): 1785-1789.
[29] Moreno J A， Osorio M. Strict Lyapunov Functions for the Super-Twisting Algorithm[J]. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control， 2012， 57(4): 1035-1040.
[30] Kobayashi T， Simon D L. Hybrid Kalman Filter: A New Approach for Aircraft Engine In-Flight Diagnostics[R]. NASA/TM2006-214491.

Gas Path Fault Diagnosis Based on Second-Order Robust Sliding Mode Observer for Civil Turbofan Engine

基于二阶鲁棒滑模观测器的民用涡扇发动机气路故障诊断

PDF

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

References

Related Articles 0

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments